Frontier Hiring.
#2891
If you look at the Mock Bid - it is clear KDEN will absolutely be available to new hires.
I count 91 current FOs leaving Denver whether to upgrade out or just transfer out as FO.
The mock bid only shows a net reduction of 46 FO's for Denver by end of year.
This necessitates a backfill of 45 newhire FO's 91-46=45 (well ok, I see 2 non-newhire's bidding DEN FO, so 43 newhires will come into Denver as backfill between now and end of 2015
Granted it's a Mock bid. But assuming it's even only 50% correct, that still requires newhire back fill into Denver which will continue until every FO that has any inclination to upgrade has already done so out of Denver and the only ones left are the senior mamas. That will be a while.
I strongly believe all bases will be available to newhire FO's within a bid period or two for the foreseeable future. Where you hold CA however is an entirely different story. (as we all know)
I count 91 current FOs leaving Denver whether to upgrade out or just transfer out as FO.
The mock bid only shows a net reduction of 46 FO's for Denver by end of year.
This necessitates a backfill of 45 newhire FO's 91-46=45 (well ok, I see 2 non-newhire's bidding DEN FO, so 43 newhires will come into Denver as backfill between now and end of 2015
Granted it's a Mock bid. But assuming it's even only 50% correct, that still requires newhire back fill into Denver which will continue until every FO that has any inclination to upgrade has already done so out of Denver and the only ones left are the senior mamas. That will be a while.
I strongly believe all bases will be available to newhire FO's within a bid period or two for the foreseeable future. Where you hold CA however is an entirely different story. (as we all know)
^^^^^^^^+1
#2892
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Thanks Aero.
#2893
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,395
I agree.
I think new hires will be able to get any base they want.
The company can 'naturally' shrink the Denver base by offering upgrade spots only in MCO and ORD. This causes FOs to bid to the other bases, and they offer a bunch of MCO captain spots and drain some Denver captains out of DEN that way. The company will have to fill Denver FO vacancies, and new hires will get it.
If the company wasn't hiring full speed ahead, I would be far more pessimistic about people getting DEN, but when the company is hiring as fast as they can, and they want to double the size of the airline in 5 years.... I think new hires will have their pick
I think new hires will be able to get any base they want.
The company can 'naturally' shrink the Denver base by offering upgrade spots only in MCO and ORD. This causes FOs to bid to the other bases, and they offer a bunch of MCO captain spots and drain some Denver captains out of DEN that way. The company will have to fill Denver FO vacancies, and new hires will get it.
If the company wasn't hiring full speed ahead, I would be far more pessimistic about people getting DEN, but when the company is hiring as fast as they can, and they want to double the size of the airline in 5 years.... I think new hires will have their pick
#2894
If you look at the Mock Bid - it is clear KDEN will absolutely be available to new hires.It's only a mock bid and doesn't take into account what speed the company plans to grow other domiciles.
I count 91 current FOs leaving Denver whether to upgrade out or just transfer out as FO, and 2 coming in. Net loss of 89.
The mock bid 'totals page' only shows a net reduction of 46 FO's for Denver by end of year.
This necessitates a backfill of 43 newhire FO's ...89 - 46 = 43 newhires will come into Denver as backfill between now and end of 2015 Anyone who get's assigned DEN out of class will necessarily be at the bottom of the seniority list, and be the first to be displaced if/when that has to happen. I don't think anyone will be assigned DEN; the company will just accelerate the VSAs for other domiciles.
Granted it's a Mock bid. But assuming it's even only 50% correct, that still requires newhire back fill into Denver which will continue until every FO that has any inclination to upgrade has already done so out of Denver and the only ones left are the senior papas & mamas. That will be a while.
Now if you want to make the case for a drastic slashing of Denver to a shadow of it's size, then YES, no-one will ever hold Denver... But, the mock bid isn't indicating that, and furthermore if they did do it, where are they going to put all these crews???? Considering the rate at which we're hiring, this would require making ORD and MCO very big, and / or a 4th base. In the near-term Denver is simply the only 'well' which can hold all these pilots at this time. Again, the mock bid was only to ask the preference of the pilots. It never said, "we're shrinking DEN to XXX number of lines, and XXX pilots, and growing ORD / MCO to XXX by ____date. What do you want to do WHEN you are no longer able to hold DEN?"
In the long run Denver will be senior in both seats, but for now, with only 3 bases and breakneck hiring, I strongly believe all bases will be available to newhire FO's within a bid period or two. Where you hold CA however is an entirely different story. (as we all know) The nice thing is that if a new hire is awarded DEN and displaced (rather than bidding for a VSA) they get moving expenses.
...
I count 91 current FOs leaving Denver whether to upgrade out or just transfer out as FO, and 2 coming in. Net loss of 89.
The mock bid 'totals page' only shows a net reduction of 46 FO's for Denver by end of year.
This necessitates a backfill of 43 newhire FO's ...89 - 46 = 43 newhires will come into Denver as backfill between now and end of 2015 Anyone who get's assigned DEN out of class will necessarily be at the bottom of the seniority list, and be the first to be displaced if/when that has to happen. I don't think anyone will be assigned DEN; the company will just accelerate the VSAs for other domiciles.
Granted it's a Mock bid. But assuming it's even only 50% correct, that still requires newhire back fill into Denver which will continue until every FO that has any inclination to upgrade has already done so out of Denver and the only ones left are the senior papas & mamas. That will be a while.
Now if you want to make the case for a drastic slashing of Denver to a shadow of it's size, then YES, no-one will ever hold Denver... But, the mock bid isn't indicating that, and furthermore if they did do it, where are they going to put all these crews???? Considering the rate at which we're hiring, this would require making ORD and MCO very big, and / or a 4th base. In the near-term Denver is simply the only 'well' which can hold all these pilots at this time. Again, the mock bid was only to ask the preference of the pilots. It never said, "we're shrinking DEN to XXX number of lines, and XXX pilots, and growing ORD / MCO to XXX by ____date. What do you want to do WHEN you are no longer able to hold DEN?"
In the long run Denver will be senior in both seats, but for now, with only 3 bases and breakneck hiring, I strongly believe all bases will be available to newhire FO's within a bid period or two. Where you hold CA however is an entirely different story. (as we all know) The nice thing is that if a new hire is awarded DEN and displaced (rather than bidding for a VSA) they get moving expenses.
...
For those interested - our contract calls for voluntary seniority adjustments ("I want to go to MCO!") followed by voluntary displacements ("I don't want to leave where I am, but if I have to I'll go to XXX"), and finally involuntary displacements (reverse seniority order "Here's where you have to show up for your next trip"). The union's position, and the company's past practice, says anything with the word displacement in it requires the company to cover moving costs, but that may become the latest battle over what the meaning of "is" is.
#2895
On Reserve
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Position: Airbus Driver
Posts: 24
Expect 300 pilots in MCO and 200-ish in ORD by next summer, at least. New deliveries and "operational reliability" in MCO & ORD could easily drive those numbers higher.
#2896
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 189
Another question, how long from day 1 of new hire class does it take to get your company ID and entry into CASS? I am hoping to jumpseat home each Friday after class ends and back to Denver on Sundays. Just curious if I can plan on jumpseating home Friday of that first week. Thanks!
#2897
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: A-320 FO
Posts: 90
Another question, how long from day 1 of new hire class does it take to get your company ID and entry into CASS? I am hoping to jumpseat home each Friday after class ends and back to Denver on Sundays. Just curious if I can plan on jumpseating home Friday of that first week. Thanks!
You need to do (at least) 4 cockpit Jumpseat observations, and you can use them to go home if F9 flies that route. They're not "rides home," but if you happen to pick a flight that flies to your home...
#2899
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,395
Perfect. I can't remember who it is in the training dept, but one of them can list you for the flights. Welcome to Frontier
#2900
I received the following email yesterday:
Good afternoon – You are receiving this email because you have applied for a Pilot position with Frontier Airlines under requisition #15-0006.* It was brought to our attention that some of you might have received an email indicating that you had not been selected for such position.** Please be advised that this email was sent in error due to a software glitch and is in no way indicative of your application status.* Your application is currently under review and if you meet our minimums and standards, we will work diligently to arrange an interview opportunity. Frontier is enjoying tremendous growth and will be reviewing resumes and interviewing regularly for the foreseeable future.*
Please accept our sincere apologies for any confusion that this may have caused – we are aware of the issue.
Please don’t respond to this email-email replies will not be checked.
Frontier Airlines Recruiting Team
*
Good afternoon – You are receiving this email because you have applied for a Pilot position with Frontier Airlines under requisition #15-0006.* It was brought to our attention that some of you might have received an email indicating that you had not been selected for such position.** Please be advised that this email was sent in error due to a software glitch and is in no way indicative of your application status.* Your application is currently under review and if you meet our minimums and standards, we will work diligently to arrange an interview opportunity. Frontier is enjoying tremendous growth and will be reviewing resumes and interviewing regularly for the foreseeable future.*
Please accept our sincere apologies for any confusion that this may have caused – we are aware of the issue.
Please don’t respond to this email-email replies will not be checked.
Frontier Airlines Recruiting Team
*
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4 Fan Trashcan
Mergers and Acquisitions
7
01-28-2009 09:27 AM