New Mesa Thread
#4971
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Likes: 0
I'm pretty sure the opposite of what you said is the case. Mesa is one of the only contract airlines out there that HAS a training contract now. (Outside of ATP-CTP)
#4973
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Slaveaway:
"That's what I did. So far I just received a email from Mesa demanding I pay them."
Unless they screwed you in some way then why not just pay them as you'd agreed as that's the right thing to do? If the company treated you in a way that was unfair and unlike its treatment of all other employees then I can see how you might have a justifiable argument for not repaying them as was agreed. Short of that, then I'd say that YES you owe the specified pro-rated amount back. As painful as that may seem, it's just that simple. After all, if we're to consider ALL things that could be allowing a company to make an argument for not paying its employees better this would be another example ... money lost on training 'jumpers'. If you have someplace better to go then I'm not saying 'don't go'. I'm just saying that it's fair for you to be held to repay the prorated training amount and not leave the deficit behind for others to take the hit for.
And, flaps is right, it definitely isn't worth the damage that your personal credit could suffer. Just like PRIA, that crap can follow you around for a long, long time. A lot of employers are actually more understanding of a failed checkride than they are of not paying your bills. In their minds, they can easily give you the training you might need to get your skills up to speed, but they don't have the time nor intention to teach financial responsibility. If you can't pay what you owe then at least see if you can work out some arrangement or borrow the money from someone else if you have to.
I feel for you though to be in this position. It's absurd that someone, anyone, who flys jets near the stratosphere with 75 souls on board for a living should even have to think about how to pay their bills. But that's another discussion.
"That's what I did. So far I just received a email from Mesa demanding I pay them."
Unless they screwed you in some way then why not just pay them as you'd agreed as that's the right thing to do? If the company treated you in a way that was unfair and unlike its treatment of all other employees then I can see how you might have a justifiable argument for not repaying them as was agreed. Short of that, then I'd say that YES you owe the specified pro-rated amount back. As painful as that may seem, it's just that simple. After all, if we're to consider ALL things that could be allowing a company to make an argument for not paying its employees better this would be another example ... money lost on training 'jumpers'. If you have someplace better to go then I'm not saying 'don't go'. I'm just saying that it's fair for you to be held to repay the prorated training amount and not leave the deficit behind for others to take the hit for.
And, flaps is right, it definitely isn't worth the damage that your personal credit could suffer. Just like PRIA, that crap can follow you around for a long, long time. A lot of employers are actually more understanding of a failed checkride than they are of not paying your bills. In their minds, they can easily give you the training you might need to get your skills up to speed, but they don't have the time nor intention to teach financial responsibility. If you can't pay what you owe then at least see if you can work out some arrangement or borrow the money from someone else if you have to.
I feel for you though to be in this position. It's absurd that someone, anyone, who flys jets near the stratosphere with 75 souls on board for a living should even have to think about how to pay their bills. But that's another discussion.
#4974
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
I didn't leave right after IOE. I was a great employee at Mesa for 11.5 months. Sorry but a type rating is the cost of doing business. I agree it's selfish to leave right after training but I feel that Mesa got their investment with me.
To be fair I may just be a man and use some of my new hire bonus to pay off the 2k.
Karma right?
To be fair I may just be a man and use some of my new hire bonus to pay off the 2k.
Karma right?
#4975
Covfefe
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
I didn't leave right after IOE. I was a great employee at Mesa for 11.5 months. Sorry but a type rating is the cost of doing business. I agree it's selfish to leave right after training but I feel that Mesa got their investment with me.
To be fair I may just be a man and use some of my new hire bonus to pay off the 2k.
Karma right?
To be fair I may just be a man and use some of my new hire bonus to pay off the 2k.
Karma right?
#4977
You are so management. First, on a legal bases, employment contracts are worth less than the paper it is printed on. Google "right-to-work". It is a non-binding honorary piece of paper. Second, they cannot ding your credit, because the contract is not legal in Arizona. Don't listen to Mr. Trim, he/she does not know what they are talking about.
I can assure you that I'm NOT pro-management. Far from it. What I am though is pro me being able to sleep at night. If everybody took the mindset that it's OK to screw somebody simply because you can get away with it then what kind of world would that be? I know that there's a lot to be desired as far as things that can be improved here. But, let's address those each at face value and on their own merits, OK? As far as training goes and the contract, they make it perfectly clear that they expect you to stay for at least one year. For their end of it, they promise to train you to ATP standards while receiving a type rating in the CRJ or 175. And they do. That is ALL that is promised with the contract. Nothing more, nothing less and, in that regard, they keep their end of the bargain. If you want to subsequently turn around and use everything else that you find you don't like about the company as justification to welch on the deal, then that's on you. While I might completely agree that all the rest sucks, I can't self-justify breaking the deal when it's only tenets have, in fact, been met. The rest is extraneous. Sorry, if we disagree but I don't roll that way. And, when I give a handshake there's absolute certainty behind it where yours, IMO, is about as useless as a soup sandwich.
Last edited by Out Of Trim; 03-01-2016 at 08:34 PM.
#4978
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
I never claimed to be an expert on Arizona law, as you apparently are. And, frankly, I couldn't care less whether, or not, they can legally go after you. That's not the point. The point is that if you enter into an agreement with somebody, then unless you were lied to and the other party didn't hold up to their end of the bargain, you should honor yours. That's just the right thing to do. It doesn't matter whether, or not, the other party can use the law to force you to because they shouldn't have to do that.
I can assure you that I'm NOT pro-management. Far from it. What I am though is pro me being able to sleep at night. If everybody took the mindset that it's OK to screw somebody simply because you can get away with it then what kind of world would that be? I know that there's a lot to be desired as far as things that can be improved here. But, let's address those each at face value and on their own merits, OK? As far as training goes and the contract, they make it perfectly clear that they expect you to stay for at least one year. For their end of it, they promise to train you to ATP standards while receiving a type rating in the CRJ or 175. And they do. That is ALL that is promised with the contract. Nothing more, nothing less and, in that regard, they keep their end of the bargain. If you want to subsequently turn around and use everything else that you find you don't like about the company as justification to welch on the deal, then that's on you. While I might completely agree that all the rest sucks, I can't self-justify breaking the deal when it's only tenets have, in fact, been met. The rest is extraneous. Sorry, if we disagree but I don't roll that way. And, when I give a handshake there's absolute certainty behind it where yours, IMO, is about as useless as a soup sandwich.
I can assure you that I'm NOT pro-management. Far from it. What I am though is pro me being able to sleep at night. If everybody took the mindset that it's OK to screw somebody simply because you can get away with it then what kind of world would that be? I know that there's a lot to be desired as far as things that can be improved here. But, let's address those each at face value and on their own merits, OK? As far as training goes and the contract, they make it perfectly clear that they expect you to stay for at least one year. For their end of it, they promise to train you to ATP standards while receiving a type rating in the CRJ or 175. And they do. That is ALL that is promised with the contract. Nothing more, nothing less and, in that regard, they keep their end of the bargain. If you want to subsequently turn around and use everything else that you find you don't like about the company as justification to welch on the deal, then that's on you. While I might completely agree that all the rest sucks, I can't self-justify breaking the deal when it's only tenets have, in fact, been met. The rest is extraneous. Sorry, if we disagree but I don't roll that way. And, when I give a handshake there's absolute certainty behind it where yours, IMO, is about as useless as a soup sandwich.
Point is the company is expected to hold up their end of a "deal" by not giving free handouts behind the pilot groups back.
#4979
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Let's say you get married; you're committing the rest of your life with this one person. It's a deal, a contract. Well sometimes years down the road life happens and you get this thing called a divorce, essentially breaking a contract. Are you telling me you don't trust any divorcee because he/she "didn't hold up their end of a bargain"? Same thing with Mesa. Life happens, and better opportunity exists.
#4980
I signed a training contract and came here knowing what Mesa is like, and would fulfill any obligations I signed on for. You missed my point. We are talking about something completely different. We are talking about the merits of having a training contract and collectively refusing to sign one.
It's just as fair for you to walk out of a job for another better place, even after they paid to train you, as it is for them to furlough you right after you quit your old job and hired you. It's a risk. It's a risk that they bring you on board and you bail to greener pastures. Your reading comprehension is fantastic by the way.
Still waiting for your list of every regional except skywest that has a training contract.
It's just as fair for you to walk out of a job for another better place, even after they paid to train you, as it is for them to furlough you right after you quit your old job and hired you. It's a risk. It's a risk that they bring you on board and you bail to greener pastures. Your reading comprehension is fantastic by the way.
Still waiting for your list of every regional except skywest that has a training contract.
I'm still trying to figure out, however, why you would come to the conclusion that it's OK to screw one employer you're with just because you perceive that some other employer is screwing their employees ... as in your example of reneging on a training contract you entered into with your present employer because some other airline has a habit of hiring and then furloughing (which isn't entirely true BTW).
Is it fair to quickly bail for a greener pasture as you mentioned? Absolutely. Even if they sank a sizeable amount into your training? Absolutely. If you signed a training contract that prohibits that? Absolutely not.
As for the list of regionals with training contracts ... fair enough. I'll see what I can do because it's been a while since I was last in the job shopping market and, as wide-open as things are right now, perhaps things have changed somewhat. Bear in mind though ... just because they don't state anything about it on their websites or because it isn't mentioned on APC doesn't mean one doesn't exist. When I considered switching a while back I didn't hear a thing about it until I was in the interview and then it was an "oh, by-the-way" thing. I'll reach out to some buds in several other lines to find out if they still do actually have them in place. Give me a little time though, this isn't my only job.
BTW, ex-navy here so I guess this is only normal ...
Last edited by Out Of Trim; 03-01-2016 at 09:20 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



