Search
Notices

System bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2019, 02:05 AM
  #81  
Permanent Ready Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Upright and Locked
Posts: 969
Default

Originally Posted by todd1200 View Post
Right now that would trigger EPS, but once all of Section 25 is active, that changes, and this scenario could likely become more common.
This is exactly my concern. Found the clause in the cba I had been looking for... basically says unless flight cancels they can't add more flying that results in EPS.

I have been emergency assigned "EMA" at the end of a reserve pairing in the past and I can imagine that continuing to happen, though.

Last edited by TristarJS30; 06-07-2019 at 02:20 AM.
TristarJS30 is offline  
Old 06-07-2019, 02:09 AM
  #82  
Permanent Ready Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Upright and Locked
Posts: 969
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18 View Post
You haven’t had it happen because they aren’t allowed to do it, pre CBA and post.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nevermind, found it.
TristarJS30 is offline  
Old 06-07-2019, 03:36 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,512
Default

Originally Posted by TristarJS30 View Post
This is exactly my concern. Found the clause in the cba I had been looking for... basically says unless flight cancels they can't add more flying that results in EPS.



I have been emergency assigned "EMA" at the end of a reserve pairing in the past and I can imagine that continuing to happen, though.


Remember only 2 EMA’s a year. Keep track and tell the to GFT.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RiddleEagle18 is offline  
Old 06-07-2019, 03:51 AM
  #84  
Permanent Ready Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Upright and Locked
Posts: 969
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18 View Post
Remember only 2 EMA’s a year. Keep track and tell the to GFT.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I keep a list in my phone and already had my two by the end of January.

I will admit to doing 2 more since then that were really easy and financially beneficial but I think I'm also up to 4 or 5 "no thanks" since hitting my 2.
TristarJS30 is offline  
Old 06-07-2019, 04:04 AM
  #85  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
^^^^this

We haven’t taken an E190 delivery in 6 years but the movement on the list is still rapid
E190 CA seniority is moving like E190 FO seniority used to. Its quick, at least in JFK. At some point all the people that want to move to the 320 will have and the 190 CA will stagnate again, but for now life is good.

Well except for the pay of course.
PasserOGas is offline  
Old 06-07-2019, 04:12 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,512
Default

Originally Posted by TristarJS30 View Post
I keep a list in my phone and already had my two by the end of January.



I will admit to doing 2 more since then that were really easy and financially beneficial but I think I'm also up to 4 or 5 "no thanks" since hitting my 2.


I’m with you. 2 done by March. Mid trip EMA me all day. I’m at work and I don’t care where I go. Just pay me!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RiddleEagle18 is offline  
Old 06-07-2019, 05:41 AM
  #87  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Default

Don’t forget it’s a rolling 12 months now.
hilltopflyer is offline  
Old 06-07-2019, 06:24 AM
  #88  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Default

Originally Posted by jamesholzhauer View Post
The last year (since NY/BOS bus captain has become so senior) has all been post AIP bids with a significant change in the dynamic...namely work rules (ADG making formerly bad 10-11 hour 3 days go away making junior bus trips more palatable) and the 90% pay differential going away. Obviously there’s been a flood of senior NY/BOS 190 guys switching over (along with super senior 5 sandwich FOs finally upgrading) temporarily making the seniority required to get bus captain higher than historical numbers in those 2 bases. There have also been relatively few 320 CA vacancies in these bases over the last year, making it even worse.

If JB is really hiring 450 this year and 500 next year, that’s gotta equal about 400 bus captain vacancies over 2019/2020 (and we haven’t seen much yet for this year), most of which will be in JFK/BOS/FLL. I think the senior 190 churn will finish in the next year or so and the numbers will go back down to a more normalized level. That said, my estimate was 3-5 more years for a guy hired 3 years ago, so 6-8 total, which isn’t that far off your 8-10 year estimate. All depends on how much hiring ends up happening and how much of it goes to BOS...but since JG said BOS will be as big as JFK, I imagine BOS will get a decent amount of that.

If there are 36 A220s and 73 A321NEOs added between now and end of 2023, that is 850 or so CA vacancies that will have to be filled, most of which will be BOS/FLL since JFK is maxed out with slots. Of course that’s assuming all those deliveries happen. And sure some of the 190 CA slots will go away so it isn’t all “new” CA slots, but with the $10 pay differential between the 320 and 220, again I don’t think such a wide gap will remain, in theory lowering the relative 320 CA seniority due to a more equalized seniority distribution compared to what we see today with the 190 shift. At least that’s my prediction.
Only thing I would add is take the 36 A220s out of your maff. Those are replacement aircraft, not growth aircraft.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 06-07-2019, 07:55 AM
  #89  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 442
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
Only thing I would add is take the 36 A220s out of your maff. Those are replacement aircraft, not growth aircraft.
Sorry my post was long so could have been missed in the words, but I addressed that piece (at least my theory on it). I’ll try to re-explain. With such a small pay difference between the 220 and 320, the seniority gap will come down, thereby bringing the 320 lower (on a relative scale) compared to the current 190/320 pay/seniority disparity, which has raised the seniority required to hold bus ever since the AIP. So, correct, replacement upgrades, but the seniority distribution will be a lot more equal between the 320/220. More senior guys (across the spectrum) will go to the 220 than go to the 190 (on a relative basis), the effect of which will be lower 320 plug seniority (again on a relative and percentage basis) and higher 220 plug seniority (than 190 plug). Put another way, lots of people won’t do 190 CA (who then take up bus CA slots), but who will do 220 CA. Not sure if I adequately explained the theory, or how accurate it will be. Guess we will see in August 2022 if a current 3 year guy can hold BOS bus CA to determine the theory’s validity (assuming current delivery schedule holds).
jamesholzhauer is offline  
Old 06-07-2019, 10:41 AM
  #90  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Default

Originally Posted by jamesholzhauer View Post
Sorry my post was long so could have been missed in the words, but I addressed that piece (at least my theory on it). I’ll try to re-explain. With such a small pay difference between the 220 and 320, the seniority gap will come down, thereby bringing the 320 lower (on a relative scale) compared to the current 190/320 pay/seniority disparity, which has raised the seniority required to hold bus ever since the AIP. So, correct, replacement upgrades, but the seniority distribution will be a lot more equal between the 320/220. More senior guys (across the spectrum) will go to the 220 than go to the 190 (on a relative basis), the effect of which will be lower 320 plug seniority (again on a relative and percentage basis) and higher 220 plug seniority (than 190 plug). Put another way, lots of people won’t do 190 CA (who then take up bus CA slots), but who will do 220 CA. Not sure if I adequately explained the theory, or how accurate it will be. Guess we will see in August 2022 if a current 3 year guy can hold BOS bus CA to determine the theory’s validity (assuming current delivery schedule holds).
I was talking about your last paragraph. You said with the 36 A220s and 73 A321s JB would need 850 captains. I'm just saying the A220 deliveries won't require more captains, other than the possibility of red-eye flying and a bit of training float through the transition.
Bluedriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
66
02-25-2012 07:11 PM
EWRflyr
United
42
07-28-2011 08:28 AM
EWRflyr
United
22
07-25-2011 09:23 AM
Roberto
Cargo
144
06-09-2008 04:31 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
17
08-20-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices