Envoy vs. PSA | Pay Rate Comparison
06-06-2019 | 03:33 PM
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
I have an issue with ‘xyz is not historically bad so what we have is OK”. We’re entering an historical anomaly regarding the number of retirements. Why are we supposed to just ignore that?
AND, the post that I’m referencing thinks flow is 7-8... until guys here are working actively to get out without regards to flow (remains to be seen) flow will be 8+.
AND, the post that I’m referencing thinks flow is 7-8... until guys here are working actively to get out without regards to flow (remains to be seen) flow will be 8+.
06-06-2019 | 05:31 PM
#63
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
I have an issue with ‘xyz is not historically bad so what we have is OK”. We’re entering an historical anomaly regarding the number of retirements. Why are we supposed to just ignore that?
AND, the post that I’m referencing thinks flow is 7-8... until guys here are working actively to get out without regards to flow (remains to be seen) flow will be 8+.
AND, the post that I’m referencing thinks flow is 7-8... until guys here are working actively to get out without regards to flow (remains to be seen) flow will be 8+.
06-06-2019 | 06:40 PM
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
Yeah, ALPA website projection is more like 9 years.
There are a lot of pie in the sky guys (dera) that think “oh, it will be much less than 9 years because everyone will be hiring like crazy”. However, almost all of ENVOY’s non-flow attrition are guys that are VERY junior so that attrition only effects you while you are junior to THEM.
Without major changes, you will not flow in less than 8 years. I’m not even getting into the loose language regarding non-protected flow.
But HEY, come here! I really want someone junior to me to sit reserve so I don’t have to.
There are a lot of pie in the sky guys (dera) that think “oh, it will be much less than 9 years because everyone will be hiring like crazy”. However, almost all of ENVOY’s non-flow attrition are guys that are VERY junior so that attrition only effects you while you are junior to THEM.
Without major changes, you will not flow in less than 8 years. I’m not even getting into the loose language regarding non-protected flow.
But HEY, come here! I really want someone junior to me to sit reserve so I don’t have to.
06-07-2019 | 02:57 AM
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 157
Yeah, ALPA website projection is more like 9 years.
There are a lot of pie in the sky guys (dera) that think “oh, it will be much less than 9 years because everyone will be hiring like crazy”. However, almost all of ENVOY’s non-flow attrition are guys that are VERY junior so that attrition only effects you while you are junior to THEM.
Without major changes, you will not flow in less than 8 years. I’m not even getting into the loose language regarding non-protected flow.
But HEY, come here! I really want someone junior to me to sit reserve so I don’t have to.
There are a lot of pie in the sky guys (dera) that think “oh, it will be much less than 9 years because everyone will be hiring like crazy”. However, almost all of ENVOY’s non-flow attrition are guys that are VERY junior so that attrition only effects you while you are junior to THEM.
Without major changes, you will not flow in less than 8 years. I’m not even getting into the loose language regarding non-protected flow.
But HEY, come here! I really want someone junior to me to sit reserve so I don’t have to.
This is great for a new hire for about a year, when suddenly you are senior to these people again. While we do lose some senior people, the fact of the matter is that the more senior you get, the less likely you will be affected by attrition because the more of your peers are holding out for the flow.
06-07-2019 | 04:45 PM
#68
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Yeah, ALPA website projection is more like 9 years.
There are a lot of pie in the sky guys (dera) that think “oh, it will be much less than 9 years because everyone will be hiring like crazy”. However, almost all of ENVOY’s non-flow attrition are guys that are VERY junior so that attrition only effects you while you are junior to THEM.
Without major changes, you will not flow in less than 8 years. I’m not even getting into the loose language regarding non-protected flow.
But HEY, come here! I really want someone junior to me to sit reserve so I don’t have to.
There are a lot of pie in the sky guys (dera) that think “oh, it will be much less than 9 years because everyone will be hiring like crazy”. However, almost all of ENVOY’s non-flow attrition are guys that are VERY junior so that attrition only effects you while you are junior to THEM.
Without major changes, you will not flow in less than 8 years. I’m not even getting into the loose language regarding non-protected flow.
But HEY, come here! I really want someone junior to me to sit reserve so I don’t have to.
ALPA projects worst case scenario for flow. Company projects best case scenario for flow. Take the average. That’s probably what you are looking at.
The ALPA projection is just as inaccurate as the company’s projection.
This mindset can be extrapolated to everyone the company and ALPA tells you. ALPAs purpose is to make you think company is out to get you and that you really need ALPA to protect you by paying our ridiculous annual dues.
What ever the company tells you and what ALPA tells you are the polar extremes. The truth always is somewhere in the middle.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
