Search
Notices
GoJet Regional Airline

Advice regarding GoJet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2009, 09:11 PM
  #401  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,669
Default

Originally Posted by Purpleanga View Post
You are a walking contradiction. Be careful so you don't hut yourself with all the pointless ramblings. And for someone that claims is not involved with GJ in no shape or form you sure are very passionate from the side lines..... What I've done for this profession is that I am supporting a cause to raise the bar by not joining an alter ego airline that was formed for the sole purpose of screwing a set of pilots and the overall regional industry. TSA pilots, unlike some other regional pilot groups, have consistently shown that they actually have a backbone.
LOL... you STILL don't get it, do ya kiddo?

Don't tell me about alter-ego, about GoJet's "sole purpose", and defending the profession... tell THEM:

http://www.nmb.gov/representation/deter2006/33n009.pdf

Those are the guys you have to convince... not me. That's all I'm trying to tell you. I'm also trying to tell other hotheads that if they want to remove GoJet from their jumpseats to man up and do it right - by requesting that GoJet be removed from their reciprocal agreement list, and not resort to chicken shiite tactic of playing childish jumpseat games.

Also, it would appear to me that GoJet's contract doesn't appear to be worse than yours, or industry-dragging. Actually, it appears to be better than yours in several different areas. Here's their contract. Enjoy the reading:

http://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/o...Itemid,85.html

Again, you don't have to convince me - it doesn't concern me or affect me... You on the other hand have an uphill battle, and you might as well fight the fight that you could possibly win. Do you think you can accomplish anything throwing fits around the Internet? Like I told you earlier, you're embarrassing your pilot group with your ramblings... Instead, you might want to actually get involved with your union and volunteer your time towards accomplishing your goals. I guarantee you, you'll learn more than you think, and you'll make real contributions... Being passionate helps, but you'll have to learn to have an open mind. Once you learn that the world is actually gray and not black/white, you'll be amazed at how you'll see the world. Until then... don't give yourself a coronary!
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 03-14-2009, 09:43 PM
  #402  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76 View Post

Also, it would appear to me that GoJet's contract doesn't appear to be worse than yours, or industry-dragging. Actually, it appears to be better than yours in several different areas. Here's their contract. Enjoy the reading:

!
HAHAHAAHA, And you said you did work for ALPA, that's pretty scary. Why do you think TSA has the current contract, which is exactly the same as the "new" GJ contract? 10days off 15 hour days, JA, not rigs, no nothing, oh wait it's block or better which TSA does have. Avereage to below average industry pay... Have you read the memos that our MEC sends us every month that say management has continued to use GJ as a whipsaw in negotiations?? Why do you think GJ exists in the first place? For the hell of it? Oh man you are completely clueless.
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 03-14-2009, 09:56 PM
  #403  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

"Those are the guys you have to convince... not me."

RSA, very well said. I think the gojet haters here are missing the big picture you present. Nothing new about that. Keep up with the common sense facts and maybe a few will see the big picture. Kudos....
de727ups is offline  
Old 03-14-2009, 10:41 PM
  #404  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 483
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76 View Post
Don't tell me about alter-ego, about GoJet's "sole purpose", and defending the profession... tell THEM:

http://www.nmb.gov/representation/deter2006/33n009.pdf

Those are the guys you have to convince... not me. That's all I'm trying to tell you. I'm also trying to tell other hotheads that if they want to remove GoJet from their jumpseats to man up and do it right - by requesting that GoJet be removed from their reciprocal agreement list, and not resort to chicken shiite tactic of playing childish jumpseat games.
You are only partially correct about who we need to convince about GJ. If you're of the belief that pilots who to go GoJetS are enabling management to justify their undercutting and circumventing of the TSA contract, then you'd have to agree that it's wise to educate pilots of that position so they can make an informed decision not to go there. It's also somewhat of a public service for people to put this information out there so that any pilot who goes there knows the reason they may be treated poorly in the future.

On the other hand, I completely agree that it's about time we got airlines to remove GJ from their reciprocol jumpseat agreement list. Once I finish up IOE at my new job, I'm going to try to talk to some of my union reps about how we can get this done. I'd recommend everybody else out there do the same thing. I refuse to ride on a GJ plane anyway. If GJ is the only choice out there, I rent a car and drive to another airport.

Additionally, I think it's interesting that some of the guys who have been around the industry for quite a while come on this board and act as though their opinion is more important than any of the younger pilots' opinions. This from the guys that willingly gave up flying to the regionals and helped the industry along in its downward slide. Now they come on here and some of them defend GoJetS. That just shows that they still haven't learned much of anything in all their time. I suppose that the flipside of that may be that when they've tried to do the right thing, they've just ended up getting screwed...I dunno. I just find it ironic though.
Copperhed51 is offline  
Old 03-14-2009, 10:42 PM
  #405  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TBucket's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,109
Default

Originally Posted by de727ups View Post
"Those are the guys you have to convince... not me."

RSA, very well said. I think the gojet haters here are missing the big picture you present. Nothing new about that. Keep up with the common sense facts and maybe a few will see the big picture. Kudos....

It's hard to see some sort of miraculous "big picture" where gojet is ok when you're watching your friends hit the street while they hire like crazy. It might be easy to dismiss the whole thing when you're not involved, but for us at TSA it's still personal. They're costing us our jobs. Still. It's not ok.
TBucket is offline  
Old 03-14-2009, 11:02 PM
  #406  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptKrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: LeftSeat PA-44
Posts: 528
Default

Originally Posted by TBucket View Post
It's hard to see some sort of miraculous "big picture" where gojet is ok when you're watching your friends hit the street while they hire like crazy. It might be easy to dismiss the whole thing when you're not involved, but for us at TSA it's still personal. They're costing us our jobs. Still. It's not ok.
You say that like TSA is the only one furloughing.
CaptKrunch is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 06:00 AM
  #407  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,669
Default

Originally Posted by Purpleanga View Post
HAHAHAAHA, And you said you did work for ALPA, that's pretty scary. Why do you think TSA has the current contract, which is exactly the same as the "new" GJ contract? 10days off 15 hour days, JA, not rigs, no nothing, oh wait it's block or better which TSA does have. Avereage to below average industry pay... Have you read the memos that our MEC sends us every month that say management has continued to use GJ as a whipsaw in negotiations?? Why do you think GJ exists in the first place? For the hell of it? Oh man you are completely clueless.
Yep, 2 ALPA carriers, and our working agreements smoked both TSA and GoJet's by miles.

My... again, you STILL don't get it. Trans States has NEVER led the industry in anything. However, they've been the industry laggards long before GoJet was ever an idea. One saving grace, and the reason why my friends there ended up at Trans States was because of then West Coast basing that's now long gone.

I'll tell you kiddo, why GoJet exists. It exists to have gotten around the APA scope limiting 70 seaters to Eagle, in order to be able to secure UAL Express 70 seat flying. It had to have become a separate certificate, and it was the pilots that chose to ignore ALPA's advice to secure the flying under one seniority list and then seek improvements down the road. Right or wrong, Trans States pilots made their decision and they have to live with it - cost of democracy. Yes, the choices were bad or worse. Sadly, you chose worse. Lesson learned - if you fail to follow a paid legal advice and instead follow your hothead emotions, you have a much higher chance of getting burned. That's the case in any legal proceeding - criminal, civil, labor, etc. Trans States pilots chose the emotional path. Sad to say, that's what happened here, and you're living the consequences of it.

Some good came out of it though, it caused my old airline as well as some others to improve scope language as a result of Mesa/Freedom and Trans States/GoJet fiascos.

Now, anga, I told you my story. Why don't you tell us yours? Dare I take a guess? Early 20's... graduate of some university flying program with bridge to have gotten hired by Trans States with low time? Or perhaps ALL ATPS with RJ transition course? Why do you refuse to share your background with us? It helps to understand where you're coming from since clearly you don't have any other knowledge of the industry outside of these two bottom-dweller outfits. So, please enlighten us.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 10:39 AM
  #408  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76 View Post
Yep, 2 ALPA carriers, and our working agreements smoked both TSA and GoJet's by miles.

My... again, you STILL don't get it. Trans States has NEVER led the industry in anything. However, they've been the industry laggards long before GoJet was ever an idea. One saving grace, and the reason why my friends there ended up at Trans States was because of then West Coast basing that's now long gone.

I'll tell you kiddo, why GoJet exists. It exists to have gotten around the APA scope limiting 70 seaters to Eagle, in order to be able to secure UAL Express 70 seat flying. It had to have become a separate certificate, and it was the pilots that chose to ignore ALPA's advice to secure the flying under one seniority list and then seek improvements down the road. Right or wrong, Trans States pilots made their decision and they have to live with it - cost of democracy. Yes, the choices were bad or worse. Sadly, you chose worse. Lesson learned - if you fail to follow a paid legal advice and instead follow your hothead emotions, you have a much higher chance of getting burned. That's the case in any legal proceeding - criminal, civil, labor, etc. Trans States pilots chose the emotional path. Sad to say, that's what happened here, and you're living the consequences of it.

Some good came out of it though, it caused my old airline as well as some others to improve scope language as a result of Mesa/Freedom and Trans States/GoJet fiascos.

Now, anga, I told you my story. Why don't you tell us yours? Dare I take a guess? Early 20's... graduate of some university flying program with bridge to have gotten hired by Trans States with low time? Or perhaps ALL ATPS with RJ transition course? Why do you refuse to share your background with us? It helps to understand where you're coming from since clearly you don't have any other knowledge of the industry outside of these two bottom-dweller outfits. So, please enlighten us.
Let it go.... you have nothing, other than rationalization all of the above are classic lies. Bottom line GJ is an alter-ego formed to circumvent a union CBA. Doesn't really matter how it was started. TSA did nothing but vote down an unacceptable offer that would have been voted down by any other pilot group. Who would have known that Hulas would actually hire street replacement workers? And did he HAVE to? NO! GJ was meant to be an alter ego from the begging, a whipsaw. Everyone saw that. Do you actually think TSA guys wanted to "give" flying away?? The AA scope is fine but it's how the place was staffed and the fact that it became a separate alter ego is the problem. GJ has been used as a whipsaw since day one. You are some corporate guy and I think you said overseas. Stay out there, stop being a pest and ranting on these boards, your opinions mean nothing since you're not in it. We are trying to solve this and we need unity. And I can tell you that TSA pilots are united and it looks as if the GJ guys are offering support at least now that there's a strike center in STL.
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 10:45 AM
  #409  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKrunch View Post
You say that like TSA is the only one furloughing.
The TSA/GoJet situation is different in the fact that HK is slowly transferring flying from the TSA pilot group over to the GoJet pilot group. It's much different then other carriers that are furloughing right now. When one pilot group has to watch their fellow pilots hit the street while another pilot group (who is owned and operated by the SAME COMPANY!) is hiring and taking new airplanes, it's VERY different.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 12:17 PM
  #410  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 80
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
The TSA/GoJet situation is different in the fact that HK is slowly transferring flying from the TSA pilot group over to the GoJet pilot group. It's much different then other carriers that are furloughing right now. When one pilot group has to watch their fellow pilots hit the street while another pilot group (who is owned and operated by the SAME COMPANY!) is hiring and taking new airplanes, it's VERY different.
So I guess its ok for Mesaba to take Comair flying. Mesaba was hiring to staff the aircraft they were getting from Comair causing Comair to furlough. Where is the outcry against Mesaba?
Mach93 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
d22block
Flight Schools and Training
16
12-22-2008 06:15 AM
TPROP4ever
GoJet
322
11-24-2008 08:45 AM
captscott26
GoJet
244
08-31-2008 03:06 PM
robthree
GoJet
101
08-12-2008 10:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices