IATA Calls for Raising Pilot Age Limit to 67
12-22-2025 | 04:41 PM
#1731
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 615
Likes: 148
There is so much wrong with your response that I won't even try to unpack it.
The fact that you assume this is about money for me tells me this is all about money for you. It's ok. But you should at least admit it.
I know you won't, but when you get to 62, try to remember what you have posted and see how well it ages.
The fact that you assume this is about money for me tells me this is all about money for you. It's ok. But you should at least admit it.
I know you won't, but when you get to 62, try to remember what you have posted and see how well it ages.
If you love flying, and are a “true aviator” as the EPAS group has started claiming, you can continue to fly as a hobby.
If you want to continue as a career, there are part 91/135 operators or flying schools who could greatly use your mentorship.
You just want to stay at the top of the pay scale for two more years at the detriment of everyone below you.
You may be surprised how well you feel in your 60’s, but don’t be surprised by the retirement age. It was there long before you ever stepped foot on a plane.
12-22-2025 | 04:56 PM
#1732
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
There is so much wrong with your response that I won't even try to unpack it.
The fact that you assume this is about money for me tells me this is all about money for you. It's ok. But you should at least admit it.
I know you won't, but when you get to 62, try to remember what you have posted and see how well it ages.
The fact that you assume this is about money for me tells me this is all about money for you. It's ok. But you should at least admit it.
I know you won't, but when you get to 62, try to remember what you have posted and see how well it ages.
but sure, tell me what this is about if not money.
12-22-2025 | 06:46 PM
#1733
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 696
Likes: 30
How is it not about money for you?
If you love flying, and are a “true aviator” as the EPAS group has started claiming, you can continue to fly as a hobby.
If you want to continue as a career, there are part 91/135 operators or flying schools who could greatly use your mentorship.
You just want to stay at the top of the pay scale for two more years at the detriment of everyone below you.
You may be surprised how well you feel in your 60’s, but don’t be surprised by the retirement age. It was there long before you ever stepped foot on a plane.
If you love flying, and are a “true aviator” as the EPAS group has started claiming, you can continue to fly as a hobby.
If you want to continue as a career, there are part 91/135 operators or flying schools who could greatly use your mentorship.
You just want to stay at the top of the pay scale for two more years at the detriment of everyone below you.
You may be surprised how well you feel in your 60’s, but don’t be surprised by the retirement age. It was there long before you ever stepped foot on a plane.
Well Said.
12-22-2025 | 08:33 PM
#1734
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 66
Hoosier, the pilots against the change just want to move up like you did. Guys retiring or dying. You and your “mentor” buddies need to step aside gracefully like generations before you have. None of you would be for age 67 or no retirement age if you were junior captains or still FO’s. Somehow they survived ch11 and ch7 and gracefully passed the torch. You are truly a disgrace to the profession!
Last edited by crewdawg; 12-23-2025 at 04:39 AM. Reason: Personal attacks
12-23-2025 | 06:31 AM
#1735
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,107
Likes: 793
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
https://www.wsj.com/health/wellness/...?mod=wknd_pos1
WSJ article (paywall) reporting on research that the brain ages in five phases...
0-9 Youth
9-32 Adolescent
32-66 Stable
66-83 Slight Decline
83+ More Decline
The last two are characterized by less cognitive flexibility, while remaining more functional in frequently used pathways and processes, ie habits and routines.
WSJ article (paywall) reporting on research that the brain ages in five phases...
0-9 Youth
9-32 Adolescent
32-66 Stable
66-83 Slight Decline
83+ More Decline
The last two are characterized by less cognitive flexibility, while remaining more functional in frequently used pathways and processes, ie habits and routines.
12-23-2025 | 08:17 AM
#1736
Bent over by buybacks
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 638
https://www.wsj.com/health/wellness/...?mod=wknd_pos1
WSJ article (paywall) reporting on research that the brain ages in five phases...
0-9 Youth
9-32 Adolescent
32-66 Stable
66-83 Slight Decline
83+ More Decline
The last two are characterized by less cognitive flexibility, while remaining more functional in frequently used pathways and processes, ie habits and routines.
WSJ article (paywall) reporting on research that the brain ages in five phases...
0-9 Youth
9-32 Adolescent
32-66 Stable
66-83 Slight Decline
83+ More Decline
The last two are characterized by less cognitive flexibility, while remaining more functional in frequently used pathways and processes, ie habits and routines.
Just cross out "67" and pencil in "83."
The study has been done! It's a no-brainer!
12-23-2025 | 08:59 AM
#1737
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 615
Likes: 148
I believe he was referencing reflex speed which even at a very old age doesn’t diminish that much.
The point being, people will latch on to whatever study they believe proves their point and disregard all other empirical data.
12-23-2025 | 03:47 PM
#1738
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,107
Likes: 793
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
For clarity, I think the study shows that the current age is pretty close to correct. I think the stable range is the window to shoot for.
If the stable range was 32-70, then that would be a different story. At least as far as the cognitive aspect goes.
If the stable range was 32-70, then that would be a different story. At least as far as the cognitive aspect goes.
12-24-2025 | 03:00 AM
#1739
On Reserve
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 111
Likes: 2
A Scientist Says Humans Will Go Backwards in Time Within Just 4 Years
https://www.popularmechanics.com/sci...wards-in-time/
How do you figure this into the mix. It’s an aspect that’s coming sooner than later. My previous career was in the medical field and friends of mine that still practice are preparing for it and today are witnessing miraculous results with machine learning and gene editing. The industry is going to be forced to move away from “age as a number” and move towards a purely physical assessment evaluation in determining abilities. Age 67 is going to be moot at some point in the near future.
12-24-2025 | 05:50 AM
#1740
Can’t find crew pickup
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 200
A Scientist Says Humans Will Go Backwards in Time Within Just 4 Years
https://www.popularmechanics.com/sci...wards-in-time/
How do you figure this into the mix. It’s an aspect that’s coming sooner than later. My previous career was in the medical field and friends of mine that still practice are preparing for it and today are witnessing miraculous results with machine learning and gene editing. The industry is going to be forced to move away from “age as a number” and move towards a purely physical assessment evaluation in determining abilities. Age 67 is going to be moot at some point in the near future.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
