What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?
06-08-2012 | 09:01 AM
#131
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: Gear Slinger
06-08-2012 | 11:52 AM
#132
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
You guys are missing the whole point, there is nothing but good things about to come to our airline. The future is looking good for us. Once Delta votes
In their TA, life is going to be sweet at Expressjet. The regionals are now the new mainline.
In their TA, life is going to be sweet at Expressjet. The regionals are now the new mainline.
06-09-2012 | 09:11 AM
#134
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
He's not to far off, he should have said the Regionals are now the new Domestic carriers of choice for the Legacy's
06-09-2012 | 10:20 AM
#137
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: ERJ145 Captain
Something else no one has mentioned is the terms of the cpa between CAL/UAL and the new XJT. You see folks, J.A. is anything but stupid, when Skywest inc. bought XJT, JA made sure that it would be a long term deal. The public documents released post the announcement of the merger indicate that if they (CAL/UAL) pull one 1 rj, it has to be replaced with something, on a 1 by 1 basis. So for those of you that like it simple:
Per the CPA:
UAL pulls one RJ from the XJT 145's
XJT gets 1 whatever (700, 900, 170, pick your poison).
So I ask again, my fellow embraer drivers at XJT; what's the rush? We're not losing any flying anytime soon, the crj guys are. Let the pieces fall where they may first, then we'll talk shop.
Last edited by goaround2000; 06-09-2012 at 10:30 AM.
06-09-2012 | 11:31 AM
#138
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: A320
Difference is CAL/UAL use an rj where a 737 should go, and a 73 where a 75 should go, and so on.
Something else no one has mentioned is the terms of the cpa between CAL/UAL and the new XJT. You see folks, J.A. is anything but stupid, when Skywest inc. bought XJT, JA made sure that it would be a long term deal. The public documents released post the announcement of the merger indicate that if they (CAL/UAL) pull one 1 rj, it has to be replaced with something, on a 1 by 1 basis. So for those of you that like it simple:
Per the CPA:
UAL pulls one RJ from the XJT 145's
XJT gets 1 whatever (700, 900, 170, pick your poison).
So I ask again, my fellow embraer drivers at XJT; what's the rush? We're not losing any flying anytime soon, the crj guys are. Let the pieces fall where they may first, then we'll talk shop.
Something else no one has mentioned is the terms of the cpa between CAL/UAL and the new XJT. You see folks, J.A. is anything but stupid, when Skywest inc. bought XJT, JA made sure that it would be a long term deal. The public documents released post the announcement of the merger indicate that if they (CAL/UAL) pull one 1 rj, it has to be replaced with something, on a 1 by 1 basis. So for those of you that like it simple:
Per the CPA:
UAL pulls one RJ from the XJT 145's
XJT gets 1 whatever (700, 900, 170, pick your poison).
So I ask again, my fellow embraer drivers at XJT; what's the rush? We're not losing any flying anytime soon, the crj guys are. Let the pieces fall where they may first, then we'll talk shop.
I thought it was a 1:2? ie, one 700/900 for 2 50's? Either way, I think we will be ok.
06-09-2012 | 11:34 AM
#139
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: ERJ145 Captain
Difference is CAL/UAL use an rj where a 737 should go, and a 73 where a 75 should go, and so on.
Something else no one has mentioned is the terms of the cpa between CAL/UAL and the new XJT. You see folks, J.A. is anything but stupid, when Skywest inc. bought XJT, JA made sure that it would be a long term deal. The public documents released post the announcement of the merger indicate that if they (CAL/UAL) pull one 1 rj, it has to be replaced with something, on a 1 by 1 basis. So for those of you that like it simple:
Per the CPA:
UAL pulls one RJ from the XJT 145's
XJT gets 1 whatever (700, 900, 170, pick your poison).
So I ask again, my fellow embraer drivers at XJT; what's the rush? We're not losing any flying anytime soon, the crj guys are. Let the pieces fall where they may first, then we'll talk shop.
Something else no one has mentioned is the terms of the cpa between CAL/UAL and the new XJT. You see folks, J.A. is anything but stupid, when Skywest inc. bought XJT, JA made sure that it would be a long term deal. The public documents released post the announcement of the merger indicate that if they (CAL/UAL) pull one 1 rj, it has to be replaced with something, on a 1 by 1 basis. So for those of you that like it simple:
Per the CPA:
UAL pulls one RJ from the XJT 145's
XJT gets 1 whatever (700, 900, 170, pick your poison).
So I ask again, my fellow embraer drivers at XJT; what's the rush? We're not losing any flying anytime soon, the crj guys are. Let the pieces fall where they may first, then we'll talk shop.
I thought it was a 1:2? ie, one 700/900 for 2 50's? Either way, I think we will be ok.
06-09-2012 | 11:43 AM
#140
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: FO
Since our contracts are not a single list yet, if ASA needs to furlough will it come from the junior EMB guys?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
