![]() |
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1767170)
Just wait until the seniority lists are merged. 8 year Envoy FO's will be saluting 1 year PSA Captains.
Envoy pilots are in a bind, you have too much heavy weight at the top of your seniority list to survive. Everytime an FO leaves Envoy and your seniority list shrinks, the cost of labor just continues to escalate. The only thing that matters to American is 12/4 that's it, it's the key to everything including your merger. |
It's sad to see that pilots think their salary is the reason a company is uncompetitive.
|
Originally Posted by Tsuda
(Post 1767304)
It's sad to see that pilots think their salary is the reason a company is uncompetitive.
|
Look at Airways/AA proposed rates. I think they can pay regional pilots more.
|
Originally Posted by seafeye
(Post 1767392)
Look at Airways/AA proposed rates. I think they can pay regional pilots more.
The real problem is you the pilot. Airways/AA knows what you are willing to work for so they only offer so much money to the regional to do the flying. As long as you are willing to work for low pay, they are willing pay you low pay. If you collectively say no I'm not willing to work for that kind of money, then they have no choice but to pay higher. That isn't happening with the current crop of pilots. Millenials on the other hand are smarter than the current crop of pilots. They are steering away from the industry because they know better. You can't wish something into existence. What's the incentive for a corporation to give you an employee more money? What leverage do you have? Why should they care? It's no different than a Captain, you think he cares what an FO makes now that he's Captain? He cares only so much as it doesn't impact his earnings and earnings potential. |
Even Kirby mentioned that Airways/AA could save 10's of millions of dollars having regional airlines doing some of their flying. The money is there. Just how we get it is the question.
And to comment on your statement about Mainline carrying more passengers... True, but it will always be cheaper to put 40 passengers on a 50 seat jet than a 70. And 65 on a 70 rather than a 90..... You cannot fill a A380 from FAY to CLT. |
Originally Posted by seafeye
(Post 1767423)
Even Kirby mentioned that Airways/AA could save 10's of millions of dollars having regional airlines doing some of their flying. The money is there. Just how we get it is the question.
And to comment on your statement about Mainline carrying more passengers... True, but it will always be cheaper to put 40 passengers on a 50 seat jet than a 70. And 65 on a 70 rather than a 90..... You cannot fill a A380 from FAY to CLT. If I may, I think you are looking at this situation upside down. Why try to "get it"? Why take on more flying at this level? You know 70 seat airplanes could be flown at the big airlines right? |
Hell I've always thought that anything that is a jet should be at mainline.
Too bad that jet has sailed. |
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1767321)
Considering labor is generally any companies number 1 expense (with fuel costs being an airline exception), maybe you could elaborate on your viewpoint a little for us.
Fuel is the highest cost for airlines and this cost has been dropping steadily, combined with ticket price increases and all kinds of additional fees, all airlines are making record profits. There is no need or justification for any additional concessions by flight crews, and in fact we are long overdue for large increases to finally halt the total destruction of this profession/career. The staffing issues at the lowest paying regionals(look at what's happening at Endeavor), are just getting started, and will only get worse in the coming years. Management has managed to decimate the pay and benefits to the point that no one can justify the huge expense required to become a professional pilot, only to make wages that qualify for food stamps. |
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1767411)
Airways/AA aircraft carry twice the amount of passengers per airplane, essentially twice the revenue per pilot.
|
Originally Posted by AdiosMikeFox
(Post 1767135)
Never mind we were in bankruptcy for that vote and told if we didn't vote yes the judge would cram something worse down our throats. You can drag this horse out and beat it again when we're threatened with shutdown to take a concessionary contract.
|
Originally Posted by bonesbrigade
(Post 1767539)
And yet I've had Eagle pilots get verbal with me in the van after 9e voted in our TA. hmm strange.
Honest question, what part of Eagle's BK contract effected the whole regional industry, like 9e's did? |
Originally Posted by ChickHicks
(Post 1767594)
Honest question, what part of Eagle's BK contract effected the whole regional industry, like 9e's did?
Do you think Eagle's 16 year contract affected other regionals? |
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1767170)
Just wait until the seniority lists are merged. 8 year Envoy FO's will be saluting 1 year PSA Captains.
|
Originally Posted by Paid2fly
(Post 1767530)
Fuel is the highest cost for airlines and this cost has been dropping steadily, combined with ticket price increases and all kinds of additional fees, all airlines are making record profits. There is no need or justification for any additional concessions by flight crews, and in fact we are long overdue for large increases to finally halt the total destruction of this profession/career.
