Short version, the sun gets really hot just before it dies, the Earth turns into a cinder and then freezes permanently. Hopefully, we will have moved by then.

Just a hint, but if it takes a guy in a clown suit five hours to "explain" what you want us to believe, then you may be limiting your audience.
If it is all the same to you, I would much rather read something that contains actual results, proofs and data-not just pure speculation.

Most of us are very open to reasonable evidence presented by people not intending to defraud the public.

 

So you mock me when I don't respond and then disparage my integrity when
I do.

That pretty much sums up your rebuttal strategy, doesn't it?

 

We asked for a response on the geologic/climate record prior to man's existence and how it managed to be both warmer and cooler without people driving SUVs and practicing capitalism, what we got was five hours of a guy dressed like a clown who did not speak to this point.

It should be fairly simple, just explain as far back as the last two ice ages on Earth, describe the mechanism involved with those two massive climate changes.

For extra credit: Has the Earth been both much cooler and much warmer during that period of time?

What exactly is the proper temperature for Earth? What method do you use to determine that temperature? How would you alter that temperature if it was incorrect?

 

One was caused by Fred Flintstone and the other was caused by the Atlantians gezz everybody knows that.

 

at least he didn't call you a sociopath.

WW

 

Most people on his side love to dish it out, but don't you dare try to say anything negative to them or their argument. Double standard at it's finest.

 

Even people that don't stay at a Holiday Inn Express are aware that Earth cools and warms in cycles. There is no point in arguing about that.

The debate is over how much, if any, man is contributing to the current level and rate of warming. Many of you geniuses seem to agree with the minute percentage of qualified scientists that believe humans are not a significant factor in global warming...Rather than the overwhelming majority of scientists, that believe "human induced green house warming" is now occurring.

Now, unlike you APC climatology experts...I'm not completely sure. But, I'm inclined to go with the majority of people that are qualified to have an opinion that anyone should really care about. And, that group of people certainly doesn't include any of you.

Just sayin'.

 

THIS is what it's really about.

United Nations climate envoys have proposed the creation of a global "climate court" that would be responsible for enforcing a sprawling set of rules requiring developed countries to cut emissions while compensating poorer countries in order to pay off a "historical climate debt."

In one section, the document calls for developed countries to help poorer countries with "finance, technology and capacity building" so they can "adapt to and mitigate climate change" while helping eliminate poverty. Another section provides that developing countries should receive an amount of money equal to the amount "developed countries spend on defense, security and warfare."



Thats ALL you need to know.

U.N. Floats Global 'Climate Court' To Enforce Emissions Rules | Fox News

Durban: what the media are not telling you | Watts Up With That?


It's all about the Benjamin's. WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION( with billions also pocketed by the usual crowd).

 

If his explanation about carbon sequestration, the Vostok graph and the Keeling curve in the link I provided is over your head, maybe you should rethink your contempt for his delivery.

 

Sounds more like deception by omission .
"The main vice of capitalism is the uneven distribution of prosperity. The main vice of socialism is the even distribution of misery".


Ally