Search
Notices

Hiring / training

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2021, 02:15 PM
  #2111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SeaRider's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: El Capitan de Airbii
Posts: 277
Default

Originally Posted by JoeFever1 View Post
AKA not growing like we’re supposed to? Not sure how we could be staffed netting 20 something planes in 22? Lower utilization I guess.

Doesn’t make sense to me either. We have only about 15 more pilots than pre-pandemic. We are having attrition. If we have enough for next summer than apparently all this growth is not occurring.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SeaRider is offline  
Old 11-10-2021, 02:40 PM
  #2112  
Bus Driver ordinarie
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Airbus CA
Posts: 555
Default Transcript

Originally Posted by Notarealpilot View Post
If you listened to the earnings call today we are already fully staffed for our summer schedule with the pilots on property.
that’s not what I heard. The question was -into next year; will you have enough pilots.
answer yes. We’re fat on crews but we’ve been intentionally ahead of the curve. We have enough for Q1 and continue hiring for expected growth. Q1 is not ‘summer.
BB also emphases the long lead time between hiring (and upgrading)) to the line. In effect we must have the number of pilots on property we need several months before we *need* them.
the tone of the call was pretty positive with lots of upside. If you’re gonna worry; find something else to worry about. Frontiers’ growth isn’t it…
Punkah Louvre is offline  
Old 11-10-2021, 04:14 PM
  #2113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 628
Default

Originally Posted by Punkah Louvre View Post
that’s not what I heard. The question was -into next year; will you have enough pilots.
answer yes. We’re fat on crews but we’ve been intentionally ahead of the curve. We have enough for Q1 and continue hiring for expected growth. Q1 is not ‘summer.
BB also emphases the long lead time between hiring (and upgrading)) to the line. In effect we must have the number of pilots on property we need several months before we *need* them.
the tone of the call was pretty positive with lots of upside. If you’re gonna worry; find something else to worry about. Frontiers’ growth isn’t it…
Thanks! Good summary
JoeFever1 is offline  
Old 11-15-2021, 08:30 PM
  #2114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Lineholder
Posts: 1,345
Default

Originally Posted by Punkah Louvre View Post
that’s not what I heard. The question was -into next year; will you have enough pilots.
answer yes. We’re fat on crews but we’ve been intentionally ahead of the curve. We have enough for Q1 and continue hiring for expected growth. Q1 is not ‘summer.
BB also emphases the long lead time between hiring (and upgrading)) to the line. In effect we must have the number of pilots on property we need several months before we *need* them.
the tone of the call was pretty positive with lots of upside. If you’re gonna worry; find something else to worry about. Frontiers’ growth isn’t it…
Eh...

Growth is going to be an issue. It always will be given our contract/rates. Being "ahead" of the hiring curve might be ok for now going into Q2 (and maybe Q3) of next year, but sooner or later, we are going to need pilots that aren't available (or that are for only a short while).

Only a contract re-negotiation will solve the growth issue.
dracir1 is online now  
Old 11-16-2021, 06:21 AM
  #2115  
Bus Driver ordinarie
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Airbus CA
Posts: 555
Default

Originally Posted by SeaRider View Post
Doesn’t make sense to me either. We have only about 15 more pilots than pre-pandemic. We are having attrition. If we have enough for next summer than apparently all this growth is not occurring.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Some numbers to consider: from the Seniority List archive - 'Pre Pandemic" -the oldest I have is Q1 2019. We had 1400 Pilots and about 85 Planes.
Today we have ~110 and near 1700 (November class, SL not yet published)
That's a pretty consistent ratio of approximately 16 crews per tail.
Growth in Pilot numbers closely correlates with growth in aircraft. unsurprisingly; as utilization over the near 3 year period has been consistently high.

Again. F9 growth. Worry less :-)
Punkah Louvre is offline  
Old 11-16-2021, 06:34 AM
  #2116  
Bus Driver ordinarie
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Airbus CA
Posts: 555
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1 View Post
Eh...

Growth is going to be an issue. It always will be given our contract/rates. Being "ahead" of the hiring curve might be ok for now going into Q2 (and maybe Q3) of next year, but sooner or later, we are going to need pilots that aren't available (or that are for only a short while).

Only a contract re-negotiation will solve the growth issue.
I agree, but it's not a Frontier specific problem. a quick look at the FA Airman Registry over the last 5 years shows about 10,000 growth in active ATPs, and a decline in PPLs..
Aviation is becoming more of a career than a pastime. Go figure.
I'd suggest that, relative to other 'Professions' flying is becoming less attractive, but there's still growth.
Does the number cover retirements? Before the Covid buy out of the top of the seniority list, near enough. Enough to keep the lights on in the industry and increase the upward pressure on pay. 5 years ago, regionals had just begun to introduce signing bonuses et al.
Post Covid, the recovery messes up everyone's plans.
I think we're going to see Airline crew rates rise, and hopefully in a meaningful way. There's also likely to be something of an arms race between different carriers.
We won't struggle to attract and retain crews to the extent the operation suffers in the medium term. We may very well get paid more for coming to work, -before the next round of contract talks.
-Just an opinion, obviously..
//PL

Last edited by Punkah Louvre; 11-16-2021 at 06:56 AM.
Punkah Louvre is offline  
Old 11-16-2021, 06:51 AM
  #2117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,394
Default

It's hard to imagine that as a pilot group we won't be in the driver's seat in the next round of negotiations.

The company will be under very strong pressure to be about to hire and retain. Nothing but good news for us
Aero1900 is offline  
Old 11-16-2021, 08:09 AM
  #2118  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2021
Posts: 75
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900 View Post
It's hard to imagine that as a pilot group we won't be in the driver's seat in the next round of negotiations.

The company will be under very strong pressure to be about to hire and retain. Nothing but good news for us
That’s optimistic given our last round of negotiations.
CrayonEater is offline  
Old 11-16-2021, 08:22 AM
  #2119  
Slave
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Position: Hot tub
Posts: 1,346
Default

Originally Posted by CrayonEater View Post
That’s optimistic given our last round of negotiations.

to say the least ^^^^^
ReserveCA is offline  
Old 11-16-2021, 09:17 AM
  #2120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TOGALOCK's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 999
Default

Originally Posted by CrayonEater View Post
That’s optimistic given our last round of negotiations.
Originally Posted by ReserveCA View Post
to say the least ^^^^^
Being frustrated and jaded after our last battle is understandable, but the timing of the company coming to the table with something votable was as predictable and obvious as the sun rising tomorrow. I had always wagered that the company wouldn’t come forward until early 2019. I was pleasantly surprised when it happened slightly sooner. The real growth at F9 didn’t kick into overdrive until 2019. Prior to that, while we were receiving new aircraft, we were also returning and retiring quit a few resulting in limited net growth. We were getting by in the hiring department with what we had. The company had no reason to come forward and play ball any sooner than they did.

This time around is different. Planned growth will be non-stop and, between the 10 white tails and the new order for 91 more 321s, we are now about to grow by over 100 extra planes in nearly the same time frame of the original growth plan. Pilots will be needed and we will be competing against the legacies. Let’s face it… the legacies could pay LESS than Frontier and there would still be many pilots that would choose them over us if given the choice.

We will be at the back of the pattern again for this round of negotiations. Indigo’s hand will be forced to make a move if they want to keep talent coming through the doors. We’re also a publicly traded company now. It’s a bit more difficult for the company to claim financial hardship when we have nearly $1 billion in the back and they just bought 235 new airplanes for F9 alone. I’m not saying that it won’t be without its frustrations or that the union and the company will be sitting around the negotiation table singing kumbaya, but the environment and leverage are very different this time around.
TOGALOCK is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PaulG
Hawaiian
4
10-19-2017 04:24 PM
Lbell911
Regional
34
03-13-2016 04:38 AM
HuggyU2
Part 91 and Low Time
25
03-27-2013 02:24 PM
BTDTB4
Major
29
02-14-2012 12:27 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices