Search

Notices

TA Reached

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2022 | 10:35 AM
  #271  
Some Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 329
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Bozo the pilot
Yea you do sound like a 1 year guy--Post after a few more years of the lies and we'll see how you feel then.
thanks for the “constructive” response. I said I was keeping an open mind and was looking for besides the profit sharing aspect why people thought this was junk.

but hey I’ll refrain from asking questions and make an uninformed vote then… at least until I get a “few more years” before I can post. Get over yourself pal.
Reply
Old 12-16-2022 | 10:45 AM
  #272  
New Hire
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by seekingblue
I see it differently.

I do agree that PS is mandatory for a JBCA. As for point 3)….. never assume anything. It leads to some great failures.


I actually agree that profit sharing is a good thing…. But I’m not going to squander a 21.5% raise to fight for something that won’t matter until 2024-2026 at the earliest.

honest question- would you take a lower pay rate to get PS? I mean, maybe you believe in our management team more than I do. But for me, I’d take the cash now.
Originally Posted by RJDriver900
thanks for the “constructive” response. I said I was keeping an open mind and was looking for besides the profit sharing aspect why people thought this was junk.

but hey I’ll refrain from asking questions and make an uninformed vote then… at least until I get a “few more years” before I can post. Get over yourself pal.
You’ve been given some constructive responses. I hope you’ll really consider them before you cast an uninformed vote. The people who are less than thrilled with this proposal aren’t simply being petty.
Reply
Old 12-16-2022 | 10:49 AM
  #273  
Some Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 329
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Cclpot
You’ve been given some constructive responses. I hope you’ll really consider them before you cast an uninformed vote. The people who are less than thrilled with this proposal aren’t simply being petty.

I have been and I’ve been using them while looking at the other airlines offers. But his response wasn’t. He easily could have not been snarky and not responded but instead decided too.
Reply
Old 12-16-2022 | 10:53 AM
  #274  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RJDriver900
I've only been here at B6 for a little over a year. Obviously seeing all the stuff over on the farm. Why are people here so hell bent on saying no without consideration because profit sharing wasn't in this. From my standpoint, again only being here over a year, I feel this is a respectable offer. It's short term until a JCBA which when it comes time to negotiate that I think we should be asking for profit sharing.

I don't see how people can compare what we do to deltas operation, widebody and a more substantial international operation and sheer size and the profit sharing size checks they get. From my eyes that's comparing apples to oranges if pilots here think we would see profit sharing checks that size. Not to mention it doesn't take much for an airline to not turn a profit (recession, war, pandemic). So why would you not consider a 21.5% compensation increase with snap up (granted its averaged) which is guaranteed compensation to hold us over to a JCBA? Then we get another shot for compensation, QOL etc.

I feel 21.5% over 18 months is pretty fair considering we get another bite with spirit when we grow tremendously. I'm keeping an open mind and honestly would love for people who are saying no to tell me reasons. I just feel a lot of people aren't keeping an open mind about this. (and before people start blasting me because its APC B6 is not a stepping stone for me. I came here with the full intention of staying)
you also have to realize 18 months will grow to 4 years at least until another contract is had. Just sayin
Reply
Old 12-16-2022 | 11:33 AM
  #275  
IAFDOF's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Airline Employee
Default

Originally Posted by I was inverted
I’d much rather hold a sign in the freezing cold and fight for something that isn’t solidly last place.
You do you, boo.
Reply
Old 12-16-2022 | 11:36 AM
  #276  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Well the good news is when it comes to the JCBA apparently we will hold out for PS there. Now not sure what happens if the company says no but we will get it at that point.
Reply
Old 12-16-2022 | 11:45 AM
  #277  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 472
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpayne
Well the good news is when it comes to the JCBA apparently we will hold out for PS there. Now not sure what happens if the company says no but we will get it at that point.
Lol, do you not remember that time during CBA1 where everyone said they would hold out for PS next time but they had to secure scope and a baseline CBA this time? Guess what! It’s next tkme! Leverage has never been higher. Average phase 2 person has less than 1600 hours. Applicants are almost nil. Leverage exists now. There will always be a “next time” excuse.
Reply
Old 12-16-2022 | 12:06 PM
  #278  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 742
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by I was inverted
Lol, do you not remember that time during CBA1 where everyone said they would hold out for PS next time but they had to secure scope
Yep…then the same morons voted to give up scope.
Reply
Old 12-16-2022 | 02:43 PM
  #279  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 476
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by I was inverted
Frontier (and spirit for that matter) are not included in the jetblue peer group. DL/UA/AA/WN/AS are the established and agreed upon peer set with regards to the snap up. So, B6 will be 6 out of 6 in their peer set for compensation at a time where they can’t attract and retain enough pilots. And, by my estimate, 80% of B6 pilots will happily vote to be last in their peer set. They were happy to sell scope for 3%, so I guess it’s not a surprise though.
One of the biggest reason the MEC/NC wanted us to vote yes to LOA17 was because it would separate us from Alaska (i.e. remove them from our peer set). Now, we are voluntarily putting them right back in our peer set and dragging the future snap ups down. Since that profit sharing money doesn’t count for the snap up, they will continue making more money than us with lower rates.
Reply
Old 12-16-2022 | 02:49 PM
  #280  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by I was inverted
Lol, do you not remember that time during CBA1 where everyone said they would hold out for PS next time but they had to secure scope and a baseline CBA this time? Guess what! It’s next tkme! Leverage has never been higher. Average phase 2 person has less than 1600 hours. Applicants are almost nil. Leverage exists now. There will always be a “next time” excuse.

(it was sarcasm)

If we won’t fight for it now why would we fight for it in the future.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shortfall2105
FedEx
5
08-01-2017 06:56 AM
Elvis90
Major
0
01-20-2012 01:56 PM
FlightPhoenix
Cargo
1
01-21-2009 11:00 AM
Sir James
Major
1
08-23-2007 01:59 PM
FlyByWire
Major
10
03-03-2006 06:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices