Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet? >

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-2012 | 03:13 PM
  #231  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hemaybedid
This legacy ASA guy listened to and spoke with an MEC rep in ATL and I fully expect a concessionary contract for both sides, even though we have more leverage now than possibly ever before. Their only concern, as I see it, is a few bucks for the senior guys and continuing the measly 1% raise a year for those same guys topped out on the scale. I explained to one of those guys the other day that every year he's losing atleast 2% in purchasing power per dollar. His retort was "well, 1% is quite a bit of money when your topped out on the scale". This is what we have to deal with in this sector of the industry :/
Most everyone I've spoken to on the Xjet side wouldn't put up with this at all, regardless of whether a 12 year captain or 1 year FO.
Old 06-20-2012 | 03:17 PM
  #232  
Red97Vette's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: UniCal 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Banshee365
It just so happens that the 50 seat issue is happening in the Delta world rather than the United world. Don't think for a minute United is exempt from this and expect United to follow Delta's footsteps. It's easy to sit on your "secure" high horse and talk trash about our Delta flying but we've been operating mostly nothing but Delta for over 30 years so the games that go on are not new to us. If the 50 seat possibilities were on the United side you wouldn't be smiling so much over there would you?

Bottom line is that anything that happens in the Delta system is also your problem, that much is 100% certain. I understand the shooting for the moon concept and applaud you guy's for being that way as I think it will push the unions to go after good things for us while still remaining reasonable in the business aspect. If you're looking to get paid 120 hrs while working 30 then you REALLY need to work on your expectations. I don't mind working for my money but certainly want things in the contract to protect the pilot group from abuse.

P.S. Pardon me from not reading red's post before posting as my view's reflect some of the same posted in his reply.
Very well put
Old 06-20-2012 | 03:49 PM
  #233  
Not A Janitor
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Banshee365
It just so happens that the 50 seat issue is happening in the Delta world rather than the United world. Don't think for a minute United is exempt from this and expect United to follow Delta's footsteps. It's easy to sit on your "secure" high horse and talk trash about our Delta flying but we've been operating mostly nothing but Delta for over 30 years so the games that go on are not new to us. If the 50 seat possibilities were on the United side you wouldn't be smiling so much over there would you?
Not to mention, nothing says ASA is going to lose a bunch of Delta airframes. In fact, signs point to us being the biggest benefactor of the DL TA among the regionals, which won't even start affecting the RJs until late next year, and at that point it won't be more of a trickle than flood of RJ retirements.

CHQ and CMR 50-seaters are coming off lease in the next couple years, so there's ~40 or so airframes gone without any 76-seater swaps. There are 16 Pinnacle 900s to place somewhere before the additional 76-seaters are even ordered. And SKYW, with its cash reserves, superior credit and leverage with both Bombardier and Embraer, is in a position to (and recent media reports suggest they will) place a sizable order for RJs in the near future. These could be a large chunk of the 102 76-seaters that Delta will be adding to the fleet over the next five to six years. (Which would benefit Delta, as they're trying to keep their debt load <$10B. Keeping a large RJ order off their own books would work toward that end.)

Delta basically controls Pinnacle, so there's a big question mark as as to whether their 200's will even get swapped out for larger airframes, or on a favorable ratio if they do. Who else would get those new 900's? GoJetz? No, considering their lack of leverage, operational performance, etc etc. Mesa? Delta got burned there a couple times already. RAH? Nope.

Not saying things will be sunshine and lollipops at ASA, but all this fear-mongering by the XJT side about the Delta TA is completely unwarranted. No one knows how the Delta TA stuff will play out. It could be a disaster, it could be a huge boon. So, chill the fu(k out and wait and see. There's no reason to harpoon a TA just because of fear-mongering by a few. And there won't be any sacrificing of the most junior XJT pilots (who, by the way, were hired by ASA post merger and therefore are junior to all ASA pilots) to furloughs. It's amazing to see the fear and misinformation coming out of the pmXJT side.
Old 06-20-2012 | 06:14 PM
  #234  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Default

The same thing WILL BE going on at United's side..... very, very soon....... The longer they stall, the more money THEY put in their pockets. Period. ExpressJet is trying to get extensions on the airframes already!!!! What does that tell you? There is NO replacement aircraft......... Keep dragging the contract along till they're parked.......

Call someone in the know about the airframe serial numbers and hours/cycles.........

TOAST!!!!!!!!!!!

FOOLS!!!!!!!!!!
Old 06-21-2012 | 04:43 AM
  #235  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MR JT8D
The same thing WILL BE going on at United's side..... very, very soon....... The longer they stall, the more money THEY put in their pockets. Period. ExpressJet is trying to get extensions on the airframes already!!!! What does that tell you? There is NO replacement aircraft......... Keep dragging the contract along till they're parked.......

Call someone in the know about the airframe serial numbers and hours/cycles.........

TOAST!!!!!!!!!!!

FOOLS!!!!!!!!!!




How do I verify the credentials of "someone in the know"?

PANCAKES!!!!!!

DUNDERHEAD!!!!


...I can punctuate and breakfast items and unwise people too
Old 06-21-2012 | 04:52 AM
  #236  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 5
From: 737 Left
Default

Originally Posted by captain beefy
[/B]


How do I verify the credentials of "someone in the know"?

PANCAKES!!!!!!

DUNDERHEAD!!!!


...I can punctuate and breakfast items and unwise people too
+1!!!!!!!!!!
Old 06-21-2012 | 05:08 AM
  #237  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MR JT8D
The same thing WILL BE going on at United's side..... very, very soon....... The longer they stall, the more money THEY put in their pockets. Period. ExpressJet is trying to get extensions on the airframes already!!!! What does that tell you? There is NO replacement aircraft......... Keep dragging the contract along till they're parked.......

Call someone in the know about the airframe serial numbers and hours/cycles.........

TOAST!!!!!!!!!!!

FOOLS!!!!!!!!!!
I think you may have a stuck key or two, possibly the period and exclamation point. Might want to get that checked out.
Old 06-21-2012 | 10:23 AM
  #238  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Talking

Originally Posted by Red97Vette
Wow.

1. The TA hasn't even passed yet.
2. Even if it does no one knows who's 200's are going to be parked, or how many from each carrier. So me being on the "street" isnt going to happen. In my situation over 50% of ASA would need to be parked.
3. The TA calls for an increase in 70 and 76 seat aircraft (not as many to offset the loss of the 200's buts its a step in the right direction).
4. You act as if United will forever be in love with your old 50 seat ERJ's. EVERYONE knows 50 seat airplanes are going to be parked and larger RJs are the future, its economics. Hmmmm, isnt ALL of L-XJT's airplanes 50 seaters? I'd be concerned... (dont expect all your 50's to be replaced with larger airframes overnight, when they start shedding the 50's you will be in ASA's position, possibly shrinking)
5. The TA that Delta is proposing isnt out of left field. The wind down of the 200 flying was going to happen, everyone knew it and has for a while.
6. Continental pilots want all their outsourced flying back. Their union (also ALPA) was pushing to retract all your flying pre merger with United. You act as if your contract is iron clad and there are no exceptions that allow for a decrease in your airframes (either a strait reduction or a 2 for 1 or worse, etc type deal). Nothing is certain other than the dumb fat and highest paid pilots in the regional sector usually dont sit there forever. Then have fun on the "street."


Have fun "digging in" and "getting ready for battle." You sound like like a 5 year old kid in a candy store crying to his mommy. Everyone wishes you'd just S T F U.

In my above post I was making a logical observation and drawing some obvious conclusions. Have fun "digging in" though.

I don't agree with anything you said less the fact that CAL is trying to bring all the 50 seat flying in house or what ever airplane it is. You guys sit down there up managements a$$ thinking this company need us to play ball, they need us more then we need them and if you don't see that well then your blind. Is the 50 gonna go away? Your dam right it is, (second point I agree to)but not till this CPA is up or CAL buys it out. I'm sorry but you just cant cancel contracts without due diligence by the party which seeks to end the agreement.

I'll gladly take my spot flying at a legacy when and if this company goes down but till then seeing as I'm gonna be here for a while, I'm gonna strive to continue the fight for what we all as professional pilots deserve. EVERY DOLLAR WE CAN GET, and when we we do secure an industry leading contract for you again! Well, I would just rather you say thanks and enjoy the fruits of mine and everyone's lobar that puts up the good fight. You people are the reason were considered second class pilots and mocked by our peers. If you want to insure the company survives and i'm sure you do that sticker that says 'I Will Fly For Food" is right up your alley.
Old 06-21-2012 | 10:36 AM
  #239  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Auto
Default

Originally Posted by XJT Pilot
I don't agree with anything you said less the fact that CAL is trying to bring all the 50 seat flying in house or what ever airplane it is. You guys sit down there up managements a$$ thinking this company need us to play ball, they need us more then we need them and if you don't see that well then your blind. Is the 50 gonna go away? Your dam right it is, (second point I agree to)but not till this CPA is up or CAL buys it out. I'm sorry but you just cant cancel contracts without due diligence by the party which seeks to end the agreement.

I'll gladly take my spot flying at a legacy when and if this company goes down but till then seeing as I'm gonna be here for a while, I'm gonna strive to continue the fight for what we all as professional pilots deserve. EVERY DOLLAR WE CAN GET, and when we we do secure an industry leading contract for you again! Well, I would just rather you say thanks and enjoy the fruits of mine and everyone's lobar that puts up the good fight. You people are the reason were considered second class pilots and mocked by our peers. If you want to insure the company survives and i'm sure you do that sticker that says 'I Will Fly For Food" is right up your alley.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
And that is why Expressjet legacy guys are so Fing awesome! That is the attitude ASA guys need to adopt.
XJTpilot,
My thoughts exactly.
Old 06-21-2012 | 05:07 PM
  #240  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Sounds like the best thing you guys have over ASA is that anything added if your below 75 gets added on top (We need this) and the 3 hour max deduct for conflicting trips going into the next month (We need this too). Otherwise with our PBS I used one week vacation and blocked only 33 hours for the month and got paid 75 (one 3 day and one 4 day). Now this then makes it impossible to pick anything up because it gets added to the 33 hours of block I was at. So I would essentially need to work 42 hours for "free." Aside from that I'd say I could easily get 40 off in a row if I paired up 2 months consecutively doing this (but two 75 hours months would mean a crappy pay check).
Also, I dont see combining the very best of our two contracts into one happening. I'd LOVE for this to happen, but this would be a contract that would destroy any other regional out there and I suspect our costs would be comparatively too high. (Good luck getting on GoJet or Pinchanickle or RAH's levels when it comes time for an RFP). Pilot pay can't BK a company, but in the regional world I can see it making us relatively more costly, and thus not making us competitive in our industry. That CAN lead to a BK or stagnation over time. Im not a lifer (just sayin) but lets just get this contract done and enjoy some more flying.....
It's not 3 hours, our line value is actually protected within +/-2hours in the transition.

I thought that with your vacation low, your 7 vacation days are credited at 4 hours each and you have to build a line to at least 65 hours. That is a difference of 37 hours. So how did you manage to only block 33 hours?

As for your duty rigs, I've been calculating what the difference in pay would be for me if we had your duty rig, so far it's less than one hour since the merger announcement (I almost always only work 4 days). It proved my theory that for us, it's not all that it's cracked up to be. Now if it was based on actual and not scheduled, then I would agree that that would be way better than what we currently have. Also, I wouldn't be happy with anything less than a 1:3.6 trip rig to go along with the duty rig.

As for soft time, people forget other MAJOR parts of our contract. Such as FBO, our higher 401k matching, our retirement contribution, our higher sick accrual, our OJI bank, our higher vacation accrual, our lower health benefit share of premiums (25%), and some minor ones like customs and drug test pay, uniform reimbursement (includes more than uniforms). And I know I'm probably forgetting things.

As for your comments about not getting at least the best of both contracts, they can cry poor all they want but just remember that they are choosing to pay for TWO sets of everything!

4. You act as if United will forever be in love with your old 50 seat ERJ's. EVERYONE knows 50 seat airplanes are going to be parked and larger RJs are the future, its economics. Hmmmm, isnt ALL of L-XJT's airplanes 50 seaters? I'd be concerned... (dont expect all your 50's to be replaced with larger airframes overnight, when they start shedding the 50's you will be in ASA's position, possibly shrinking)

6. Continental pilots want all their outsourced flying back. Their union (also ALPA) was pushing to retract all your flying pre merger with United. You act as if your contract is iron clad and there are no exceptions that allow for a decrease in your airframes (either a strait reduction or a 2 for 1 or worse, etc type deal). Nothing is certain other than the dumb fat and highest paid pilots in the regional sector usually dont sit there forever. Then have fun on the "street."
Actually, the CAL CPA says that XJT will get the first 75 replacement aircraft, 1 for 1.

Last edited by Nevets; 06-21-2012 at 05:30 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
12579
Career Questions
44
12-02-2015 11:46 AM
aircraftdriver
Major
15
03-07-2008 09:59 AM
threegreen
Regional
22
02-22-2008 05:33 PM
worldliner777
Major
13
02-22-2008 07:11 AM
skywarrior
Regional
3
11-02-2005 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices