Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Poll: Who wanted a TA more? >

Poll: Who wanted a TA more?

Search

Notices
View Poll Results: Who is the most desperate to get a TA?
DAL
58
47.93%
DALPA/C44
55
45.45%
Pilots
8
6.61%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll

Poll: Who wanted a TA more?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2015 | 09:47 AM
  #201  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mesaba13
If the TA language was so similar to the old contract then why did the company insist on changing it?
Because they believe a significant number of pilots "banked" their 100 unverified hours of sick leave and then used that bank at the end of the sick leave year as free time off. They believe the changes would have decreased this behavior.
Reply
Old 09-14-2015 | 09:50 AM
  #202  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,248
Likes: 707
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog
Because they believe a significant number of pilots "banked" their 100 unverified hours of sick leave and then used that bank at the end of the sick leave year as free time off. They believe the changes would have decreased this behavior.
Is this what is defined as abuse? 100 hours unverified is within the contract. In the bases where we have 4 seasonal changes a year people tend to get sick more often. May is one of the worst months. You can go skiing and swimming during that month, I've done it. Not to mention MIA layovers followed by BZN. Change it to expire on your anniversary date then, not rewrite the entire section to be more punitive. This is an invented productivity issue.
Reply
Old 09-14-2015 | 09:51 AM
  #203  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
You mad.

And you missed the important part, not getting paid while this all gets sorted out.

Just flew with a guy who is in month there if trying to get a simple dental claim issue settled for one of his kids. He has to go through the union who referred to the benefits people at Delta as those idiots.

But you would like to trust them to verify your medical records. Or is this not an issue because you don't fly the line? Maybe I get you now.
Apparently you "get" very little. You just "assume" very much. And it's a stretch to equate a denied dental claim to a sick leave verification. They, and the processes associated with them, are not remotely close. Right now, you are "trusting" some IT clerk in Flight Ops with the verification of your medical records. But if you need an excuse . . .
Reply
Old 09-14-2015 | 09:56 AM
  #204  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Is this what is defined as abuse? 100 hours unverified is within the contract. Change it to expire on your anniversary date then, not rewrite the entire section to be more punitive. This is an invented productivity issue.
Changing the effective date does not address the behavior. It only masks it. For some reason, management expects us to not call in sick when we aren't.
Reply
Old 09-14-2015 | 09:59 AM
  #205  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 100
From: Road construction signholder
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
Do you believe the sick leave changes in the failed TA would have caused pilots to work while sick, because they didn't want to approach the verification threshold?
These hypothetical changes might have, but shouldn't have. How many times have you read how we have no sick leave abuse anywhere ever, how dare the company suggest it, and therefore we need not change anything? If a hypothetical pilot flew sick just to avoid a certain sick usage threshold, then that would be on him not the company, DALPA, or the (hypothetical) contract.

If we truly were all saints, then no one would call in sick, unless they truly were, no matter how good or bad the contract.

I also realize that there is a real world out there and sometimes mgmt forgets that.
Reply
Old 09-14-2015 | 10:07 AM
  #206  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
These hypothetical changes might have, but shouldn't have. How many times have you read how we have no sick leave abuse anywhere ever, how dare the company suggest it, and therefore we need not change anything? If a hypothetical pilot flew sick just to avoid a certain sick usage threshold, then that would be on him not the company, DALPA, or the (hypothetical) contract.

If we truly were all saints, then no one would call in sick, unless they truly were, no matter how good or bad the contract.

I also realize that there is a real world out there and sometimes mgmt forgets that.
I respectfully want to point out that you didn't answer the question.


Do you believe that the changes the TA would have made to our sick leave policy would have caused some pilots to gone to work when, otherwise they wouldn't have?
Reply
Old 09-14-2015 | 10:13 AM
  #207  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog
Wrong! You did not even understand the terms of the agreement you voted against!!

The TA changed the term "doctor" to "Qualified Health Care Professional" and added A.P.R.N. and P.A. - C to the list. A.P.R.N. is an Advance Practice Registered Nurse (commonly referred to as a Nurse Practitioner) and P.A. - C is a "Physician's Assistant - Certified."
I'm not arguing about using a PA. Now pay attention.

Did you happen to "verify" the definition of QHCP? Of course not. In NA15, it was defined as:
Qualified health care professional (QHCP)” means a medical professional appropriately licensed or credentialed with whom a pilot has a bona fide patient relationship and who holds one of the following degrees:
The company (or was it you?) wanted that language specifically so they (or Sedgwick) could deny your sick verification if you went to a local doc-in-the-box.

But I forgot. You and your clown posse are "we don't think they'd do that" kind of guy.

You were saying something...was it "you did not even understand the terms of the agreement you voted against!!" Oops.

Any luck finding that Frozen princess costume to rent? Be sure to get it dry cleaned before you wear it.
Reply
Old 09-14-2015 | 10:14 AM
  #208  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,248
Likes: 707
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog
Changing the effective date does not address the behavior. It only masks it. For some reason, management expects us to not call in sick when we aren't.
I thought May was the problem. I think that is what we are doing, calling in sick when sick, well when well. You are too quick to post a reply, or I put too much thought into it. I edited my above post for context.

Last edited by notEnuf; 09-14-2015 at 10:25 AM.
Reply
Old 09-14-2015 | 10:18 AM
  #209  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Did you happen to "verify" the definition of QHCP? Of course not. In NA15, it was defined as:


The company wanted that specifically so they (or Sedgwick) could deny your sick verification if you went to a local doc-in-the-box.

But I forgot. You and your clown posse are "we don't think they'd do that" kind of guy.

You were saying something about "not understanding" the dead TA you voted for...?

Good luck with everything.
Yeah I read it. The second you walk into a Minute Clinic or other similar operation and see that QHCP for an illness, you have a bona fide patient relationship. So it's exactly as I posted. Stop being so scared.
Reply
Old 09-14-2015 | 10:24 AM
  #210  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
I thought May was the problem. I think that is what we are doing, calling in sick when sick, well when well. You are too quick I edited my above post for context.
I read your edited post. Thanks for pointing it out. As was pointed out in the road shows by one of the negotiators, a huge rainstorm must sweep over the country every May 31 and wipe away all the pollen and germs, because on June 1 of every year, the sick leave rate drops off a cliff. I don't believe the company has a problem with it being May. They just have a problem that it happens at all. As they pointed out at the roadshow, the same charts could be drawn using employment month rather than calendar month.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Military
10
01-26-2011 06:31 PM
taymor1234
Hiring News
0
12-18-2010 06:30 PM
Joachim
Hangar Talk
12
01-02-2010 11:41 AM
CoastalFlyer
Hiring News
5
04-02-2009 02:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices