Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Changing the Beard Rule >

Changing the Beard Rule

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Changing the Beard Rule

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2017 | 08:32 AM
  #121  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Originally Posted by Wags808
You're correct that I thought the simple part was unanimous agreement among pilots that it is a dumb rule and the idea that beards are unprofessional is false.

Regardless of the union/negotiation talk, the idea that someone would come out and oppose allowing beards/support the current rule is mind-boggling.
Why mind boggling, the majority right here think the rule just fine. Grow up, snowflake!

GF
Reply
Old 04-05-2017 | 09:55 AM
  #122  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
Why mind boggling, the majority right here think the rule just fine. Grow up, snowflake!

GF
Snowflake! Nice.

What's the Galaxy portion of your name? Did you fly C-5s?
Reply
Old 04-05-2017 | 10:38 AM
  #123  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Default

The problem is, if you don't wan't people looking like "hobos," you'll have to establish some sort of standard to determine what beards are acceptable and which are not.

Simply stating "neatly trimmed" wont work very well, because one person's "neatly trimmed" is another's "hobo." It's a lot easier, from a policy perspective, to just say no to any facial hair or, in some cases, allow for mustaches.

There are just to many variables involved and there are more pressing matters for the powers that be to address.
Reply
Old 04-05-2017 | 11:58 AM
  #124  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

17 years, two wars, innumerable "contingencies" (Somalia was a contingency"), and 5000+ hours.

GF
Reply
Old 04-06-2017 | 08:46 AM
  #125  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingStormie
The problem is, if you don't wan't people looking like "hobos," you'll have to establish some sort of standard to determine what beards are acceptable and which are not.

Simply stating "neatly trimmed" wont work very well, because one person's "neatly trimmed" is another's "hobo." It's a lot easier, from a policy perspective, to just say no to any facial hair or, in some cases, allow for mustaches.

There are just to many variables involved and there are more pressing matters for the powers that be to address.
I fully understand what you mean, but I don't think it would be too hard. Saying there is a half- or one-inch limit would work well, seems pretty straightforward, and holds up a standard.

Perhaps over time the younger generation will be more accommodating, since they see professionals of all sorts with beards these days. I don't want to bring in the personal factor, but I'm training to be a pilot (I'm now in my thirties,) and I've have a very short, trimmed beard my entire adult life. Basically, I buzz my entire head at the #1 setting. I've held a professional position that entire time and have never been questioned about my appearance. It is a sacrifice I am more than willing to make, but I still find it random and unnecessary.

And the mustache thing is kind of funny, too, because I don't know how one could possibly argue they look more professional or respectable compared to a trimmed beard.

(On a different note I would argue being overweight could also go against the "professional standard," as well, but that's a whole different can of worms.)
Reply
Old 04-06-2017 | 08:47 AM
  #126  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
17 years, two wars, innumerable "contingencies" (Somalia was a contingency"), and 5000+ hours.

GF
Well, you saw my last name. I'm sure you know my father.
Reply
Old 04-06-2017 | 10:40 AM
  #127  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Westover? Delta?

GF
Reply
Old 04-06-2017 | 02:01 PM
  #128  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wags808
I fully understand what you mean, but I don't think it would be too hard. Saying there is a half- or one-inch limit would work well, seems pretty straightforward, and holds up a standard.
Sure, you could put that language into a grooming policy. The issue lies in enforcement. You'll still get a lot of variation and people won't take too kindly to having their boss take out a ruler to measure hair length to verify compliance, especially in a civilian environment.

The moustache thing isn't about which one is more or less professional looking, it's mainly about which is easier to enforce from a standards point of view. The military and many law enforcement agencies do this by simply stating it won't cover the mouth nor extend past the corners of the mouth.

Personally, I prefer the way I look with facial hair (Van Dyke style specifically). However, if I work for a company that has grooming standards, I'm not going to really think twice about shaving.
Reply
Old 04-06-2017 | 03:42 PM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Default

We are not created equal. Some folk's beard growth looks like the "Mange."
Reply
Old 04-20-2018 | 06:23 PM
  #130  
Fr8Thrust's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Default

Eventually we will win this battle. Just like we won KCM. The rest of the world seems to get it. A nearly groomed beard is considered professional in 2018. Once this generation of pilots makes it into the higher ranks of mgmt, it will happen!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Les Habitants
Regional
28
09-22-2011 07:07 AM
Brown
Major
115
12-27-2007 07:47 AM
rajsingh0621
Major
7
07-08-2005 02:30 PM
Freight Dog
Major
4
05-05-2005 02:42 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices