Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Furlough Protection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2020 | 06:21 PM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 638
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by highfarfast
I will.

Envoy ALPA would have to agree to flowbacks. AA can't just do it because they want to. APA can't just do it because they want to. AA and APA together can't just do it because they want to. With the current situation what it is, it's hard to imagine Envoy ALPA giving in to flowbacks for anything given it could mean almost all of Envoy's pilot group furloughed in a few months as AA furloughs a few thousand pilots (not out of the relm of possibilities).
Allow me to correct one thing:
Everything you said is true IF the “flowbacks” were to go to the top of the list, or integrated into it, or had some special provision where they were guaranteed a CA seat regardless of seniority (this is what screwed up the last flow back clusterf*#k).

If ENY were to hire furloughed AA pilots as new hires with no special seniority provisions, this could be done without input from ALPA. It wouldn’t really hurt anyone here, so I don’t see any reason for us to object anyway. We (ALPA) don’t get a say in who ENY hires. The contract only governs their conditions once they’re on property.
Reply
Old 03-27-2020 | 06:38 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Default

There’s several issues here. There are three wholly owned regionals now. They would all have to take flow backs.

Would you only flow BACK if you had come from that regional? Technically that’s the only way it is an actual flow back. Other wise a flow DOWN, maybe.

AA is giving all sorts of things to the pilots it is displacing. Envoy isn’t even willing to TALK about anything.

I’m sure AA will try and use us as much as possible if they can get away with it. We cost less than mainline and with the current loads, there aren’t a lot of routes we couldn’t fly. But Envoy is having flying cut as well. Just how much we don’t know. Even with flying shifted our way, we will still ultimately need less staffing.
Reply
Old 03-27-2020 | 06:41 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by highfarfast
I will.

Envoy ALPA would have to agree to flowbacks. AA can't just do it because they want to. APA can't just do it because they want to. AA and APA together can't just do it because they want to. With the current situation what it is, it's hard to imagine Envoy ALPA giving in to flowbacks for anything given it could mean almost all of Envoy's pilot group furloughed in a few months as AA furloughs a few thousand pilots (not out of the relm of possibilities).
Envoy wouldn’t be the only accepting flow backs. PSA and Piedmont would have to be in the same boat for a flow back to happen.
Reply
Old 03-27-2020 | 07:42 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by But seriously
Allow me to correct one thing:
Everything you said is true IF the “flowbacks” were to go to the top of the list, or integrated into it, or had some special provision where they were guaranteed a CA seat regardless of seniority (this is what screwed up the last flow back clusterf*#k).

If ENY were to hire furloughed AA pilots as new hires with no special seniority provisions, this could be done without input from ALPA. It wouldn’t really hurt anyone here, so I don’t see any reason for us to object anyway. We (ALPA) don’t get a say in who ENY hires. The contract only governs their conditions once they’re on property.
Oh yeah, of course. But I don't think anyone really would call that "flowback" though. And I have NO problem with the idea of them having guaranteed jobs here, like that, if they furloughed. That said, if they're furloughing, so are we so I don't see the point.
Reply
Old 03-27-2020 | 07:51 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
Envoy wouldn’t be the only accepting flow backs. PSA and Piedmont would have to be in the same boat for a flow back to happen.
Yes, true. There are three. But it's not really relevant. Each regional union mec would need to approve a flowback to their own outfit, but not really all three, which would be REALLY stupid to do in the current situation.

Keep in mind, if anyone approves flowback and AA furloughs, any regional that has flowback will have screwed over its own pilots. I can see an agreement being pulled off in the situation we were in a month ago when we thought hiring was going to go on like gangbusters for a decade plus and WO regionals would need a carrot to hang on to captains. Today though? It's suicide.
Reply
Old 03-28-2020 | 05:14 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Default

An agreement to hire them at the bottom of the list would be pointless. If AA is furloughing then envoy is overstaffed as well. Would an AA pilot really want to come sit airport standby every day with 7-8 days at home as a commuter? I'd rather get a job at Walmart if I were them. Or you know, save some of that pay for an emergency fund.
Reply
Old 03-28-2020 | 06:32 AM
  #37  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 507
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by rld1k
An agreement to hire them at the bottom of the list would be pointless. If AA is furloughing then envoy is overstaffed as well. Would an AA pilot really want to come sit airport standby every day with 7-8 days at home as a commuter? I'd rather get a job at Walmart if I were them. Or you know, save some of that pay for an emergency fund.
If I recall correctly (because I heard this from some 10 yr capt who I flew with as an FO), something like this happened to TWA guys. They did, indeed, sit standby for awhile. One was said to commute into LGA, go into the sleep room, and emerge several days later having never been used. So, whether all this is true or not, don't underestimate what guys will put up with to keep bread on the table.
Reply
Old 03-28-2020 | 07:05 AM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by uavking
If I recall correctly (because I heard this from some 10 yr capt who I flew with as an FO), something like this happened to TWA guys. They did, indeed, sit standby for awhile. One was said to commute into LGA, go into the sleep room, and emerge several days later having never been used. So, whether all this is true or not, don't underestimate what guys will put up with to keep bread on the table.
I’d rather sit stby at Envoy than being furloughed.
Reply
Old 03-28-2020 | 08:25 AM
  #39  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
I’d rather sit stby at Envoy than being furloughed.
speak for yourself.
Reply
Old 03-28-2020 | 09:39 AM
  #40  
SilentLurker's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default Furlough Protection

Originally Posted by Ijustlikeflying
never gonna happen

Not even for a new flow agreement supported by APA, ALPA, AAG to include: WO pilots issued AA seniority # by WO DOH, then DOB for overlaps. Increased flow guarantees such as WO will now make up 75-80% of new AA classes when the music resumes.

I can see the bandwagon now for Flowbacks come Oct 1st. Plenty of time to marinate the idea, let it sink in. Will prevent vertical movement to LLCs/ULLCs with higher margins when the music resumes.


As it stands, the flow has weakened for years to come.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
samballs
Regional
368
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
DeadStick
Mesa Airlines
63
06-07-2009 06:47 AM
GOFRTRS
Cargo
7
01-31-2009 10:52 PM
EGGMAN
Cargo
18
01-01-2008 01:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices