Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet? >

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2012 | 12:29 PM
  #331  
Red97Vette's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: UniCal 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by JustAnotherPLT
Breaking News *News Flash*

This just in from the mouths of the all knowing. Oh and the training department too. (sarcasm in case you couldn't tell)

Training Dept - Extended over water ops on some of the 50s. This has already started.

All Knowing - CRJ side will be the first to take a 2 for 1 deal on aircraft we lease. I'm hearing around 20-30. Those airplanes will then be transfered to AA out of Miami. The 70s or 90s will be DTW based.

And in other news the Lotto is up to 86 million.

Cheers
Does this birdie also say if the 50's that are going to fly for AMR are operated by ASA or Eagle or someone else?
Old 07-02-2012 | 12:47 PM
  #332  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by What
You guys are to funny, in the last 2 pages you guys are trading in airplanes that are flown under Delta for airplanes to fly under AA, then you will grab your older 50 seaters and trade them with pinnacle's... Ha ha, also for over water you guys need more than just a video, need ditching training as well as other things! As far as the distance well it's what the CO and the FAA come up with but normally is The distance that an engine can take you for an hr!
No ditching training require for extended over water ops, the only training that is required is that crew members set instruction and demo life vest usage. Also a life vest for each passenger on the plane. I remember watching some video, but that was years ago.

There are some procedures that are train by memo, like route or A/C requirements (flight conducted above FL250, within 162nm of shore between such and such Latitudes), as well as having the flig attendants brief pax on life vest usage before traveling greater than 50nm off shore.

Not a big deal from a line pilots point of view.
Old 07-02-2012 | 12:50 PM
  #333  
todd1200's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 2
Default

I fly with a lot of guys who have been here 20+ years and it doesn't surprise me when they are afraid to rock the boat -- but why in the world would FOs making 30-40k be worried about a "sustainable" contract? Why does everyone complain about pay, scheduling, and the general way we are treated by the company, but as soon as there is an opportunity to work toward improvements, we allow fear and negativity to overcome reason. Jerry & Co. know how to make money, so why don't we let them worry about that, while we all work toward improving our own situation. I'm afraid our expectations have been so thoroughly managed that we've actually become convinced that the way we're treated is for our own good.
Old 07-02-2012 | 01:02 PM
  #334  
Red97Vette's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: UniCal 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by todd1200
I fly with a lot of guys who have been here 20+ years and it doesn't surprise me when they are afraid to rock the boat -- but why in the world would FOs making 30-40k be worried about a "sustainable" contract? Why does everyone complain about pay, scheduling, and the general way we are treated by the company, but as soon as there is an opportunity to work toward improvements, we allow fear and negativity to overcome reason. Jerry & Co. know how to make money, so why don't we let them worry about that, while we all work toward improving our own situation. I'm afraid our expectations have been so thoroughly managed that we've actually become convinced that the way we're treated is for our own good.
the FO's are worried about a sustainable contract because we have NO interest in being 10 year FO's and we want nothing better than to get out of this god forsaken regional industry. Most captains around this place were able to upgrade between 2 - 4 years, now its 7+, if you cant understand why we want growth and expansion, then you have gotten too comfortable being a lifer captain.
Old 07-02-2012 | 01:06 PM
  #335  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Red97Vette
Does this birdie also say if the 50's that are going to fly for AMR are operated by ASA or Eagle or someone else?
I don't think we would continue to lease the airplanes for other pilots to fly. It would be us if this is true.
Old 07-02-2012 | 01:51 PM
  #336  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Red97Vette
Does this birdie also say if the 50's that are going to fly for AMR are operated by ASA or Eagle or someone else?
The birdies in the training department and the guys who write our manuals have no clue why they are being asked to do so, but our -200 department is being set up so that we can perform extended over water operations. We can obviously let the rumor mill fly on from there!
Old 07-02-2012 | 01:52 PM
  #337  
goaround2000's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: ERJ145 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Red97Vette
the FO's are worried about a sustainable contract because we have NO interest in being 10 year FO's and we want nothing better than to get out of this god forsaken regional industry. Most captains around this place were able to upgrade between 2 - 4 years, now its 7+, if you cant understand why we want growth and expansion, then you have gotten too comfortable being a lifer captain.
I use to think the same way when I was an f/o. The problem with your theory is that you're willing to trade growth for anything (please see gojets), but you don't take into account the possibility that even with growth the list can still stagnate and you would be left to work under a ****ty contract. Upgrade on the crj side is close to 7 years as you mentioned, and even if the lists were integrated today; you'd still have fences and other protections. You're also making the assumption that upgrading will guarantee you a job at a major shortly thereafter, another rookie mistake, look at the past 10 years in this industry. It's in the best interest of all to have a leading contract, profitability is up to management.
Old 07-02-2012 | 02:27 PM
  #338  
What's Avatar
Underpaid...
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
From: French-Canadian
Default

Originally Posted by gtechpilot
The birdies in the training department and the guys who write our manuals have no clue why they are being asked to do so, but our -200 department is being set up so that we can perform extended over water operations. We can obviously let the rumor mill fly on from there!
Just me thinking out loud, let's say that is for AA flying... The Bahamas don't require overwater ops neither does EYW! So if it was to take the flying from Eagle in MIA I don't see a reason (the birds Eagle have in MIA don't have the rafts since we don't serve any routes that require it) If it was to take the flying for Eagle in SJU, the -200 can't get in and out of the airports that AMR would need Tortolla and Dominica. Also Eagle is certified for overwater ops but the life rafts have been removed so we must comply with the 50 nm of any pebble! How would the 200 do with all the life rafts on board? I mean what performance penalty would it take?
Old 07-02-2012 | 02:28 PM
  #339  
Not A Janitor
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Default

The Delta TA passed a few days ago, and when I came to work today all the 50-seaters had vanished just like the ERJ pilots warned us!

The only thing that suggests PMASA will lose tons of airframes and furlough and downgrade over the three-year scope transition period is the ignorance-flavored kool-aid coming out of the Houston ALPA offices.
Old 07-02-2012 | 02:57 PM
  #340  
Not A Janitor
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by goaround2000
Let's see if can be clear enough with you and all the other institutionalized pilots on the CRJ side:

IT IS NOT THE JOB OF THE PILOTS TO KEEP THE COMPANY PROFITABLE, IT IS MANAGEMENT'S JOB.

Therein the two differences in cultures. The crj side is drowning in the kool aid, and yet no one can publicly post any numbers that support that the ERJ contract (and further gains) are not cost effective. On the ERJ side we understand that the job of the pilot is to fly the aircraft safely within company policies and guidelines, not keeping the company afloat, Jerry gets paid a lot more money than we do to manage this "thuper" regional.

Alright, EDITED BY ACL, let's look at a couple case studies in which the unions ended up shooting themselves in the foot with this mentality.

The Boeing machinists union has for decades been a very hostile/greedy group that chanted that very line about how the company should keep itself profitable but they also deserve huge wage hikes. The two are mutually exclusive, and the union discovered that the hard way when their jobs were sent to non-union workers in South Carolina. Oops. Maybe they should have played ball so they could keep their jobs.

The auto industry was brought down mainly by greedy unions. We don't need to go into detail because everyone knows how well compensated auto machinists were when they helped cause GM and Chrysler to go tango uniform.

Yes, it's the pilots jobs to look out for themselves, but not to the extent that it brings the company down. Obviously the company would never sign a TA that would put it out of business. But say--hypothetically--some XJTALPA-flavored kool-aid drinkers are able to organize pilots to defeat a reasonable, competitive TA (hypothetically, since we don't know whether the TA will be reasonable or competitive yet, because we haven't read it, and therefore we can't legitimately say whether we'll vote yes or no), the company will either have to waste a lot of time negotiating a new TA that raises our costs significantly and prices us--and our jobs--out of the market, or continue with the status quo which may end with the same result for one or both pre-merger sides.

Yes, airline pilots deserve to be paid more than they are, and yes we deserve mainline-style work rules at the regionals. But we are living in reality, not a Democrat/left-wing dreamland where we get everything we deserve. There are snakes in the grass in the form of shady ultra low cost regionals (e.g., BlowJetz) that will take our flying in an instant if we price ourselves out of the market. And then you won't have your "snapback" because you don't even have a job.

And believe me, knowing Jerry and the St George gang, things will surely *not* work out in PMXJT's and reacharound's favor if they scuttle the TA. That's just the reality of the situation.

Last edited by acl65pilot; 07-02-2012 at 05:25 PM. Reason: Tos
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
12579
Career Questions
44
12-02-2015 11:46 AM
aircraftdriver
Major
15
03-07-2008 09:59 AM
threegreen
Regional
22
02-22-2008 05:33 PM
worldliner777
Major
13
02-22-2008 07:11 AM
skywarrior
Regional
3
11-02-2005 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices