Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
I feel like you are crossing the streams....
If the flow down doesn't exist, then 35 x 76 seaters go away.
If the flow down did exist, no more than 90% of the compass seniority list could be replaced with mainline pilots.
If the flow down doesn't exist, then 35 x 76 seaters go away.
If the flow down did exist, no more than 90% of the compass seniority list could be replaced with mainline pilots.
The section of the contract that the Compass LOA mentioned for the reducitons states "aircraft configured with 71-76 passenger seats".
So those planes would now be maxed at 70 seats, but I believe DCI was already at the PWA limit of 102 planes in the 51-70 seat range.
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
If you flushed 90% of the pilot group at Endeavor, Delta has to continue paying, or buy out those flushed pilots due to the bridge agreement. I don't know what the solution to that is, probably Delta permanently parking those aircraft. That's 350+ additional pilots on the street.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
The parking 35 76-seaters because of the flow back issue is one thing, but what about if/when mainline only brings back 80% of its fleet? Aren’t there scope implications there too? Smaller mainline fleet=smaller RJ fleet mandated by scope?
I am not that well versed in DL scope, but I thought that’s how it worked.
I am not that well versed in DL scope, but I thought that’s how it worked.
The parking 35 76-seaters because of the flow back issue is one thing, but what about if/when mainline only brings back 80% of its fleet? Aren’t there scope implications there too? Smaller mainline fleet=smaller RJ fleet mandated by scope?
I am not that well versed in DL scope, but I thought that’s how it worked.
I am not that well versed in DL scope, but I thought that’s how it worked.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