The staffing issues at the lowest paying regionals(look at what's happening at Endeavor), are just getting started, and will only get worse in the coming years. Management has managed to decimate the pay and benefits to the point that no one can justify the huge expense required to become a professional pilot, only to make wages that qualify for food stamps. Parking airplanes does not mean more money for you, it simply means parking airplanes. Running out of pilots does not mean more money for you, it simply means running out of pilots. Bottom line, they are not going to pay you more. They can't give you what they don't have. In any event set your sites higher, its best this entire regional system just close up shop. All these little airplanes are better off being flown by their parent airlines. |
Originally Posted by billyho
(Post 1767532)
Have you ever flown 6 legs with 50 people on the plane each time? Hmmm comes out to 300 people.
|
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1767688)
6 legs on a 737 with 150 people each time is 900 people.
|
Originally Posted by billyho
(Post 1767689)
What mainline carrier does 6 legs? I want to avoid that job....
|
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1767686)
In any event set your sites higher, its best this entire regional system just close up shop. All these little airplanes are better off being flown by their parent airlines.
|
Amen! I would love for it to happen - as would most of us.
Even if the airplane and pay were the same, I would like the chance to work directly for mainline from the beginning and work my way up. |
Originally Posted by fisherman
(Post 1767885)
I completely agree with you on this!!!!!!!
Originally Posted by AboveAndBeyond
(Post 1767890)
Amen! I would love for it to happen - as would most of us.
Even if the airplane and pay were the same, I would like the chance to work directly for mainline from the beginning and work my way up. I've said before, there is a war going on. There will be winners, losers, cowards, and martyrs. Eagle is still fighting the fight, but the real battle is at AA right now on scope. I'm pretty sure who will win this battle, but lets see how it plays out. |
Originally Posted by AnotherEagleGuy
(Post 1767901)
I'm pretty sure who will win this battle, but lets see how it plays out.
|
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1767921)
What is your guess on who wins this battle? I have no idea personally.
I'm sure there is a thread on it in the AA section somewhere. As of last night, APA decided to continue talks. Today should have another announcement of some sort about it. |
Originally Posted by AnotherEagleGuy
(Post 1767901)
Remember, for every PSA or PDT contract, it just means more time spent at a regional as management justifies its means.
|
Originally Posted by billyho
(Post 1767938)
How will this mean more time spent at a regional???
|
Originally Posted by AnotherEagleGuy
(Post 1767947)
I wouldn't expect a YES voting, bar lowering, pilot group to understand that the concept. We already tried to educate your group and failed. Figure it out yourself.
|
Originally Posted by billyho
(Post 1767938)
How will this mean more time spent at a regional???
As long as regionals are way cheaper than mainline and regional pilots are willing to degrade themselves through endless concessions on their already grossly underpaid salaries and largely poor QOL, the regionals will expand at the expense of mainline jobs. It is a tragedy that this isn't patently obvious by now. |
Originally Posted by bedrock
(Post 1768018)
As long as regionals are way cheaper than mainline and regional pilots are willing to degrade themselves through endless concessions on their already grossly underpaid salaries and largely poor QOL, the regionals will expand at the expense of mainline jobs. It is a tragedy that this isn't patently obvious by now.
|
ENVOY presented with details on new contract
It works both ways. No matter how much you try to wash your hands they won't come clean.
Don't try to make someone else responsible. |
Originally Posted by billyho
(Post 1768103)
You mean as long as Mainline Pilots don't give up scope. Don't hate the players, hate the game.
Are the to blame for regional existing? YES Are they to blame for one pilot group undercutting another for SJS? Look no further than the mirror for that answer.
Originally Posted by billyho
(Post 1732724)
Hate to say it but it was time for Piedmont Pilots to start worring about ourselves and let someone else that has some significants fall on the sword.
Originally Posted by billyho
(Post 1726847)
But I along with many won't fall on the sword for anyone else
Originally Posted by billyho
(Post 1712462)
I for one will not fall on my sword for this regional model! This will pass at Piedmont by over 70%. It's done.
|
Without the players the game is impossible. Therefore, I will continue to hate the players.
|
Originally Posted by billyho
(Post 1732724)
Hate to say it but it was time for Piedmont Pilots to start worring about ourselves and let someone else that has some significants fall on the sword.
|
ENVOY presented with details on new contract
Does anybody think they are re shuffling everyone to knock down pay then a merger? This stuff will drive some wacko trying to figure it out! Ha I guess that's why management makes the big bucks!
|
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1767688)
6 legs on a 737 with 150 people each time is 900 people.
@tom11011 |
Originally Posted by Romulus
(Post 1769734)
What about the routes where it's only 30-50 people per leg?
@tom11011 |
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1768182)
Only problem is you don't work for Piedmont.
|
Originally Posted by PDTpilotXX
(Post 1769759)
Yes, he does
|
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1769763)
He used to work for Piedmont.
|
Originally Posted by PDTpilotXX
(Post 1769790)
Whatever you say.
|
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:01 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands