Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
04-10-2020, 06:50 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,251
Originally Posted by Mesabah
It’s not 90%, it’s 350 pilots for 35 aircraft that we can’t operate anyway.
Delta pilots."
04-10-2020, 06:53 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,251
Originally Posted by Mesabah
That’s not what is required in their contract, it’s only 35 aircraft.
If the flow down doesn't exist, then 35 x 76 seaters go away.
If the flow down did exist, no more than 90% of the compass seniority list could be replaced with mainline pilots.
04-10-2020, 07:00 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,251
Originally Posted by 4myfamily
That could be any combination between the 3 DCI companies or think like Delta Management and just remove 1 or more seats from 35 aircraft....problem solved.
i think regional pilots invented FAKE NEWS!
i think regional pilots invented FAKE NEWS!
The section of the contract that the Compass LOA mentioned for the reducitons states "aircraft configured with 71-76 passenger seats".
So those planes would now be maxed at 70 seats, but I believe DCI was already at the PWA limit of 102 planes in the 51-70 seat range.
04-10-2020, 07:32 PM
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
I feel like you are crossing the streams....
If the flow down doesn't exist, then 35 x 76 seaters go away.
If the flow down did exist, no more than 90% of the compass seniority list could be replaced with mainline pilots.
If the flow down doesn't exist, then 35 x 76 seaters go away.
If the flow down did exist, no more than 90% of the compass seniority list could be replaced with mainline pilots.
04-10-2020, 08:31 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 147
The parking 35 76-seaters because of the flow back issue is one thing, but what about if/when mainline only brings back 80% of its fleet? Aren’t there scope implications there too? Smaller mainline fleet=smaller RJ fleet mandated by scope?
I am not that well versed in DL scope, but I thought that’s how it worked.
I am not that well versed in DL scope, but I thought that’s how it worked.
04-10-2020, 08:41 PM
On Guard!
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,181
Originally Posted by pad39a
The parking 35 76-seaters because of the flow back issue is one thing, but what about if/when mainline only brings back 80% of its fleet? Aren’t there scope implications there too? Smaller mainline fleet=smaller RJ fleet mandated by scope?
I am not that well versed in DL scope, but I thought that’s how it worked.
I am not that well versed in DL scope, but I thought that’s how it worked.
04-11-2020, 03:49 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,251
Originally Posted by Meow1215
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I believe the authorized RJ count is an aggregate of DALPAs total negotiation package. Not a moving ratio of A/C at maineline to DCI.
The max number of 76 seaters was 153, but if ML added a new small NB fleet (717), the number could be raised above 153 at a ratio of 1x 76 seater for every 1.25 NB, up to a max of 223 x 76 seaters.
But as the number of 76 seaters went up, the number of 50 seaters had to go down. 1 Jan of every year the ratio is looked at if the number of 76 seaters remains above 153.
If the max number of 76 seaters is maintained (223), the max number of 50 seaters is capped at 125.
04-11-2020, 04:41 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,237
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
Kind of....
The max number of 76 seaters was 153, but if ML added a new small NB fleet (717), the number could be raised above 153 at a ratio of 1x 76 seater for every 1.25 NB, up to a max of 223 x 76 seaters.
But as the number of 76 seaters went up, the number of 50 seaters had to go down. 1 Jan of every year the ratio is looked at if the number of 76 seaters remains above 153.
If the max number of 76 seaters is maintained (223), the max number of 50 seaters is capped at 125.
The max number of 76 seaters was 153, but if ML added a new small NB fleet (717), the number could be raised above 153 at a ratio of 1x 76 seater for every 1.25 NB, up to a max of 223 x 76 seaters.
But as the number of 76 seaters went up, the number of 50 seaters had to go down. 1 Jan of every year the ratio is looked at if the number of 76 seaters remains above 153.
If the max number of 76 seaters is maintained (223), the max number of 50 seaters is capped at 125.
04-11-2020, 06:29 AM
On Guard!
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,181
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
Kind of....
The max number of 76 seaters was 153, but if ML added a new small NB fleet (717), the number could be raised above 153 at a ratio of 1x 76 seater for every 1.25 NB, up to a max of 223 x 76 seaters.
But as the number of 76 seaters went up, the number of 50 seaters had to go down. 1 Jan of every year the ratio is looked at if the number of 76 seaters remains above 153.
If the max number of 76 seaters is maintained (223), the max number of 50 seaters is capped at 125.
The max number of 76 seaters was 153, but if ML added a new small NB fleet (717), the number could be raised above 153 at a ratio of 1x 76 seater for every 1.25 NB, up to a max of 223 x 76 seaters.
But as the number of 76 seaters went up, the number of 50 seaters had to go down. 1 Jan of every year the ratio is looked at if the number of 76 seaters remains above 153.
If the max number of 76 seaters is maintained (223), the max number of 50 seaters is capped at 125.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
