jetBlue Hiring
03-11-2022 | 05:57 PM
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 918
Likes: 2
03-11-2022 | 05:58 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,700
Likes: 48
jetBlue Hiring
Well at least the company finally did something and showed some caring. I suggested the same idea on this forum, and was shot down by many saying “we” pilots shouldn’t waste our bargaining efforts on it. Well, the company did something without us bargaining. That should make those folks happy.
Wrong.
The company needs this change not us. That change needs to be negotiated. So again the company just spit on our contract.
Yea, go JB.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
03-11-2022 | 06:46 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: CRJ-200 FO
I get the frustration over LOA 17, and how management previously just ignored the pilots and proceeded with the NEA. But you’re mad that they’re giving new hires MORE than the contractual minimum $2000 a month right now when they desperately need it?
03-11-2022 | 06:58 PM
Covfefe
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
The company can’t just unilaterally make changes to pay. I’m happy the guys are getting what they should. I’m not happy the CBA is being violated to do it, if in fact it is.
03-11-2022 | 07:04 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,700
Likes: 48
jetBlue Hiring
Yes, because it’s a violation of our contract. Why are Pilots terrible at recognizing leverage?
The company needs this change. We should not allow them to bail themselves out by violating our contract. If they want it, they need to come to us and offer us contract improvements in exchange.
I want the new hires to get paid just as much as everyone else, but learn to recognize leverage and apply it.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
03-11-2022 | 07:08 PM
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Well at least the company finally did something and showed some caring. I suggested the same idea on this forum, and was shot down by many saying “we” pilots shouldn’t waste our bargaining efforts on it. Well, the company did something without us bargaining. That should make those folks happy.
I assure you that the company didn’t do it because they care about the new hires. If they’re doing that, it’s because they think it will help their retention problem.
03-11-2022 | 08:02 PM
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 212
Likes: 5
Why waste time negotiating a CBA if the company just uses it as toilet paper. Very happy for the new hires this should have happened months ago. It should have happened the correct way and negotiated with the union. Maybe those same new hires can also see how the company literally violates the CBA time after time.
03-12-2022 | 05:11 AM
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 436
Likes: 14
Has it been confirmed that the company is paying new hires a bonus outside the CBA? If so this is established case law. They can't do it and since its not an interpretation of our CBA we can sue in open court. This was done by one of the regionals a few years ago over new hire bonuses and they won.
03-12-2022 | 05:24 AM
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 518
Likes: 29
I got a class date confirmation when it said in compliance phase. It just switched to “background cleared” but still no Phase 2 complete email. Haven’t put my resignation letter as I haven’t heard a definite answer if I’m through phase 2 or not.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
