Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Envoy Airlines
Envoy vs. PSA | Pay Rate Comparison >

Envoy vs. PSA | Pay Rate Comparison

Search
Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy vs. PSA | Pay Rate Comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2019, 04:41 AM
  #51  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 4
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
I loved this one;
An entitled new hire cadet(already ****ed off about his 145 seat) during indoc why PSA got the pay and Envoy didn't. An union guy said "it's because of you. If you weren't here, we would get them too".

Boom.
The company cares about many different metrics, not just filling classes with new pilots. Many of the things the company cares about could be impacted by the current pilot group on property with union leadership. Waiting for classes to not fill up is the easy answer because it requires the union and current pilots to do nothing. They can just point their fingers at new pilots happy to be at an airline instead of doing their job. Pay rates at envoy have been behind for several years now so instead of blaming the newest pilots in the company how about owning the fact that over the past two years many other regionals have gotten pay increases but we haven’t.
New pilots aren’t entitled, we just can’t figure out why this pilot group has been happy working for peanuts for so long.
FlyingJedi is offline  
Old 06-03-2019, 05:23 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
I loved this one;
An entitled new hire cadet(already ****ed off about his 145 seat) during indoc why PSA got the pay and Envoy didn't. An union guy said "it's because of you. If you weren't here, we would get them too".

Boom.
But how did a cadet end up with a 145? I thought the last 145 only class was before the PSA raise.
pitchattitude is offline  
Old 06-04-2019, 08:57 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: Resigned
Posts: 1,547
Default

Originally Posted by pitchattitude View Post
But how did a cadet end up with a 145? I thought the last 145 only class was before the PSA raise.
I mean, I agree that the post you quoted probably didn't actually happen but cadets have gotten the 145. Actually, as the proportion of cadets in classes increases, RTP hires dwindle, and street hires remain near zero, we'll see more and more cadets getting flushed down the 145 drain. Being a cadet only helps if you have non-cadets in class or your cadet seniority is better than the others.

It's a shame no one saw this coming early enough to kill the cadet program. Being able to count on access to unlimited enthusiastic applicants who would happily fly half our fleet for free and who will never ask for anything puts us in a terrible position for trying to achieve anything resembling parity with our peers.

At other places management might not ruthlessly take advantage of this situation, but here... well, every month a greater and greater proportion of our flying is done by reserves (who have essentially no protection in our crappy CBA), every month the schedules get worse and worse, and the hotels get crummier and crummier. No end in sight.
NoValueAviator is offline  
Old 06-04-2019, 10:17 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,663
Default

Originally Posted by NoValueAviator View Post
I mean, I agree that the post you quoted probably didn't actually happen but cadets have gotten the 145. Actually, as the proportion of cadets in classes increases, RTP hires dwindle, and street hires remain near zero, we'll see more and more cadets getting flushed down the 145 drain. Being a cadet only helps if you have non-cadets in class or your cadet seniority is better than the others.

It's a shame no one saw this coming early enough to kill the cadet program. Being able to count on access to unlimited enthusiastic applicants who would happily fly half our fleet for free and who will never ask for anything puts us in a terrible position for trying to achieve anything resembling parity with our peers.

At other places management might not ruthlessly take advantage of this situation, but here... well, every month a greater and greater proportion of our flying is done by reserves (who have essentially no protection in our crappy CBA), every month the schedules get worse and worse, and the hotels get crummier and crummier. No end in sight.
Falalalalala lalalala la
Cyio is offline  
Old 06-04-2019, 03:04 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: DHC-8 CA
Posts: 462
Default

Dang, I thought we were disgruntled over at Piedmont. But y’all have cause.
Best of luck at the table.
Theaveragejoker is offline  
Old 06-06-2019, 06:19 AM
  #56  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 97
Default

Originally Posted by NoValueAviator View Post
I mean, I agree that the post you quoted probably didn't actually happen but cadets have gotten the 145. Actually, as the proportion of cadets in classes increases, RTP hires dwindle, and street hires remain near zero, we'll see more and more cadets getting flushed down the 145 drain. Being a cadet only helps if you have non-cadets in class or your cadet seniority is better than the others.

It's a shame no one saw this coming early enough to kill the cadet program. Being able to count on access to unlimited enthusiastic applicants who would happily fly half our fleet for free and who will never ask for anything puts us in a terrible position for trying to achieve anything resembling parity with our peers.

At other places management might not ruthlessly take advantage of this situation, but here... well, every month a greater and greater proportion of our flying is done by reserves (who have essentially no protection in our crappy CBA), every month the schedules get worse and worse, and the hotels get crummier and crummier. No end in sight.
The FO I flew with Last night was a 2017 hire that was in the cadet program.

He was told by the recruiters that all the cadets would get the 175 no problem. Not one single person in class he said got the 175 and all got the 145.

He’s currently on forever reserve in DFW after displacing from ORD and guess when his flow is?

Sometime late 2026 with hopes for January 2026 due to flows and attrition.

A shame what’s going on here.
MochaSwirl is offline  
Old 06-06-2019, 06:25 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
chrisreedrules's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 4,599
Default

Originally Posted by MochaSwirl View Post
The FO I flew with Last night was a 2017 hire that was in the cadet program.

He was told by the recruiters that all the cadets would get the 175 no problem. Not one single person in class he said got the 175 and all got the 145.

He’s currently on forever reserve in DFW after displacing from ORD and guess when his flow is?

Sometime late 2026 with hopes for January 2026 due to flows and attrition.

A shame what’s going on here.
7-8 years to flow isn’t bad historically. Those flowing in 5-6 years (which is not the, “norm”) from the WOs simply timed things well. Nothing more, nothing less. It takes the average pilot 5-6 years to become competitive to be hired at a legacy anyway. Anyone coming from a 1,000-1,500 hour background to the regionals right now should expect it to take 5-8 years to move on IF there are no industry hiccups etc. Mid 2020 will be their time to get on at a legacy and they’ll be in the middle / on the backside of the retirement wave. Timing is everything.
chrisreedrules is offline  
Old 06-06-2019, 07:50 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules View Post
7-8 years to flow isn’t bad historically. Those flowing in 5-6 years (which is not the, “norm”) from the WOs simply timed things well. Nothing more, nothing less. It takes the average pilot 5-6 years to become competitive to be hired at a legacy anyway. Anyone coming from a 1,000-1,500 hour background to the regionals right now should expect it to take 5-8 years to move on IF there are no industry hiccups etc. Mid 2020 will be their time to get on at a legacy and they’ll be in the middle / on the backside of the retirement wave. Timing is everything.


Wow the first logical post I’ve seen here in a while


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
UncreativeUser is offline  
Old 06-06-2019, 09:18 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 537
Default

Originally Posted by UncreativeUser View Post
Wow the first logical post I’ve seen here in a while


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Except you're paying 20k a year for the privilege of possibly flowing if mgt feels like it 2+ years after your peers were already hired ots, if you wait. If not then you just pay 20k a year for nothing.
rld1k is offline  
Old 06-06-2019, 02:02 PM
  #60  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 97
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules View Post
7-8 years to flow isn’t bad historically. Those flowing in 5-6 years (which is not the, “norm”) from the WOs simply timed things well. Nothing more, nothing less. It takes the average pilot 5-6 years to become competitive to be hired at a legacy anyway. Anyone coming from a 1,000-1,500 hour background to the regionals right now should expect it to take 5-8 years to move on IF there are no industry hiccups etc. Mid 2020 will be their time to get on at a legacy and they’ll be in the middle / on the backside of the retirement wave. Timing is everything.
7-8 years to flow may not be bad historically, but let’s not forget and take into consideration that recruitment is blatantly lying to cadets and recruits that they will get 175’s and flow in 5.5 years.

The true time table is exactly that 7.5-8.5 year flow which is far more than 5.5.

My problem here is with recruiting selling and telling blatant lies to prospects and we wonder why we can’t get better compensation.

Every fairly new guy I fly with felt as though as they’ve been lied to and/or swindled and that’s what my main concern is and what needs to be brought to light.

I can’t even be bad at the ones coming in, granted they could do more research of course, but they’re being led as they were blind sheep.
MochaSwirl is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jamesthunder
Envoy Airlines
8
04-05-2019 12:26 PM
CloudSailor
FedEx
96
10-17-2015 07:20 AM
SpreadEagle
Envoy Airlines
22
02-25-2015 04:05 AM
somedayillcare
Envoy Airlines
1
12-10-2014 02:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices