Search
Notices

System bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-2019, 06:00 AM
  #101  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Default

Originally Posted by hilltopflyer View Post
I’m completely ok with having a subset group just for the fact that they will have to hire and upgrade more because of it. It’s almost a new type of plane in a way.
True. It's not entirely great for existing BOS/JFK A320 pilots because they will have to decide between flying ONLY London (no thanks) or NEVER London. But yes, that will create significant staffing inefficiency resulting in the need to over-hire.

I could maybe see a single combined INTL bid category for the LR flying that covered the flying of both bases (obviously the group would either be based in Boston or JFK). Two small sub-groups would be even more inefficient. Having to train a subset of pilots and staff a foolproof (Jb-proof) group of reserves for only 6 aircraft (per base) would be ridiculous!
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 06-08-2019, 06:01 AM
  #102  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
True. It's not entirely great for existing BOS/JFK A320 pilots because they will have to decide between flying ONLY London (no thanks) or NEVER London. But yes, that will create significant staffing inefficiency resulting in the need to over-hire.

I could maybe see a single combined INTL bid category for the LR flying that covered the flying of both bases (obviously the group would either be based in Boston or JFK). Two small sub-groups would be even more inefficient. Having to train a subset of pilots and staff a foolproof (Jb-proof) group of reserves for only 6 aircraft (per base) would be ridiculous!
Hence why I would love it if jb decides that would be best. Almost have to hire a brand new set of pilots just for those planes on top of normal hiring
hilltopflyer is offline  
Old 06-08-2019, 06:14 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CA
Posts: 1,211
Default

Originally Posted by nuball5 View Post
Plus I’m assuming this subset group will mostly be senior folk who want to tell their friends and family that they fly over the pond. So it should help the seniority of people who are junior in the other normal domiciles.
Yeah because that’s why people bid, not for the money, the timing of the trips, enjoying layovers... it’s to tell their friends they fly over the pond.
Softpayman is offline  
Old 06-08-2019, 06:22 AM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,236
Default

Originally Posted by Softpayman View Post
Yeah because that’s why people bid, not for the money, the timing of the trips, enjoying layovers... it’s to tell their friends they fly over the pond.
You’ve been in the industry long enough to know there’s an element of truth to his statement.
rvr1800 is offline  
Old 06-08-2019, 06:27 AM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,001
Default

Originally Posted by Softpayman View Post
Yeah because that’s why people bid, not for the money, the timing of the trips, enjoying layovers... it’s to tell their friends they fly over the pond.
Jeez....not much of a sense of humor around here anymore. I’m half kidding, but I’m sure there will be a few that do it for that very reason. They’ll do it for the money? Enlighten me with our current CBA, how much extra money a London 3-day will pay?
nuball5 is offline  
Old 06-08-2019, 07:37 AM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by capt707 View Post
The Europe flying will be a separate group (JFK/BOS), the FAA won’t sign off on anything else. That’s what the big wigs were saying last month in recurrent. They also mentioned about *possibly expanding the “below red line” flying into MCO.
That’s complete BS. Most other airlines have a fleet that does mixed flying(Intl and Domestic), somehow the FAA is ok with everybody else doing it. Yet JB management says the FAA won’t let them, because we’re special apparently. If the european flying is fenced off to where you can only fly to Europe and nowhere else, they are going to have a revolving door of training events. Nobody wants to do that $hitty flying more than once or twice a month, if that.
Xtreme87 is offline  
Old 06-08-2019, 07:58 AM
  #107  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Default

It’s more of the management thinks it will be a desirable bid so once people go they won’t have to retrain someone instead of every time someone bids into jfk training them. They don’t like the idea of making recurrent an extra couple days just to get a whole base trained instead of a small subset. It’s not the FAA it’s $$$$$!
hilltopflyer is offline  
Old 06-08-2019, 08:16 AM
  #108  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Default

Originally Posted by hilltopflyer View Post
It’s more of the management thinks it will be a desirable bid so once people go they won’t have to retrain someone instead of every time someone bids into jfk training them. They don’t like the idea of making recurrent an extra couple days just to get a whole base trained instead of a small subset. *****************It’s not the FAA it’s $$$$$!***********
$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Exactly.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 06-08-2019, 09:23 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 100
Default

I’m all for a longer seniority list, But I don’t see how with only 13 airplanes it would even be possible to have a subgroup in 2 bases. There wouldn’t be enough pairings to complete a month with ALV’s in the 80’s with ONLY Euro flying... especially if it’s going to be mostly 15-16hr 3 day trips. Unless they plan on building a mix of 4/5 day trips that touch both Europe and US/Caribbean. Then maybe... thoughts?
Your name here is offline  
Old 06-08-2019, 09:28 AM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,512
Default

15 hour 3 days!! Woo! I hope we have a separate category so the huge egos will bid over because they won’t be able to stand some other dude flying to London.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RiddleEagle18 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
66
02-25-2012 07:11 PM
EWRflyr
United
42
07-28-2011 08:28 AM
EWRflyr
United
22
07-25-2011 09:23 AM
Roberto
Cargo
144
06-09-2008 04:31 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
17
08-20-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices