Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Foreign
Emirates road show in the USA! >

Emirates road show in the USA!

Search
Notices
Foreign Airlines that hire U.S. pilots

Emirates road show in the USA!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2010, 09:53 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Dominican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 747 captain
Posts: 1,549
Default

Guys a perspective for what I am hearing out on the contract world, they are having a LOT of problems finding qualified individuals (people with heavy jet time, Trans continental time etc.) the vast majority of their applications are from people that barely meet their minimums, I suspect that the requirements will be dropped significantly relatively soon. Do your homework on EMIRATES though, don't sign on the dotted line until you talk extensively with some of the pilots, visit the watering holes when you are there etc. The rumor is that they will start taking DEC's again and that will trump the perspectives for upgrade quite a bit.
The Dominican is offline  
Old 07-16-2010, 10:13 AM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: Clear Right 320
Posts: 79
Default

The majority of US regional pilots fly the the e145. Isn't it over 30tons? Are they going by BOW or MTOW?
grdprox is offline  
Old 07-16-2010, 11:08 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

Hi!

The majority of US regional pilots fly the the e145. Isn't it over 30tons? Are they going by BOW or MTOW?
Normally, spelling doesn't matter, as long as the reader understands what the writer was thinking. In this case, however, a misspelling made the reader misunderstand the writer.

As I found out, in international ops LOTS of stuff is metric:
It is NOT 30 TONS. It is 30 TONNES.

30 Tonnes = 66,000+ pounds, so all of the ERJ-135/145/CRJ-200 hours do not qualify.

On the other hand, I have read, on a number of posts, that Pinnacle guys have already been hired this year, with small RJ time only.

With reference to DECs (Direct Entry Captains), a number of RJ guys were reported to have been hired as DECs in past years.

I have read 12 months jet current (on the other hand have also read of turboprop-only guys being hired...I think it was large turboprops).

cliff
LFW
atpcliff is offline  
Old 07-16-2010, 01:12 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: The Far Side
Posts: 968
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff View Post
Hi!

Normally, spelling doesn't matter, as long as the reader understands what the writer was thinking. In this case, however, a misspelling made the reader misunderstand the writer.

As I found out, in international ops LOTS of stuff is metric:
It is NOT 30 TONS. It is 30 TONNES.

30 Tonnes = 66,000+ pounds, so all of the ERJ-135/145/CRJ-200 hours do not qualify.
Well put and great point, but to clarify a bit ... tonne = metric ton = 1000 kg (kg force, technically) = 2204.62 lb (lb force).

So my F28-1000 time wouldn't qualify (65000 lb). My F28-4000 time would (73000 lb). Very arbitrary.
rotorhead1026 is offline  
Old 07-16-2010, 01:42 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Thanks all for clarifying the weights. I didn't see that on the web site. Fortunately, the CRJ-700 and -900 are both OK (for me anyway). CRJ-200 bad.
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 07-16-2010, 02:17 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

Yeah, with the 55 tonne limit, a DC-9-34/-40/-50 are all exclueded. Their normal MGTOW is 121,000 lbs, while 55 tonnes is 122,000 lbs. I'm 99% sure that EK did it on purpose to exclude those airframes (and it probably also excludes the 737-200).
atpcliff is offline  
Old 07-16-2010, 05:17 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: The Far Side
Posts: 968
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff View Post
Yeah, with the 55 tonne limit, a DC-9-34/-40/-50 are all exclueded. Their normal MGTOW is 121,000 lbs, while 55 tonnes is 122,000 lbs. I'm 99% sure that EK did it on purpose to exclude those airframes (and it probably also excludes the 737-200).
I don't know whether it was on purpose or not (a lot of their employees think they're too stupid to do this, or stupid enough TO do it). Whatever the reason, they're paying a big price, it seems.
rotorhead1026 is offline  
Old 07-16-2010, 08:40 PM
  #38  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 7
Default

Well the weirdest thing at the application about the type of plane that you are flying is that they have the crj listed as: crj100/200/700/900.....So you can't split the time between 200 and 700 or 900... one plane is below 30t and the other is more....!!! I think that might be the confusing part with some of the rj pilots being rejected...(had couple beers in order to figure that out !!!)
Royalblue is offline  
Old 07-18-2010, 08:00 PM
  #39  
Am I Wrong??????????
 
Flyboy8784's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: ThE jEtTtTtTtT
Posts: 662
Default

Hey EK guys....how are the digs they put you up in??? Are the apartments/condos pretty nice??? Anybody have pictures?
Flyboy8784 is offline  
Old 07-18-2010, 10:08 PM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: A330/A340 Capt
Posts: 43
Default

As far as apartments, they're very nice. Right now you'd be looking at Millenium Tower or Teecom. They both have pros and cons but generally very nice.

As far as villas, I believe they're putting people up in the Cedar side of Silicon, which is very nice.

Sorry I don't have pictures of either.

Hope it helps
767200 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joel payne
Foreign
48
11-19-2009 04:28 PM
crjdxr
Cargo
0
10-09-2009 09:13 AM
Dune
Foreign
35
08-23-2009 12:55 PM
BoredwLife
Foreign
11
04-30-2009 08:31 PM
FR8K9
Cargo
35
10-25-2008 05:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices