New Envoy Information
#441
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 519
I can say this about Envoy: They seem like a solid company, and ever Envoy pilot to whom I have spoken, either in person or via PM here on APC said if they were to be starting today, they would choose Envoy again. None were happy about the long reserve/upgrade times. I have spoken to 5-yr FOs, and 10-yr CAs, as well as a mix in between. The company has weathered some tough times, and my hat is off to those who toughed it out, believing in the company, and not jumping like a rat from a sinking ship. I am sure many considered it, probably more than once, but those who have stayed have helped the company stay afloat.
And I say all of this having no skin in their game. I have done some of my own math, and personally, I would be very surprised if we don't see much better movement there within the next 6 months, continuing for the next 2-3 years.
And for those talking about FO pay caps at 4 years... compare today's 4 year rate to last year's 4-year rate. To me, a cap makes sense, provided the upward movement actually comes into play. It makes no business sense to incentivize FOs past 4 years (provided that there is room to upgrade). Move up, or get out, I say.
And I say all of this having no skin in their game. I have done some of my own math, and personally, I would be very surprised if we don't see much better movement there within the next 6 months, continuing for the next 2-3 years.
And for those talking about FO pay caps at 4 years... compare today's 4 year rate to last year's 4-year rate. To me, a cap makes sense, provided the upward movement actually comes into play. It makes no business sense to incentivize FOs past 4 years (provided that there is room to upgrade). Move up, or get out, I say.
#443
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
I can say this about Envoy: They seem like a solid company, and ever Envoy pilot to whom I have spoken, either in person or via PM here on APC said if they were to be starting today, they would choose Envoy again. None were happy about the long reserve/upgrade times. I have spoken to 5-yr FOs, and 10-yr CAs, as well as a mix in between. The company has weathered some tough times, and my hat is off to those who toughed it out, believing in the company, and not jumping like a rat from a sinking ship. I am sure many considered it, probably more than once, but those who have stayed have helped the company stay afloat.
And I say all of this having no skin in their game. I have done some of my own math, and personally, I would be very surprised if we don't see much better movement there within the next 6 months, continuing for the next 2-3 years.
And for those talking about FO pay caps at 4 years... compare today's 4 year rate to last year's 4-year rate. To me, a cap makes sense, provided the upward movement actually comes into play. It makes no business sense to incentivize FOs past 4 years (provided that there is room to upgrade). Move up, or get out, I say.
And I say all of this having no skin in their game. I have done some of my own math, and personally, I would be very surprised if we don't see much better movement there within the next 6 months, continuing for the next 2-3 years.
And for those talking about FO pay caps at 4 years... compare today's 4 year rate to last year's 4-year rate. To me, a cap makes sense, provided the upward movement actually comes into play. It makes no business sense to incentivize FOs past 4 years (provided that there is room to upgrade). Move up, or get out, I say.
#444
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
The difference between highest and lowest is 250 per week. You are getting excited about nothing.
#445
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 519
I'm not excited; if anything, I am depressed.
And $250 a week may mean little to you, but to some, it's the difference between barely existing and being comfortable. At the very least, it's a few hotel rooms while on reserve.
And $250 a week may mean little to you, but to some, it's the difference between barely existing and being comfortable. At the very least, it's a few hotel rooms while on reserve.
#446
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 787
Firstclass works for PSA..has never worked for Envoy. Enough said.
#447
By usual sustpects you mean your other Troll names? Who are you today? Thrustlever, Lord Hummus, Eaglefly? You were an idiot then, nothing has changed. Most people know you well enough to not listen to the spew that comes out of your mouth. I just feel sorry for the newer younger members who actually might take you seriously.
#448
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
By usual sustpects you mean your other Troll names? Who are you today? Thrustlever, Lord Hummus, Eaglefly? You were an idiot then, nothing has changed. Most people know you well enough to not listen to the spew that comes out of your mouth. I just feel sorry for the newer younger members who actually might take you seriously.
Tranquilty now, tranquility now, tranquility now.............
#450
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 113
Think of the -$250/month as an insurance policy. If you bust an altitude and get violated, you don't have to explain it in your Delta interview (if you are so lucky to ever get one), as you already have a guaranteed job with AA. If you lose or don't want to keep a log book, you don't have to worry...because you already have a job with AA. If you fail a check ride once, or every year during recurrent, you won't have to explain it in your United interview (if you are lucky enough to ever get one), as you already have a guaranteed job with AA. If you get a few speeding tickets, a bankruptcy, a minor misdemeanor (stuff happens), you don't have to explain it at your FedEx interview....just sayin'!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post