Search
Notices

jetBlue Hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2016, 05:54 AM
  #7681  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ted Striker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: B6
Posts: 777
Default

All of the pay raise to the bus? I'm a 190 guy and agree that the bus should be brought up 100% without a doubt.....as well as a bump to the 190, maybe just not as dramatic. You need to stop thinking black and white, like there is $100 of company money to share and the bus gets $100 of it. It needs to be, the bus gets $100 of it, and now find me $40 more for the 190. We are making 500+ million in profit, starting hotel ventures, looking into acquisitions, buying planes with cash, tossing around millions in venture start-ups.

The just because the 190 is industry leading, and shouldn't get a raise argument is just plane stupid (pun intended). So if you work for a company and make industry leading pay, with your argument theres no point in ever negotiating. Why bother? Your industry leading, no need for a raise. That's fantastic we have the industry leading 190 pay but, there's no reason the bar shouldn't pushed higher. FUPM , and then add some more on top. Jetblue asks their pilots to go above and beyond what a lot of other carriers ask, I expect to be appreciated or it will be point A to point B and nothing more.
Ted Striker is offline  
Old 04-09-2016, 06:31 AM
  #7682  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by Ted Striker View Post

The just because the 190 is industry leading, and shouldn't get a raise argument is just plane stupid (pun intended). So if you work for a company and make industry leading pay, with your argument theres no point in ever negotiating. Why bother?
No. My point is there will be certain amount of money and how are we going to divide it?

It needs to go towards Pay, increased manning, better work rules, avg daily/FDP mins, better vacation/sick system, etc....

So while I think we should ALL get a pay raise, my guess is the preponderance of the raise will go to the Bus. Will there be a token raise for the 190. Maybe. But when the new proposed pay scales are unveiled, the significant amount will be allocated to the 320.....that's all I'm saying
BunkerF16 is offline  
Old 04-09-2016, 06:35 AM
  #7683  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
Default

You guys really need to get awa from the fact that the 190 is industry leading. It's not. Period. For the category and class size weight and seats it is under paid.

Work up from there.
CaptCoolHand is offline  
Old 04-09-2016, 06:49 AM
  #7684  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand View Post
You guys really need to get awa from the fact that the 190 is industry leading. It's not. Period. For the category and class size weight and seats it is under paid.

Work up from there.
Then you need to talk to our MEC/NC because this is the a page out of the comparison document they just sent out to all of us..

Attachment 2791

Last edited by BunkerF16; 01-12-2023 at 04:52 AM.
BunkerF16 is offline  
Old 04-09-2016, 07:27 AM
  #7685  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Posts: 2,918
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16 View Post
And you fly the 190. I get it.

I never said I'd be happy to leave the 190 rates where they are. In fact, early on in this discussion I said I hope both planes get a huge raise.

But being realistic, based on DATA and FACTS, the realistic outcome is that the majority, if not all of the raise will be on the Bus.

Listen, that's not a bad thing. We're not a mainline and regional airline, as much as the Bus guys like to tease the 190 guys. Everyone either can, or will have the chance to fly the Bus if they want to.

I can hold the bus as a captain. I just don't want to go to JFK.

All I am asking you is why go into negotiations already saying we are willing to "decouple" the 190. Seems like you are giving up stuff before we start. We can also sell back pto at 1.5% should we give that up as well because others don't do it that way? All of our cbas will be built on this and if you leave one plane behind it will stay that way. I would feel the same if I was flying the bus, you could always go for "industry leading" and come fly the 190
pilotpayne is offline  
Old 04-09-2016, 07:41 AM
  #7686  
What’s it doing now?
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 190CA
Posts: 726
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16 View Post
And you fly the 190. I get it.

I never said I'd be happy to leave the 190 rates where they are. In fact, early on in this discussion I said I hope both planes get a huge raise.

But being realistic, based on DATA and FACTS, the realistic outcome is that the majority, if not all of the raise will be on the Bus.

Listen, that's not a bad thing. We're not a mainline and regional airline, as much as the Bus guys like to tease the 190 guys. Everyone either can, or will have the chance to fly the Bus if they want to.
No you're saying most if not all the money should go to the bus. As people have pointed out, there are pitfalls in doing that. Jb could order a whole bunch more 190s and cancel Airbus orders, it creates large training costs as people move over so there is less money for the company to pay in salary. and if the MEC/jb put out a ta, they want it to pass. Leaving 800 of the pilots behind to give a raise to the bus could threaten that. There's more to it than just saying one is below average for size and the other is above average.
Tom a Hawk is offline  
Old 04-09-2016, 08:00 AM
  #7687  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpayne View Post
I can hold the bus as a captain. I just don't want to go to JFK.

All I am asking you is why go into negotiations already saying we are willing to "decouple" the 190. Seems like you are giving up stuff before we start. We can also sell back pto at 1.5% should we give that up as well because others don't do it that way? All of our cbas will be built on this and if you leave one plane behind it will stay that way. I would feel the same if I was flying the bus, you could always go for "industry leading" and come fly the 190
And that's my point....you can hold the Bus CA but choose not to for QOL reasons and that's great. But to give a lower raise to the bus for the purpose of keeping the 190 coupled to it makes no sense.

I find it interesting our own Union put out a product that shows our 190 at/near the top of the pay scale for its class.....sounds like a little pilot expectation management going on to me.
BunkerF16 is offline  
Old 04-09-2016, 08:03 AM
  #7688  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by Tom a Hawk View Post
No you're saying most if not all the money should go to the bus. As people have pointed out, there are pitfalls in doing that. Jb could order a whole bunch more 190s and cancel Airbus orders, it creates large training costs as people move over so there is less money for the company to pay in salary. and if the MEC/jb put out a ta, they want it to pass. Leaving 800 of the pilots behind to give a raise to the bus could threaten that. There's more to it than just saying one is below average for size and the other is above average.
You don't understand JBs growth model at all. JB is all about ASM and buying 100 seat AC is not consistent with that theme. My guess is we never take the 190s on our order books either and any additional smaller AC purchases will be to replace aging 190, not additive to current fleet....
BunkerF16 is offline  
Old 04-09-2016, 08:13 AM
  #7689  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Posts: 2,918
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16 View Post
You don't understand JBs growth model at all. JB is all about ASM and buying 100 seat AC is not consistent with that theme. My guess is we never take the 190s on our order books either and any additional smaller AC purchases will be to replace aging 190, not additive to current fleet....

We also were not interested in merging until we were. But if you leave one airplane at a large discount to the other things can change.
pilotpayne is offline  
Old 04-09-2016, 08:16 AM
  #7690  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpayne View Post
We also were not interested in merging until we were. But if you leave one airplane at a large discount to the other things can change.
It's not a discount, it's at/near leading pay for its class.....stop comparing it to the Bus
BunkerF16 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freight Dog
Hiring News
26
08-01-2016 01:48 PM
RiddleEagle18
Major
1
04-21-2011 07:13 AM
tone
Hiring News
139
05-16-2010 09:34 PM
tone
Hiring News
22
04-28-2010 05:20 AM
ryane946
Major
6
02-21-2007 04:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices