Search
Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Sam Pool Email

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2018, 09:29 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SilentLurker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Position: FO
Posts: 793
Default

Originally Posted by mketch11 View Post
This is BS. Any FO with 800hrs 121 at envoy can be off of reserve if they want unless they are prior 121. This means that all FOs who are choosing to be on reserve who aren’t prior 121, are probably doing it to avoid flying. Saying the “overwhelming consensus” is saying that all those FOs choosing to be on reserve really want to get flight time as quick as possible. Really?


Few online forum bantering (few compared to overall large FOs on property).
SilentLurker is offline  
Old 05-08-2018, 09:30 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MD-11Loader's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Pawn
Posts: 1,138
Default

Originally Posted by Pedro4President View Post
Wait were you wanting to burn it down when as a NH you got a 20k bonus plus base salary increases when The protected pilots got hardly anything. Your increase in compensation was 20x more than the protected pilots.

I have been saying this continually that at Envoy we have winners and losers. It sucks that this time you drew the short straw.
I want to be a captain, but on my terms. There are positives in this agreement, but they still don’t outweigh the fact that I am being forced to upgrade and go back to reserve before I want to. While I respect the sacrifices of those of you who stuck it out through the bad times, I am concerned with my QOL, and a mandatory upgrade drastically reduces that QOL.
MD-11Loader is offline  
Old 05-08-2018, 09:32 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
Default

I m a 600 hourish FO that likes the new rules regarding fo flying. I dont bid reserve but i do value paid time with my family more than speeding to 1000 hours.

The one question i dont see answered, if i m displaced under this provision, can i pick up ot at premium on those days?

Regarding the flow settlement... Feel like we could have gotten more but i m not losing sleep over it. Still not expecting to wait arround for flow.
highfarfast is offline  
Old 05-08-2018, 09:35 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: Resigned
Posts: 1,547
Default

Aw yes, displace me per LOA daddy.
NoValueAviator is offline  
Old 05-08-2018, 09:36 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 217
Default

Originally Posted by highfarfast View Post

The one question i dont see answered, if i m displaced under this provision, can i pick up ot at premium on those days?
Why would you expect to be displaced if you have less than 1000hrs? Wouldn’t that defeat the purpose?
mketch11 is offline  
Old 05-08-2018, 09:37 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by mketch11 View Post
As a 600 hr FO, I feel like I’m giving up the most only to gain the least. The protected pilots get more flow by giving up nothing. None of the concessions will affect a protected pilot. Good for them I guess but not at the expense of everyone who is junior.

You received your sign on bonus at the expense of everyone senior to you....most of the remainder of the protected pilots have been screwed over by the company for the past 2 years while all the new hires have cashed in with big bonuses, short reserve time and quick upgrades. Be thankful you didn't have to start out at $27 an hour, 3 years reserve, 8 year upgrade, and multiple base closures and displacements.

Now you get to upgrade and make CA pay day 1, and flow faster to AA.
wiz5422 is offline  
Old 05-08-2018, 09:37 AM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 86
Default

I’m kind of surprised by the pilots beyond the protected pilots that seem to think they’re not benefiting from the increase in flow to the protected pilots. In fact, those who benefit most from this increase are the last class of protected pilots and everybody junior to them as the increase in flow through compounds with time. I think everybody after the protected pilots just moved forward 3-4 months, not sure exactly.
copycopy is offline  
Old 05-08-2018, 09:37 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 217
Default

Once again the folks who aren’t affected will reap the benefits
mketch11 is offline  
Old 05-08-2018, 09:37 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 468
Default

Originally Posted by MD-11Loader View Post
I want to be a captain, but on my terms. There are positives in this agreement, but they still don’t outweigh the fact that I am being forced to upgrade and go back to reserve before I want to. While I respect the sacrifices of those of you who stuck it out through the bad times, I am concerned with my QOL, and a mandatory upgrade drastically reduces that QOL.
Lot’s of “I” in that statement.

You guys now get ca Pay day 1 not 3-4 months later. Flow 4ish months sooner. More hotels & A12 passes if new to LGA based. 25 extra hours IOE. And you’re complaing because you can’t personslly sit rsv longer due to not wanting to upgrade right away?

The rest of us sat years on reserve, saw minimum 4 base closures and flow disruptions continually. Let’s not even talk about pay as Pedro stated
SkylineAviation is offline  
Old 05-08-2018, 09:39 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Default

Originally Posted by mketch11 View Post
This is BS. Any FO with 800hrs 121 at envoy can be off of reserve if they want unless they are prior 121. This means that all FOs who are choosing to be on reserve who aren’t prior 121, are probably doing it to avoid flying. Saying the “overwhelming consensus” is saying that all those FOs choosing to be on reserve really want to get flight time as quick as possible. Really?
This is really not going to help the company get more TOTAL captain eligible FOs sooner. It will force a few hold outs sooner. But if they are going to DISPLACE other FOs from flying, then it will delay those FOs by the same number of hours.

This is also taking away OT from those who want it and are trying to build time.

If the “overwhelming consensus” of FOs on the cusp was wanting to get more flight time, you wouldn’t have people on the cusp bidding reserve. You also wouldn’t have to displace those who just became eligible. Do they really think so or expect anyone to believe this?
pitchattitude is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Opposing View
Cargo
62
03-07-2011 04:55 PM
Hoss
Regional
19
03-26-2009 09:29 AM
phxsuns1319
Regional
9
04-29-2008 12:28 PM
SKMarz
Cargo
22
09-27-2007 08:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices