Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Tool of the day

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2015 | 03:47 PM
  #6351  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,164
Likes: 803
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by F15Cricket
Yes, PLEASE show my post to the SpecOps guys you know--and pass along the thanks for their service that my pax wanted them to have!

After they embarressedly say "You're welcome" or "It is my privilege to serve" (my two normal responses), then please let them know you are too embarrassed to even mention to your pax that you served ...

I never said I needed public thanks ... You must have failed English comprehension at VMI.
You're wrong on this one...there's no need to discuss military history, flying history, or really much of anything else about the pilots' backgrounds.

Some folks might think it's neat, but some will be annoyed or worse. You need to tailor your customer service to the lowest common denominator. Some of the paying passengers are probably opposed to all things military and don't feel they need to be given an opportunity to thank anyone. You're in the service industry now, not the place to be forward leaning with your personal views.

If you want to entertain military and aviation buffs, invite them to the bar afterwards.

And on behalf of the specops community... save the public accolades for the 20 y/o conventional forces groundpounder who has the real crap job and limited resources and support, or the wounded warrior. Hollywood will more than take care of the top guns and sof operators.
Reply
Old 05-24-2015 | 03:50 PM
  #6352  
Fegelein's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
You don't hear a civilian saying his FO has flown 8 leg days in dog*&&# weather with no AP, no bathroom, at a regional partner airline going into JFK, ATL, and ORD, which is a lot more relevant to Part 121 major airline flying than someone who flew single-pilot F16 sorties in the military.

The difference is the public still respects military pilots. Not airline pilots.
Especially commuter/regional pilots who think they are real (mainline) airline pilots.
Reply
Old 05-24-2015 | 04:18 PM
  #6353  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

It cracks me up when I'm standing up at the entrance to the cockpit after a flight and a pax comes happily ambling down the isle "SO YOU MUST HAVE BEEN (insert navy or air force typically)!"

"No sir, I'm an all civilian background, thanks for flying with us today."

"oh..." (dejected look from passenger)
Reply
Old 05-24-2015 | 04:37 PM
  #6354  
Skyone's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
From: B777 Left
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
It cracks me up when I'm standing up at the entrance to the cockpit after a flight and a pax comes happily ambling down the isle "SO YOU MUST HAVE BEEN (insert navy or air force typically)!"

"No sir, I'm an all civilian background, thanks for flying with us today."

"oh..." (dejected look from passenger)
Just tell 'em you were Coast Guard...that will really confuse 'em.
Reply
Old 05-24-2015 | 04:53 PM
  #6355  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Default

Originally Posted by Skyone
Just tell 'em you were Coast Guard...that will really confuse 'em.
Then they will say; "Coaast Guaard? So..... you weren't in the military... Rigging for incoming.
Reply
Old 05-25-2015 | 09:31 AM
  #6356  
F15Cricket's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat 737, Front seat T-6
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
You're wrong on this one...there's no need to discuss military history, flying history, or really much of anything else about the pilots' backgrounds.

Some folks might think it's neat, but some will be annoyed or worse. You need to tailor your customer service to the lowest common denominator. Some of the paying passengers are probably opposed to all things military and don't feel they need to be given an opportunity to thank anyone. You're in the service industry now, not the place to be forward leaning with your personal views.

If you want to entertain military and aviation buffs, invite them to the bar afterwards.

And on behalf of the specops community... save the public accolades for the 20 y/o conventional forces groundpounder who has the real crap job and limited resources and support, or the wounded warrior. Hollywood will more than take care of the top guns and sof operators.
That is your opinion. Based on my pax's overwhelmingly supportive comments, I would say you are wrong.

And merely stating in a PA that someone is a retired Navy or USAF fighter pilot, or Army pilot (or EVEN Coast Guard) is not overboard, arrogant, or toolish.

I flew with another great guy who did not mention his USAF fighter pilot background but merely wears a USAFA lanyard (for Justdoingmyjob, that is a military academy ). He said he received more comments about that lanyard (all positive) than he could have imagined, from people saying thanks for serving or others who have children at USAFA.

Yup, I am in a service industry now, but I was before, too! It must be sad to fly with a company, pilots, and pax who don't want to show a humble pride in their past service to the country. At least at my company, they are VERY patriotic, and so are our pax!

Instead of continuing to bicker about this, let's just remember those who have given their lives in service to the country today. Not doing that is toolish beyond measure!
Reply
Old 05-25-2015 | 09:55 AM
  #6357  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
You're wrong on this one...there's no need to discuss military history, flying history, or really much of anything else about the pilots' backgrounds.

Some folks might think it's neat, but some will be annoyed or worse. You need to tailor your customer service to the lowest common denominator. Some of the paying passengers are probably opposed to all things military and don't feel they need to be given an opportunity to thank anyone. You're in the service industry now, not the place to be forward leaning with your personal views.

If you want to entertain military and aviation buffs, invite them to the bar afterwards.

And on behalf of the specops community... save the public accolades for the 20 y/o conventional forces groundpounder who has the real crap job and limited resources and support, or the wounded warrior. Hollywood will more than take care of the top guns and sof operators.
I like to call these people....liberal socialist a-holes. Who cares what they think?
Reply
Old 05-25-2015 | 02:20 PM
  #6358  
cardiomd's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
From: Seat: Vegan friendly faux leather
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Cirrus's official FAA-approved spin recovery procedure is to deploy the ballistic chute. Sorry, but that's just shady.
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
I'd agree. Especially in the sense that it's probably not the first plane you should learn on.
Yes. Somehow they convinced FAA that deployment of chute is a "spin recovery process."

According to the SR-22 Pilot's Operating Handbook:

"The SR22 is not approved for spins, and has not been tested or certified for spin recovery characteristics. The only approved and demonstrated method of spin recovery is activation of the Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (See CAPS Deployment, this section). Because of this, if the aircraft 'departs controlled flight,' the CAPS must be deployed.
...
Do not waste time and altitude trying to recover from a spiral/ spin before activating CAPS."

Not exactly a pilot's plane. It is viewed as a form of luxury transport for the well-heeled, as was the Bonanza in the 1960's. Fatal accident rate significantly higher than average. I'm not saying it can't be safely flown in the right fashion, but it should be flown in such a fashion - minimizing maneuvering and risk, and I wouldn't want to fly one slowly.
Reply
Old 05-25-2015 | 02:25 PM
  #6359  
cardiomd's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
From: Seat: Vegan friendly faux leather
Default

Originally Posted by Learflyer
I like to call these people....liberal socialist a-holes. Who cares what they think?
Good boy. You are a chickenhawk senator's dream.

My original CFI was ex-mil and (thankfully) he was nothing like the "I wanna trophy I'm special listen to my stories" views expressed above. The smartest officers I've met were humble reasonable people and didn't wear their service on their sleeve.
Reply
Old 05-25-2015 | 02:26 PM
  #6360  
USMCFDX's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cardiomd
Yes. Somehow they convinced FAA that deployment of chute is a "spin recovery process."

According to the SR-22 Pilot's Operating Handbook:

"The SR22 is not approved for spins, and has not been tested or certified for spin recovery characteristics. The only approved and demonstrated method of spin recovery is activation of the Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (See CAPS Deployment, this section). Because of this, if the aircraft 'departs controlled flight,' the CAPS must be deployed.
...
Do not waste time and altitude trying to recover from a spiral/ spin before activating CAPS."

Not exactly a pilot's plane. It is viewed as a form of luxury transport for the well-heeled, as was the Bonanza in the 1960's. Fatal accident rate significantly higher than average. I'm not saying it can't be safely flown in the right fashion, but it should be flown in such a fashion - minimizing maneuvering and risk, and I wouldn't want to fly one slowly.
We get it doc you hate the Cirrus. Again show us your data that it has a significantly higher fatality rate. I already showed you and provided you a link that your statement is false.

If you keep making the same statement over and over it does not make it any more true.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Elvis90
Military
2
11-11-2010 09:25 AM
meloveboeing
Regional
5
10-02-2010 07:47 AM
kc135driver
United
122
08-24-2010 08:30 AM
exerauflyboy5
Flight Schools and Training
15
02-18-2009 08:29 PM
Busdriver
JetBlue
70
01-16-2006 10:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices