Mesa
#2341
Wow no kidding?! So if you have 1000 SIC (because that's all that 121.436 requires as I read it) and the ATP you're good for the upgrade at Mesa?
#2342
Quote:
Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
Mesa's contract essentially allows you to upgrade at whatever the minimum FAA reqs are to be a 121 CA. AKA ATP + the 1000 hours 121/135(k)PIC/etc. time requirement (121.436).
Wow no kidding?! So if you have 1000 SIC (because that's all that 121.436 requires as I read it) and the ATP you're good for the upgrade at Mesa?
Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
Mesa's contract essentially allows you to upgrade at whatever the minimum FAA reqs are to be a 121 CA. AKA ATP + the 1000 hours 121/135(k)PIC/etc. time requirement (121.436).
Wow no kidding?! So if you have 1000 SIC (because that's all that 121.436 requires as I read it) and the ATP you're good for the upgrade at Mesa?
#2343
Studying our EJET CFM and it appears all checklists are about three times as long as they were for the same aircraft at RAH. (Facepalm) Typical Mesa.
Skillett? Thoughts?
Skillett? Thoughts?
#2348
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CL-65
Posts: 157
And yet i am unable to get a clear answer on what exactly qualifies. Specifically if a person say flys a 1900 or Metro 3 on a scheduled route (ups /dhl) does that qualify? The planes back in the day were operated as regionals so the plane you would think qualifies and is operated as a scheduled service, only without passengers
#2350
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,602
And yet i am unable to get a clear answer on what exactly qualifies. Specifically if a person say flys a 1900 or Metro 3 on a scheduled route (ups /dhl) does that qualify? The planes back in the day were operated as regionals so the plane you would think qualifies and is operated as a scheduled service, only without passengers
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post