Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Why is fapa williing to give up so much? >

Why is fapa williing to give up so much?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Why is fapa williing to give up so much?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2011 | 04:37 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
Faultpush...

In the last week Ive flown with reserves from DCA, PIT, and PHl.. Having the airplanes on the Frontier certificate would not allow for them to understaff as they do. That being said, in at least 3 instances that I've seen...they were so short staffed that they had to use an airbus to cover a flight.

The Dhs are a constant issue with our company. I hear that you guys are now getting more and more of those. This time of year it is horrible to bump paying passengers because everything is full. Part of the problem is that they wait till the night before to make the reservations.

They "had a long day" Did they call in fatigued? I'm sure you realize that our crews dont have as great schedules as you guys do? On average we get 13-14 days off and wierd hours.
Which all goes to my point. I've NEVER seen a Frontier pilot do that. A couple of months back, I had a choice between losing pay by calling in fatigued, or bumping a passenger so I could sleep on the deadhead.
Reply
Old 06-14-2011 | 07:58 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: ERJ-170
Default

Originally Posted by FAULTPUSH
Which all goes to my point. I've NEVER seen a Frontier pilot do that. A couple of months back, I had a choice between losing pay by calling in fatigued, or bumping a passenger so I could sleep on the deadhead.
I think the issue you have is RAH crews refusing to sit in the jumpseat while positive spaced?
I know you guys do it but we are contractually required to have a passenger seat for crew movements. Generally this is the standard for most carriers. We consider the jumpseat a resource for commuting pilots not a company owned deadhead tool. Once we start giving that up we will never get it back.
Reply
Old 06-14-2011 | 10:11 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wiscopilot
I think the issue you have is RAH crews refusing to sit in the jumpseat while positive spaced?
I know you guys do it but we are contractually required to have a passenger seat for crew movements. Generally this is the standard for most carriers. We consider the jumpseat a resource for commuting pilots not a company owned deadhead tool. Once we start giving that up we will never get it back.
That doesn't change the fact that the jumpseats were available, and 3 revenue passengers got left behind, and I have never seen that at Frontier. Thus my point about the operation being better if the E190's were on the Frontier certificate with Frontier crews. At the same time, I fully understand the deadheading crew not being willing to help out, given the treatment that they get on that side of the fence (no pun intended).
Reply
Old 06-14-2011 | 10:49 PM
  #84  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 320
Likes: 1
Default

Faultpush...I read wrong in your wording there. Thanks for clearing it up.

Yes, we at republic see the jumpseat as a resource for commuters. I personally have agreed to sit in the jumpseat to get a revenue on with the condition that if a pilot showed up that I wanted my seat back. When a pilot showed up I was told that they would not change it back. That was the last time I did that. I always make a walk through the gate area to make sure that there are no jumpseaters and if I have a deadheader who has volunteered to help the company out by riding the jumpseat, I always ensure that they aren't leaving a jumpseater at home. To each their own, but this is a small industry and the favor has paid me back time and time again. In addition, I will always volunteer to sit up front to help a nonrev on. We have to take care of each other because Bedfords too worried about his basketball court to worry about us.

By the way, has anyone told you how many times that the words "good faith" has been used with us and how many times they have actually done that? Zero!
Reply
Old 06-15-2011 | 05:25 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Wiscopilot
I think the issue you have is RAH crews refusing to sit in the jumpseat while positive spaced?
I know you guys do it but we are contractually required to have a passenger seat for crew movements. Generally this is the standard for most carriers. We consider the jumpseat a resource for commuting pilots not a company owned deadhead tool. Once we start giving that up we will never get it back.
Totally lame in now bringing in the jumpseat. How about worrying about real things like making more than 37 hr for your FO's. Better work rules etc. And no we do not force ANY of your DHD pilots to jumpseat.
Reply
Old 06-15-2011 | 05:54 AM
  #86  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 320
Likes: 1
Default

Bolo...Our contracts so ****ty we have to highlight the 3 or 4 good things... We admit to this and we also admit it needs to be a lot better. The process of getting this is the same whether you are IBt, Alpa, or FAPA. Our contract was written when we only had 50 seat 145s. It is pitiful but we had to give up a lot to get our scope clause. If not, we would have all been outsourced to the original "republic". If Bedford spent half the time figuring out how to run an airline as he does dreaming of ways to screw us and work groups against each other we would have run off and left southwest.
Reply
Old 06-15-2011 | 05:58 AM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
Faultpush...I read wrong in your wording there. Thanks for clearing it up.
I probably worded my wording poorly.

Originally Posted by Bolo
And no we do not force ANY of your DHD pilots to jumpseat.
I have asked though.
Reply
Old 06-15-2011 | 06:06 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,585
Likes: 328
Default

Originally Posted by FAULTPUSH
That doesn't change the fact that the jumpseats were available, and 3 revenue passengers got left behind, and I have never seen that at Frontier. Thus my point about the operation being better if the E190's were on the Frontier certificate with Frontier crews. At the same time, I fully understand the deadheading crew not being willing to help out, given the treatment that they get on that side of the fence (no pun intended).
I will not take the jumpseat as a deadheader to get revenue on board. I've seen too many agents expect this. If I'm on company time, I am revenue.
Reply
Old 06-15-2011 | 06:15 AM
  #89  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Janitor
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I will not take the jumpseat as a deadheader to get revenue on board. I've seen too many agents expect this. If I'm on company time, I am revenue.
WORD!
agree
Reply
Old 06-15-2011 | 06:21 AM
  #90  
slumav505's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145 CA
Default

Originally Posted by mking84
Republic is that lemon. And i cannot wait to see F9 squeeze all the money out of it, then have UAL and DAL put the contracts up for bid when they renew. Buh bye Republic.
Which is why DAL just gave shuttle more flying......
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SF340guy
Union Talk
92
06-12-2011 06:30 PM
Spanky189
Major
130
10-14-2009 06:23 AM
av8r4aa
Major
19
01-15-2007 08:51 AM
CO777Driver
Major
32
07-22-2006 09:50 PM
dash trash
Regional
1
02-27-2006 07:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices