Search

Notices

TA Reached

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2022 | 08:37 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Default

Alaska 2022/2023
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG-6002.jpg (93.1 KB, 1109 views)
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 08:38 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Default

Alaska 2024
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG-6001.jpg (94.8 KB, 1244 views)
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 08:40 AM
  #53  
New Hire
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

This may have been posted already. It’s just a SWAG at their proposed rates. Stole it from the Delta AIP thread. Might be helpful later.

DOS 12 year CA/FO
350/330/764 $417/$285
757/763/321NEO $349/$238
321/739 $336/$230
319/320/738 $335/$228
223 $323/$220
221 $310/$211
717 $301/$205

DOS +3 12 year CA/FO
350/330/764 $474/$323
757/763/321NEO $396/$271
321/739 $382/$261
319/320/738 $380/$259
223 $367/$250
221 $352/$240
717 $342/$233
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 08:42 AM
  #54  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mikeer50
I don’t think the 321 rates were applied to that list. They look like the 320 rates, I could be wrong. Or, I could be miss-reading the note.
321 override is not when you "fly" a 321, its a percentage based on fleet size.
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 08:45 AM
  #55  
IAFDOF's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Airline Employee
Default

Originally Posted by FuzzyMulberry12
321 override is not when you "fly" a 321, its a percentage based on fleet size.
That’s a dumb system. They couldnt even get just an Airbus rate in their new TA? For all the whining we do here, it’s gonna be like rescuing a box of malnurished puppies when we merge.
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 08:54 AM
  #56  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by IAFDOF
That’s a dumb system. They couldnt even get just an Airbus rate in their new TA? For all the whining we do here, it’s gonna be like rescuing a box of malnurished puppies when we merge.
You might be misunderstanding the way it's calculated and paid. I actually like the concept overall, but would add a "can't go down" clause to it. And it would apply to all paid events, such as vacation, training and sick time. Add that all up and I like it better than two separate pay rates.
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 10:34 AM
  #57  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
Default

Spirit rates are insulting
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 10:52 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BackseatPilot
From an instructor perspective, there had better be a clause paying what we can hold, irrelevant of jetblue or 121 time. We have too many instructors that are on FO rates because they are only allowed to fly two days a month.

Also, given that nothing else is being negotiated to allow for better and more comparable work rules, pay had better be significantly higher than any of the majors.
Lemme get this straight—you want to be paid your 90 hour instructor guarantee, on Captain pay, without having the same FOM or FAR mandated required flight hours as a line pilot? And without having to go fly that seat/accept that level of responsibility on your two flight days each month?

You seem to be forgetting (or unaware) why you’re capped at two days of flying a month. You get to be effectively based in MCO completely out of seniority order, and you get to VDA/RSA/do your two flying days out of MCO as well, also out of seniority order. Meanwhile, a line pilot 4000 numbers senior to you can’t pickup a seat support, or simply bid into an instructor role.

And, once we hold a reserve CA seat in someplace like JFK, we actually have to commute up there and sit reserve to get our CA check. You don’t.

Given the above compromises, I think I’d be careful what I wish for when it comes to disrupting the current system in place. If I recall, you’re able to go to the line/adjunct if you need the hours to upgrade, right?

Last edited by DontCallMeCindy; 12-15-2022 at 11:18 AM.
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 10:53 AM
  #59  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
You might be misunderstanding the way it's calculated and paid. I actually like the concept overall, but would add a "can't go down" clause to it. And it would apply to all paid events, such as vacation, training and sick time. Add that all up and I like it better than two separate pay rates.
I’m definitely misunderstanding. Can someone please explain? Thanks!!
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 11:23 AM
  #60  
stanherman's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Hack pilot
Default

Originally Posted by avi8orco
Yeah, ok….instructors have it bad….

I remember back when I was based in MCO with 8 years in pulling gear for instructors in the left seat with 4 or 5 years getting 90 hrs of left seat pay and they’re b!tching about something.

Basically based on MCO with a “paper bid” of BOS captain, flying senior day trips they get to pick and choose that they wouldn’t have a chance holding even as a line FO, and getting paid captain pay while sitting next to FOs well senior to them who don’t have a prayer in holding any of that

Complain somewhere else
You beat me to it, I was almost in disbelief at the initial post when I read it. Instructing is already the biggest circumvention of seniority I’ve ever seen.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shortfall2105
FedEx
5
08-01-2017 06:56 AM
Elvis90
Major
0
01-20-2012 01:56 PM
FlightPhoenix
Cargo
1
01-21-2009 11:00 AM
Sir James
Major
1
08-23-2007 01:59 PM
FlyByWire
Major
10
03-03-2006 06:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices