L-ASA (ExpressJet CRJ side)
#1071
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
#1072
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 293
Likes: 4
From: 767 FO
#1073
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
#1074
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
The point is that just because a company is privately held doesn't mean that normal economic principles / rationale applies.
In turn it is irrelevant whether they are public or not.
And to the original point - Air Wiskey obviously can generate a return at a smaller scale.
XJT could probably do the same - but not without some very painful re-org.
#1079
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
The statement about being unviable below 100 planes is true. It’s because of our expenses. The leases on multiple hangers, equipment, IT infrastructure, levels of management and staff etc. The airline is setup for larger scale operations. Bring the revenue centers (airplanes) to less than 100 with the current setup, and XJT will have issues.
#1080
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: lav dumper
If they don’t act soon it’s going to be too little too late. I have a feeling a mass exodus is going to happen once bonus checks are received. Curious to hear what kind stuff they’ll spew on the conference call later. Always a lot of words spoken with not much being said.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



