Sam Pool Email
05-08-2018 | 11:44 AM
#51
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
There was no grievance in for the rest. When the time comes cross that bridge then unless the company negotiates in good faith in advance of non pp flowing of their own fruition.
05-08-2018 | 11:45 AM
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
05-08-2018 | 11:48 AM
#53
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
It's the same language that was there when you signed the employment paperwork. I'm not really understanding why everyone is acting like this part changed for the worse. Would getting increased flow for every group have been great? Of course. But I don't get why guys are acting like the post PP language has somehow changed.
05-08-2018 | 11:49 AM
#54
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Sure we can griev again, but really, we are just pushing the problem down the road. I am very happy however for the PP’s and wish it could have come sooner for them. Congratulations.
The rest of the changes have pros and cons all around so I am pretty neutral to them.
05-08-2018 | 11:53 AM
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 158
It's the same language that was there when you signed the employment paperwork. I'm not really understanding why everyone is acting like this part changed for the worse. Would getting increased flow for every group have been great? Of course. But I don't get why guys are acting like the post PP language has somehow changed.
05-08-2018 | 11:54 AM
#56
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Any idea why someone going to 145 LGA CA training in 10 days would be withheld from training due to staffing, and returned to their status of 175 FO DFW?
Here I was thinking we needed CAs, especially in LGA. And I bid for it specifically lol. I don’t get it.
Here I was thinking we needed CAs, especially in LGA. And I bid for it specifically lol. I don’t get it.
05-08-2018 | 11:55 AM
#57
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 158
I guess I am coming from a different angle. While I understand it hasn’t changed, that’s kind of the point I am making. I just felt we were in a great spot negotiating wise and it would have been nice to firm everything up and improve the flow for everyone. That’s all I am trying to say. I personally know people that were on the fence about coming here because the flow was kind of wishy washy and this doesn’t do anything for that.
Sure we can griev again, but really, we are just pushing the problem down the road. I am very happy however for the PP’s and wish it could have come sooner for them. Congratulations.
The rest of the changes have pros and cons all around so I am pretty neutral to them.
Sure we can griev again, but really, we are just pushing the problem down the road. I am very happy however for the PP’s and wish it could have come sooner for them. Congratulations.
The rest of the changes have pros and cons all around so I am pretty neutral to them.
05-08-2018 | 11:56 AM
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 158
Maybe they don’t want to pay you the captain rate yet lol.
05-08-2018 | 12:08 PM
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
I'm ok settling the grievance before the arbitration but we gave up some stuff to get the settlement.
05-08-2018 | 12:08 PM
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: EMB145 CA
I think this was mostly a good settlement. Too bad there are no reparations to those who were affected and have flowed or are flowing short term. I think THAT is one area that could have been better negotiated. I want my 3 months of wide body Captain pay back!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
