![]() |
Originally Posted by MtEverest
(Post 1906003)
Has anybody heard from Council 1 or 20? Will they provide a proper pro/con paper in the tradition of ALPA that was once trusted with facts?
Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1906045)
I think it was slowplay that thought it. Funny though.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1906051)
Haven't spoken to either councils about this, but I can tell you that there was serious discussion during C2012 at the MEC administration level of putting Council 20 (DTW) under receivership via Article 8 of the ALPA constitution. That would have meant the elected leadership removed and ALPA national running the council. That's how angry that MEC administration was at council 20 for producing con papers and dissenting views. That could very well be happening again. If so, I hope those councils speak up anyway.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 1905908)
And we'll be back to the table in 2018, 2 years before AA's CURRENT deal expires
|
Originally Posted by Instructordude
(Post 1906008)
I am a yes but what happens when the company cant afford these 20% raises? Now what?
Originally Posted by Instructordude
(Post 1906008)
Profit sharing wont matter cause will headed towards BK.
Originally Posted by Instructordude
(Post 1906008)
I actually like the sick call procedures, keeps people honest,
Originally Posted by Instructordude
(Post 1906008)
and dont mind the LCA. Why should anybody be payed to sit at home. Pretty sure nobody gets paid to sit on their a$$ at HQ's.
Originally Posted by Instructordude
(Post 1906008)
I am proudly voting yes but with reservations.
Carl |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1906020)
Convenient that you omitted the first part of my post.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Instructordude
(Post 1906008)
. I actually like the sick call procedures, keeps people honest, and dont mind the LCA. Why should anybody be payed to sit at home. Pretty sure nobody gets paid to sit on their a$$ at HQ's. I am proudly voting yes but with reservations.
|
Originally Posted by ERflyer
(Post 1906009)
Like I said, I am currently undecided on this one however. First, the money. |
Originally Posted by SayAlt
(Post 1906043)
Carl should be recruited to replace Donutbelly. Unfortunately, Carl is too smart and honest to ever take the job. :(
Carl |
Originally Posted by Instructordude
(Post 1906008)
I am a yes but what happens when the company cant afford these 20% raises? Now what? Profit sharing wont matter cause will headed towards BK. I actually like the sick call procedures, keeps people honest, and dont mind the LCA. Why should anybody be payed to sit at home. Pretty sure nobody gets paid to sit on their a$$ at HQ's. I am proudly voting yes but with reservations.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands