Search
Notices

FDX-Fruitful Week?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2015, 07:52 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 498
Default

Can we get our "retro"/signing bonus paid into our 401k as company contributions instead of as pay where we are taxed on it?
kwri10s is offline  
Old 08-17-2015, 09:10 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 322
Default

Originally Posted by Busdrivr View Post
I thought we'd agreed on almost every section of the contract. What could this be about?

I'm guessing retirement.
Full pull is offline  
Old 08-17-2015, 09:25 PM
  #113  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by Busdrivr View Post

What could this be about?

Fear of mass exodus.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 08-18-2015, 02:51 AM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoHaz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: let it snow, let it snow, let it snow
Posts: 828
Default

[QUOTE=TonyC;1951353]Fear of mass exodus.

I think there will be one either way. Big group waiting to see what they might get but they'll either take any new benefits they waited for or shrug their shoulders and retire anyway. Maybe there will be a "delay-retirement-till-after-peak bonus" clause to help manage current manning shortage.
NoHaz is offline  
Old 08-18-2015, 04:41 AM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 113
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer View Post
Before we sign a deal, we need to make sure there is at least a 3%, maybe 4% pay raise each year past the amendable date. I am tired of the company paying a signing bonus that is a pittance of what I am owed in retro pay. That might also make the company less likely to drag it out so long, if they are forced to give annual pay bumps during the company extended drag out process.
This all day everyday x 1000.
Purpletailed10 is offline  
Old 08-18-2015, 05:27 AM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Right for a long time
Posts: 298
Default

Originally Posted by Purpletailed10 View Post
This all day everyday x 1000.
Why would any company agree to pay a 3-4% penalty past amenable date? Can't the unified labor group just decide to not agree to the terms of a new contract and be happy with the old rules and a 3-4% bump? I'm all for it but...I'm also for reality. Does anybody ever actually get this written into a contract?
VSTOLG4 is offline  
Old 08-18-2015, 05:42 AM
  #117  
Line Holder
 
Flybywyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 52
Default

Originally Posted by VSTOLG4 View Post
Does anybody ever actually get this written into a contract?
No, never.
Flybywyr is offline  
Old 08-18-2015, 05:43 AM
  #118  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by NoHaz View Post

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post

Fear of mass exodus.7

I think there will be one either way. Big group waiting to see what they might get but they'll either take any new benefits they waited for or shrug their shoulders and retire anyway. Maybe there will be a "delay-retirement-till-after-peak bonus" clause to help manage current manning shortage.

Yepp, either way, I see a very large group of retirement-ready folks pulling the plug when we get a TA, and I think The Company must fear the possibility, even the probability of not being able to man all the jets.

Fair to mediocre TA, and lots of loiterers will kick themselves for waiting so long to retire. A good or better TA, and lots of part-timers will pat themselves on the back for sticking it out, stick around just long enough to grab a signing bonus, and ride off into the sunset. Either way, jets will quickly outnumber captains.

Any one-time bonus to get us beyond peak will only kick the can down the road a bit. We need something more durable to stabilize the departures and give The Company the predictability it craves.

My suggestion: give the pilot a financial incentive to announce his retirement in advance. The pilot gives 1 year notice of planned retirement, he receives one amount, 6 months notice is rewarded with 60% of that amount, 3 months gets 30%. The amount? Why not tap into the deferred compensation the pilot has already earned? The pilot has already earned his sick leave and disability account, and The Company already carries that on its balance sheet as a liability. Why not let the pilot have what he has already earned?

The Company gets relief from the uncertainty of when a pilot will retire, and the pilot gets the money he has already earned. Additionally, The Company gets a more productive pilot in his final months and weeks. Some might call this a Win-Win-Win.

Of course, unforseen circumstances or life events might require the pilot to change his mind about his planned retirement date, so he gets a chance to retire sooner or later, but he might forfeit the benefit of early declaration. If the new date is later than the original, he still has a chance to declare and receive the "retirement announcement bonus." However, if he decides to retire sooner, he may only be able to receive the RAB for a shorter announcement-retirement term.

There are probably other solutions, but until a real solution is implemented, The Company has a strong motivation to delay the deal.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 08-18-2015, 06:15 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airbum's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 652
Default

Originally Posted by VSTOLG4 View Post
Why would any company agree to pay a 3-4% penalty past amenable date? Can't the unified labor group just decide to not agree to the terms of a new contract and be happy with the old rules and a 3-4% bump? I'm all for it but...I'm also for reality. Does anybody ever actually get this written into a contract?
Ups had a one year bump of 4% after the contract became amendable. It however was a one time thing. Four years later it looks like it was not enough
Airbum is offline  
Old 08-18-2015, 06:20 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

No need for that foolishness Tony, we can just hire off the street and pump out a new 75/76 FO in….ah…um….apparently 6-8 months. (Never mind….)

Many of this board went to the RAG, became a Navy fighter pilot, and got CQ'd in less time than that. Our F-15 syllabus ran just a bit under 6 months on the AF side of things. I think C-17 school is less than 6 months for a new guy as well.

We need sims, instructors, leadership…and a lot more than just a contract to fix all of this. I hope we get all of it.
Albief15 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
viperdriver
Cargo
13
12-15-2011 06:35 PM
charleyvarrick
Cargo
34
08-27-2011 11:10 AM
beatupsuitcase
Cargo
56
08-22-2011 11:07 PM
DinoJet727
Cargo
46
05-02-2008 01:42 PM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
29
02-02-2007 06:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices