Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Jetblue pilots stay non-union >

Jetblue pilots stay non-union


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Jetblue pilots stay non-union

Old 01-04-2011 | 05:17 PM
  #161  
Airhoss's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Default

Originally Posted by MILUAL
I come here sporadically so I know this was a couple weeks back, but as a current bus guy that lived through the UAL decade of watching furloughs I want to comment.

You are wrong. Sometimes it is alpa that furloughs. It was alpa and paul whitford, with chuck pierce at his side, that caused over 1000 additional furloughs by negotiating super high hour lines and S&#T work rules to save his unsaveable A-fund. He then signed away big RJs with one pen stroke. Then alpa shoved age 65 up our a$$, against the wide majority of alpa pilots, without the courtasy of a reach around. Adding 5ish years to current furloughs without so much as a thought because that was prater's agenda item. Current furloughs would be largely over were it not for alpa, thus making them alpa furloughs. Yea, was it the company that sent out the furlough notices? Yes. Are a large number the a result of alpa actions. YES! Thus making them all alpa's.

Do I think JB and everyone else should be unionized. HELL YES.....but as much good as alpa has done in the past, they have done more harm this decade. The reason alpa continues to get away with this sh%t is people that don't put the proper blame at their feet. It is management's job to f&$k me over for an extra nickle. It is alpa's job to protect my career. Score the win for management last decade. Hopefully we can pull our alpa head out of our a$$ and make this decade better for the profession.
Pretty hard to argue with any of that. Spot on!
Reply
Old 01-06-2011 | 08:53 PM
  #162  
A320's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Default

And why am I paying ALPA dues at UAL while getting paid less than "non union" wages at well, everywhere else?
Reply
Old 01-06-2011 | 09:57 PM
  #163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by MILUAL
I come here sporadically so I know this was a couple weeks back, but as a current bus guy that lived through the UAL decade of watching furloughs I want to comment.

You are wrong. Sometimes it is alpa that furloughs. It was alpa and paul whitford, with chuck pierce at his side, that caused over 1000 additional furloughs by negotiating super high hour lines and S&#T work rules to save his unsaveable A-fund. He then signed away big RJs with one pen stroke. Then alpa shoved age 65 up our a$$, against the wide majority of alpa pilots, without the courtasy of a reach around. Adding 5ish years to current furloughs without so much as a thought because that was prater's agenda item. Current furloughs would be largely over were it not for alpa, thus making them alpa furloughs. Yea, was it the company that sent out the furlough notices? Yes. Are a large number the result of alpa actions. YES! Thus making them all alpa's.

Do I think JB and everyone else should be unionized. HELL YES.....but as much good as alpa has done in the past, they have done more harm this decade. The reason alpa continues to get away with this sh%t is people that don't put the proper blame at their feet. It is management's job to f&$k me over for an extra nickle. It is alpa's job to protect my career. Score the win for management last decade. Hopefully we can pull our alpa head out of our a$$ and make this decade better for the profession.
Some good facts.

But the facts that you are leaving our are:

1. Your MEC did this. Not ALPA. ALPA national supports the MEC. Your MEC sold these pilots down the river to save thier retirement.

2. Your pilot group voted to accept this contract. Thus your pilots screwed the pilots that where furloughed, not ALPA.

3. Age 65 was done based on a survey of all ALPA pilots. The majority of all ALPA pilots want this. Again, blame the pilots, not ALPA for doing what their members wanted. (personally I think age 65 was wrong, but I had not vote here at JB).

Again, what everyone that is ANTI ALPA talks about is how "they where screwed by ALPA. Again, they were screwed by their airline and their local MEC and pilot group (ref above), not by ALPA. Sometimes democracy sucks, especially when the majoirty screws the minority.

Just my opinion.......

FNG
Reply
Old 01-06-2011 | 10:26 PM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Bus FO for now..but #2 in the Turkmenistan Airlines hiring pool...#1 is a goat
Default

Originally Posted by FNG320
Some good facts.

But the facts that you are leaving our are:

1. Your MEC did this. Not ALPA. ALPA national supports the MEC. Your MEC sold these pilots down the river to save thier retirement.
FNG
You are right, anyone that supported whitford on the mec has a share in the blame. That even includes some that were usually against Whiteford but then supported him and pierce taking negotiations away from the negotiating committee so they could be "expeditious in a fluid environment". What a crock of SH#T!!!

Originally Posted by FNG320
2. Your pilot group voted to accept this contract. Thus your pilots screwed the pilots that where furloughed, not ALPA.
Yes, I blame the yes voters too, and I voted no(unlike the people that say they voted no but voted yes) but the ALPA NATIONAL Lawyers and our mec where telling people that we were out of time and had no options. Too many believed them. whitford had steered the negotiations and caught us in a corner with time against us. Fear won the vote.

Originally Posted by FNG320
3. Age 65 was done based on a survey of all ALPA pilots. The majority of all ALPA pilots want this. Again, blame the pilots, not ALPA for doing what their members wanted. (personally I think age 65 was wrong, but I had not vote here at JB).
Whhooaa.. Let state ALL the facts. ALPA poled us once and the pilots, by a wide majority, were against the change of age 60. Prater did not like that so the put out a directed poll and asked "IF age 60 changed would you rather have alpa participate so we might have a say in how it is implimented?." majority said " Uh, well I guess?? ". prater/alpa "See, the majority want it." They did it on purpose and let's not insult anyone's intelligence on how it went down. That is the FACT!!

Originally Posted by FNG320
Again, what everyone that is ANTI ALPA talks about is how "they where screwed by ALPA. Again, they were screwed by their airline and their local MEC and pilot group (ref above), not by ALPA. Sometimes democracy sucks, especially when the majoirty screws the minority.

Just my opinion.......

FNG
I pay alpa to do a job. Protect my career. Personal agendas and politics combined with incompetency made them an utter failure at that the last decade. Excusing them will only allow them to suck at their job for that much longer. Was that largely due to UAL mec and pilot votes? Yes, I agree 100%. alpa national/prater were the ones that shoved age 65 up our a$$.
Reply
Old 01-07-2011 | 04:32 AM
  #165  
Dirtdiver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: 767A
Default

Originally Posted by FNG320
Some good facts.




3. Age 65 was done based on a survey of all ALPA pilots. The majority of all ALPA pilots want this. Again, blame the pilots, not ALPA for doing what their members wanted. (personally I think age 65 was wrong, but I had not vote here at JB).



FNG


ALPA didn't increase the retirement age to 65, the Feds did. It was going to happen no matter what ALPA, APA, SWAPA or any poll of pilots said.

I agree with you that it was wrong, but even an SOS would not have stopped it.
Reply
Old 01-07-2011 | 04:40 AM
  #166  
pilot772's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: UAL Guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by FNG320
Some good facts.

But the facts that you are leaving our are:



3. Age 65 was done based on a survey of all ALPA pilots. The majority of all ALPA pilots want this. Again, blame the pilots, not ALPA for doing what their members wanted. (personally I think age 65 was wrong, but I had not vote here at JB).




FNG
On this fact you are mistaken. As I recall when the ALPA pilots were polled it came back something like 65% against changing age 60. Like stated above Prater and the leaders at National were not happy about this. Prater formed a "blue ribbon" panel that was skewed to get the results he wanted. If I remember correctly almost all of the panel was over the age of 50. All but 1 was a captain and all but one member came from the major airlines. After it was announced that the panel and ALPA would support age 65 I emailed Prater asking how if a large majority of pilots were against something ALPA still supported it? He replied with what is stated above. Basically it is going to change anyway so we want to be a part of it. Which was a pretty spineless way to do business. And probably a large reason why Prater is no longer in charge.

Going to ALPA is a decision that all the jetBlue pilots will have to make on their own. Just want to correct the facts on this one issue.
Reply
Old 01-07-2011 | 08:36 AM
  #167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Bus FO for now..but #2 in the Turkmenistan Airlines hiring pool...#1 is a goat
Default

Originally Posted by Dirtdiver
ALPA didn't increase the retirement age to 65, the Feds did. It was going to happen no matter what ALPA, APA, SWAPA or any poll of pilots said.

I agree with you that it was wrong, but even an SOS would not have stopped it.

Please do not state what you don't know. If alpa had fought it we don't know what may have happened/changed because we did not try. It really bothers me when people know something would, or would not, have happened when we never tried. It's a cowardly way of saying I did not want to fight.
Reply
Old 01-07-2011 | 08:41 AM
  #168  
B757200ER's Avatar
AAmerican Way for AA Pay
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
From: B-737 Pilot
Question Say Again?

Originally Posted by greedyairlineexec
Sad day for all JB pilots. we all lost.

please AA buy this place a fire us all... enough with dragging everyone down.
Are you joking? Careful what you wish for. It may come true. Rest assured, AA would not treat you or your employees fairly.
Reply
Old 01-07-2011 | 08:48 AM
  #169  
B757200ER's Avatar
AAmerican Way for AA Pay
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
From: B-737 Pilot
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by JetDaily
....and you think you can't be stapled as an ALPA carrier?

Check with the TWA folks who got the royal shaft by "THE" pilot's union, ALPA. And, it was not because they were in BK either. ALPA literally sold them out! jetBlue pilots made the absolute correct decision. Good for you. It appears that you have the ability to think for yourselves. I salute you!
JD
Amazing. I agree 100%. JD---you're absolutely right. See above post, too.
Reply
Old 01-07-2011 | 10:13 AM
  #170  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by A320
And why am I paying ALPA dues at UAL while getting paid less than "non union" wages at well, everywhere else?
Because there were non-Union jetBlue pilots flying A320s for $129 an hour when UAL declared bankruptcy. United abrogated their labor contracts, stole the A plan and imposed "competitive" wages.

And jetBlue, Virgin and Allegiant pilots can't figure out why they get accused of degrading the profession.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Regional
23
01-14-2010 07:19 AM
WaterBoarder
Major
147
02-01-2009 08:58 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
greedyairlineexec
Major
48
12-18-2008 05:03 AM
Redwood
Major
74
09-06-2008 06:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices