Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa 3.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2018 | 03:11 AM
  #5761  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Out Of Trim
Industry full of liars yes. Was/is ATL ever going to happen ... of course not. Does the CPP mean one single person is really going to get to United any faster ... don’t hold your breath. But, if you look at the things that really are happening, the one truth is that there’s a bad moon a rising for Mesa, especially on the United side. And, don’t be surprised when the same thing happens in DFW not long afterwards with SkyWest muscling their way in. Mesa is in a tug of war that they’re losing, and management has no answers.
Well, if the CPP is ever implemented here like it is at Xjet, then yes, guys will get to United much more. United currently takes 60% of their new hires through the CPP. With increased United hiring, that 60% has to expand.

I just don’t think the CPP will ever be implemented. United isn’t going to help the American system. No other regional in the CPP has proposed allowing American-based pilots access to the program - only Mesa.

I guess it is possible a compromise will be worked out, but I see the CPP going the way of ATL. It will be dangled out there for 6 months, and then die.
Reply
Old 04-26-2018 | 03:50 AM
  #5762  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by calmwinds
Well, if the CPP is ever implemented here like it is at Xjet, then yes, guys will get to United much more. United currently takes 60% of their new hires through the CPP. With increased United hiring, that 60% has to expand.

I just don’t think the CPP will ever be implemented. United isn’t going to help the American system. No other regional in the CPP has proposed allowing American-based pilots access to the program - only Mesa.

I guess it is possible a compromise will be worked out, but I see the CPP going the way of ATL. It will be dangled out there for 6 months, and then die.
Expressjet was flying for AA and Delta when they received the CPP
Reply
Old 04-26-2018 | 03:56 AM
  #5763  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by giggity37
Expressjet was flying for AA and Delta when they received the CPP
But the only guys eligible are active UAX pilots and always have been.

Last edited by calmwinds; 04-26-2018 at 04:10 AM.
Reply
Old 04-26-2018 | 04:29 AM
  #5764  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by calmwinds
But the only guys eligible are active UAX pilots and always have been.
That's because the CRJ's never flew for UA. You could seperate the requirements at ExpressJet by aircraft type.

You can't do that here. THe big differnce between CPP and ATL is CPP has United's name on it and required negotiations and approval from United. ATL is a Mesa decision all the way.
Reply
Old 04-26-2018 | 05:12 AM
  #5765  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sennant
That's because the CRJ's never flew for UA. You could seperate the requirements at ExpressJet by aircraft type.

You can't do that here. THe big differnce between CPP and ATL is CPP has United's name on it and required negotiations and approval from United. ATL is a Mesa decision all the way.
United and Xjet didn’t separate it by aircraft type. They separated it publicly by being based as an UAX pilot. The exact same way it was initially rolled out here and the exact same way it is rolled out at all the other regionals.

I don’t see United as the bottleneck to the CPP being rolled out to UAX based pilots at Mesa either, I see Mesa as the bottleneck.
Reply
Old 04-26-2018 | 10:42 AM
  #5766  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by calmwinds
United currently takes 60% of their new hires through the CPP.
This is not a correct statement.
Reply
Old 04-26-2018 | 11:09 AM
  #5767  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PhantomHawk
This is not a correct statement.
Correct it, then....
Reply
Old 04-26-2018 | 11:36 AM
  #5768  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Default

XJT is 25%.
Air Wisconsin hasn’t been publicly released, nor has CommutAir.
Lufthansa’s flight school in Phoenix doesn’t have a specific number, but it’s single digit numbers of pilots so far. Mesa’s amount is TBD or being kept a secret.
Where did you get 60% from?? You honestly think United is going to limit the rest of their options down to 40% for military and OTS?

The only people to make it to UAL via the CPP so far have been XJT and Commutair, as well as a small handful of Lufthansa CFIs. Air Wisconsin hasn’t sent a single pilot yet. A far cry from 60%.
Reply
Old 04-26-2018 | 11:42 AM
  #5769  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PhantomHawk
XJT is 25%.
Air Wisconsin hasn’t been publicly released, nor has CommutAir. Lufthansa’s flight school in Phoenix doesn’t have a specific number, but it’s single digit numbers of pilots so far. Mesa’s amount is TBD or being kept a secret.
Where did you get 60% from?? You honestly think United is going to limit the rest of their options down to 40% for military and OTS?
United HR. They can lie. I could have misunderstood them. I thought you had facts.

And, I don’t think United limits their options at all. They take pilots where they can get them.

What I do know is that very, very few pilots come out of non-CPP partners. For example, SkyWest publishes where their pilots go and only 1% go to United.
Reply
Old 04-26-2018 | 11:59 AM
  #5770  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Default

Fact 1: XJT CPP is 25%

Fact 2: Commutair CPP is 10% or less. Their whole pilot group is only about 250 people.

Fact 3: Air Wisconsin hasn’t sent a single pilot yet. So for now, that’s 0%. Subject to change.

Fact 4: The CFIs from Phoenix are less than 10. That’s not a percentage. I mean TEN.

Soooooo......you can add all that up and try to imagine a world where that comes out to 60%........and you can also believe every word a recruiter tells you......

But you shouldn’t go around repeating it like you know what you’re talking about, as you clearly like to do with a massive sense of self-importance already.

For the sake of discussion, let’s say they are GOING to do that. That’s a HUGE leap from where we are. You being told 60% are coming from CPP carriers is akin to your company telling people there’s going to be an ATL base. You don’t seem to approve of that sort of thing, so I hope anybody listening to you does some extra bit of searching. The information I have provided is readily available all over these forums.

Fact 5: You like to hear yourself talk.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
rabsing76
Mesa Airlines
233
10-20-2017 08:59 AM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
CaribPilot
Regional
14
07-06-2008 06:37 PM
Squawk8800
Regional
5
04-08-2008 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices