Mesa Training
#271
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Position: Metal brackets
Posts: 190
You might ask him how his training is going. Typically, schedules get thrown off if more SIM sessions are required than planned.
Something is not right about your story because every single pilot I know got paid during breaks in training. One guy had trouble with cockpit access and they paid him the 6 weeks while the FAA sorted it out. It could also be as simple as an HR screw up.
Something is not right about your story because every single pilot I know got paid during breaks in training. One guy had trouble with cockpit access and they paid him the 6 weeks while the FAA sorted it out. It could also be as simple as an HR screw up.
#273
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 317
frequency
heading
altitude
and how to get out if you screw up.
anything else, is just wasted ink.
#274
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
#275
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,275
That sounds like an advantage actually... If your trying to pick a runway based on minimums, or for flight planning purposes, it would be nice to look at one page instead of searching through every approach plate
#276
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 450
That is the biggest bunch of BS. Why do some of you idiots keep defending these charts??
#277
If it was consistently applied yes but it’s not. It’s a crap shoot if your mins are on the plate itself or not.
#278
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,275
Maybe some of us do not see what the big deal is? The chart simply needs to verify what's in the box, all important info is already written down on the clipboard that "might" need to be referenced. It's not like we are still flying GA, manually intercepting radials and DME fixes...
#279
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Maybe some of us do not see what the big deal is? The chart simply needs to verify what's in the box, all important info is already written down on the clipboard that "might" need to be referenced. It's not like we are still flying GA, manually intercepting radials and DME fixes...
Here are the big points for concern:
1. The rate at which the application burns through battery life. A personal backup battery will become a requirement.
2. The reference to multiple pages for a single approach.
3. The lack of delineation of RNAV v HDG departures without reading the text.
4. The fact that the same bozos who make mistakes in the box (we had a mistake on an IAH arrival recently) now are the ones supplying the charts.
5. We already have a number of deviations. Thus will simply add to that number.
We will just have to wait and see how flying with the charts is. We will get used to the common charts just like everyone knows the mins of the IAH ILS 27 is 290 without even looking at the chart. (Just wait until the GS is out of service).
#280
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 166
Maybe some of us do not see what the big deal is? The chart simply needs to verify what's in the box, all important info is already written down on the clipboard that "might" need to be referenced. It's not like we are still flying GA, manually intercepting radials and DME fixes...
Also, some of the taxi diagrams barely resemble what they are charting; see IAH west ramp.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post