![]() |
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 3110235)
Regarding the HI6, some of you have some thin skins. If you’re doing it correctly, the the message wasn’t directed at you. If you’re not doing it correctly, well, you’ve been told before and deserve the condescending tone.
|
Originally Posted by OffAtTango
(Post 3110234)
It's comical how thirsty this pilot group is for Republics Miami flying. AAG barely has enough cash to stay afloat right now, you are delusional to think that there is any remote chance they will equip your current 175's for EOW. Back when times were "good" and you were taking delivery of new planes, they were not even EOW. Go back to dreaming about opening up LAX.
But just FYI, the cost of equipping planes for EOW is effectively 0. Envoy has the equipment, and manuals ready to go. Paying crews to go jump in a pool is a trivial cost. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3110302)
No-one is hungry to take anyones flying at this time. Apart from a few vocal jackasses, the Compass announcement was sad news for all of us.
But just FYI, the cost of equipping planes for EOW is effectively 0. Envoy has the equipment, and manuals ready to go. Paying crews to go jump in a pool is a trivial cost. |
Originally Posted by OffAtTango
(Post 3110234)
It's comical how thirsty this pilot group is for Republics Miami flying. AAG barely has enough cash to stay afloat right now, you are delusional to think that there is any remote chance they will equip your current 175's for EOW. Back when times were "good" and you were taking delivery of new planes, they were not even EOW. Go back to dreaming about opening up LAX.
All bets are off with how COVID has wreaked havoc on the airlines. AAG will do what they need to make things as cost neutral as possible. Additionally, MQ doesn’t need rafts on the airplanes, only life jackets. 8,000 of them would be sufficient for the fleet, and with all of the 757’s and 767’s that have been parked, I’d be willing to bet there are a lot of them laying around. No trip to the pool is necessary, just a change to the Ops Specs, a CBT or two to the pilots (unpaid as usual because Envoy is kind like that), and it would be done. I am not thirsty” for flying, but given the option between third party contractors and the wholly-owned carriers, I’d much rather see every drop of flying be done by Envoy, PSA, and Piedmont. Since that isn’t realistic, I would take as many efficiencies to the operation that improve things for all involved. |
Originally Posted by HulkaBurger
(Post 3110255)
I think there is one of the latter posting in this thread a few posts above. 😉
|
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 3110377)
Me!? Not at all, I don’t even park over the B gates. It just gets old to see HI6s like this, “expect scrutiny” , if you ask for additional fuel I’ll have a meeting with you and the CP. Former Crj drivers recall this one.
And if our pilots and other employees would do the right thing, maybe they wouldn't need to send those HI6s. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3110390)
That guy got removed from his job real quick.
And if our pilots and other employees would do the right thing, maybe they wouldn't need to send those HI6s. |
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 3110394)
Don’t you think it should be personally addressed to the pilot, and not in a company wide email? And, for the record, he ONLY got removed because the FAA got involved. If it was for the company, CM would still be there.
He got removed before FAA got involved. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3110400)
Spreading rumors i see.
He got removed before FAA got involved. |
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 3110394)
Don’t you think it should be personally addressed to the pilot, and not in a company wide email? And, for the record, he ONLY got removed because the FAA got involved. If it was for the company, CM would still be there.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:46 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands