Search

Notices
NetJets Fractional Operator

NetJets vs Flexjet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2023 | 06:29 AM
  #151  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by followingdreams
Can you contradict yourself anymore? You are saying the lack of Unions is not why Flex has gained, it’s just due to the pilot shortage just like "Delta, Alaska, Spirit, etc.". So if it’s SIMPLY due to the pilot shortage and NOT due to more flexibility by not having a Union, why hasnt NJ made the same advancements? Are they not facing a pilot shortage as bad as Delta????
Do you think Ricci wanted the union out because he wanted the flexibility to pay you more or do you think he wanted it so he can do his will when times are tough? I think the more pay that you got when the union was voted out was gonna be necessary anyway and was planned.
Reply
Old 03-23-2023 | 06:49 AM
  #152  
B727DRVR's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 6
From: Standing in front of the tank with a shopping bag
Exclamation We all owe NJ Pilots a debt of gratitude..

Originally Posted by followingdreams
Again, you are contradicting yourself...There is a pilot shortage, therefore, pay goes up, basic supply and demand economics we were taught in High School. Then you say "our gains have led to your gains", is it the pilot shortage or your gains? If you believe NJ is the center of the 135/91k market and pay at all operators is a function strictly of NJ, how do you fit your ego into your blazer? There are MANY pilots who are not represented by a union that is making WAY more money then they were in the past are you saying that is due to NJ? Do you believe NJ would be paying you what they are paying you IF THERE WAS NOT A PILOT SHORTAGE just because you have a union? SInce times are good for us (as in pilots) now, you have been able to go back to a well and get concessions (yes, the same concessions Flex has had to give to be comeptitive without a union). When times go bad, do you not think NJ is going to come back to the Union and ask for concessions?
Respectfully, your assertions show a lack of knowledge in the history of Part 91K/Part 135 compensation and working conditions before the Netjets pilots stood up and fought for us all. In 2002, after 9/11, Netjets was one of the ONLY companies hiring from a pool of THOUSANDS of furloughed airline pilots on the street. Working conditions there were awful, IMHO, at the time where you could only live in 5 bases, you had to be in position 12 hours before duty on, and starting pay for an Ultra was $28,000. 21 years is not that long ago that $28,000 was a lot of money. Many jobs, including Flex and Flight Options, were considered better.

When the Netjets pilots “stormed the beaches” in 2005 and fought for/earned their Contract ’05 by picketing Wall Street, Berkshire Hathaway HQ, and the Kentucky Derby, ALL pilots in this sector benefitted by the rising tide created by the Netjets industry-Leading Contract, BEFORE any pilot shortage existed (In fact, there was a pilot surplus with many Part 121 pilots still laid off from September 11). It is a known-fact that you can research on this forum, that pay and QOL increased for Flex and other pilots BECAUSE of the downward pressure created by the Netjets pilot’s CBA. Other companies had to raise their compensation and QOL in order to keep their pilots and to dissuade their pilots from organizing their own Unions to mimic the Netjets pilots successes: My former company specifically noted Netjets Contract ‘05 as a reason that we were getting our pay raises and a 7/7 schedule, and other companies were making similar offerings. WE ALL OWE THE Netjets PILOTS A DEBT OF GRATITUDE FOR FIGHTING FOR THEIR Contract ‘05 AND PROVING THAT PART 91K/PART 135 CAN BE A VIABLE CAREER IN THE AVIATION INDUSTRY!

While you are correct that the Pilot Shortage has had a HUGE impact on increasing all pilots pay and benefits today, there was NO pilot shortage in 2005 when the efforts of the Netjets pilots created waters that floated all ships higher. We are all better off because of the heavy lifting of the Netjets pilots, and when just one pilot wins, we all win. Netjets pilots proved that it didn’t take a pilot shortage, or supply and demand, to demand better pay and working conditions for themselves and made their jobs, and ours, into a career.. Finally, remember that the rest of the non-represented pilots being at-will employees, those gains can be taken away at any time on the whim of our respective managements, including Flex. Netjets, and all Part 121 pilots, are protected from that through their respective CBA’s.

Last edited by B727DRVR; 03-23-2023 at 07:00 AM.
Reply
Old 03-23-2023 | 07:47 AM
  #153  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 281
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by B727DRVR
And, unlike Netjets pilots who are protected by their CBA, those gains can be taken away at any time, on a whim, by Flex Management.
Absolutely they can, and I can choose to work for them or not, its why I love America! There are many jobs that dont have a Union, and at ANY of them (including the one you work for) the company can make decisions and the employees can make decisions, its the balance of the 2 that makes a company strong. Yes the company will pay us as little as they can to get the pilots they need, and I will work for the maximum I can get at the job I want. You are kidding yourself if you think the REASON NJ pay is what it is is becasue of the Union. NJ will pay the minimum it can to adequatley staff the company. Keep in mind there were unions at regionals not long ago as the regional guys were lucky to make minimum wage.
Reply
Old 03-23-2023 | 07:57 AM
  #154  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 281
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by B727DRVR
Respectfully, your assertions show a lack of knowledge in the history of Part 91K/Part 135 compensation and working conditions before the Netjets pilots stood up and fought for us all. In 2002, after 9/11, Netjets was one of the ONLY companies hiring from a pool of THOUSANDS of furloughed airline pilots on the street. Working conditions there were awful, IMHO, at the time where you could only live in 5 bases, you had to be in position 12 hours before duty on, and starting pay for an Ultra was $28,000. 21 years is not that long ago that $28,000 was a lot of money. Many jobs, including Flex and Flight Options, were considered better.

When the Netjets pilots “stormed the beaches” in 2005 and fought for/earned their Contract ’05 by picketing Wall Street, Berkshire Hathaway HQ, and the Kentucky Derby, ALL pilots in this sector benefitted by the rising tide created by the Netjets industry-Leading Contract, BEFORE any pilot shortage existed (In fact, there was a pilot surplus with many Part 121 pilots still laid off from September 11). It is a known-fact that you can research on this forum, that pay and QOL increased for Flex and other pilots BECAUSE of the downward pressure created by the Netjets pilot’s CBA. Other companies had to raise their compensation and QOL in order to keep their pilots and to dissuade their pilots from organizing their own Unions to mimic the Netjets pilots successes: My former company specifically noted Netjets Contract ‘05 as a reason that we were getting our pay raises and a 7/7 schedule, and other companies were making similar offerings. WE ALL OWE THE Netjets PILOTS A DEBT OF GRATITUDE FOR FIGHTING FOR THEIR Contract ‘05 AND PROVING THAT PART 91K/PART 135 CAN BE A VIABLE CAREER IN THE AVIATION INDUSTRY!

While you are correct that the Pilot Shortage has had a HUGE impact on increasing all pilots pay and benefits today, there was NO pilot shortage in 2005 when the efforts of the Netjets pilots created waters that floated all ships higher. We are all better off because of the heavy lifting of the Netjets pilots, and when just one pilot wins, we all win. Netjets pilots proved that it didn’t take a pilot shortage, or supply and demand, to demand better pay and working conditions for themselves and made their jobs, and ours, into a career.. Finally, remember that the rest of the non-represented pilots being at-will employees, those gains can be taken away at any time on the whim of our respective managements, including Flex. Netjets, and all Part 121 pilots, are protected from that through their respective CBA’s.
NJ may have been the biggest, but lets put it in context, what was the annual salary of a 1st year FO before and 1st year FO after they "stormed the beaches". The entire aviation industry is responsible for the wages we have. Keep in mind a CURRENT 1st year FO is ONLY guaranteed $79k (on the 8/6) where Flex is guaranteed $106k (comparable 8/6). When did NJ become unionized?
Reply
Old 03-23-2023 | 08:02 AM
  #155  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by followingdreams
NJ may have been the biggest, but lets put it in context, what was the annual salary of a 1st year FO before and 1st year FO after they "stormed the beaches". The entire aviation industry is responsible for the wages we have. Keep in mind a CURRENT 1st year FO is ONLY guaranteed $79k (on the 8/6) where Flex is guaranteed $106k (comparable 8/6). When did NJ become unionized?
And yet flex pilots continually get hired here but I’ve never heard of a netjets pilot go to flex.
Reply
Old 03-23-2023 | 11:17 AM
  #156  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ExecJet99
The pilots are only taking advantage of what the union screwed up. We lost all our leverage when they didn’t sunset the 2.5 when they had the chance. The company has no reason to negotiate, and are showing it. 50ish people are showing up to class with 1000 hours each and if they stick around 2 years it’s still cheaper than us old 20 plus year folks. Add all the pilots working extra days for 2.5 to the mix, they can wait us out and hope for a recession. BTW.. how many would be extending like crazy for 1.5?

Apparently we do make Delta wages..you just have to work 50 more days a year than they do!
The union people know they screwed up with that LOA in December. That's why the full assault now with the picketing and WSJ ads. According to the MB, 75% of new-hires are recommended. The class of 53 that started on Monday coupled with the VAWD's leaves us with a shortsighted pilot group with no leverage.
Reply
Old 03-23-2023 | 12:22 PM
  #157  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 431
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by HeavyD
The union people know they screwed up with that LOA in December. That's why the full assault now with the picketing and WSJ ads. According to the MB, 75% of new-hires are recommended. The class of 53 that started on Monday coupled with the VAWD's leaves us with a shortsighted pilot group with no leverage.

The pilots at NJA who have been longing for airline wages and treatment have been waiting forever. It ain't coming...
Reply
Old 03-23-2023 | 12:41 PM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ExecJet99
The pilots are only taking advantage of what the union screwed up. We lost all our leverage when they didn’t sunset the 2.5 when they had the chance. The company has no reason to negotiate, and are showing it. 50ish people are showing up to class with 1000 hours each and if they stick around 2 years it’s still cheaper than us old 20 plus year folks. Add all the pilots working extra days for 2.5 to the mix, they can wait us out and hope for a recession. BTW.. how many would be extending like crazy for 1.5?

Apparently we do make Delta wages..you just have to work 50 more days a year than they do!
This is correct. And because of the initial spin on that LOA, there’s no way back. It was sold as a way to keep the company profitable so we can get a slice of a bigger pie.

Even if it were legal to suggest a reduction in VAWD/VEDs (and I am in no way doing so) what would that say? Now we want the pie to be smaller?

Just like FDP, this was a colossal mistake.
Reply
Old 03-23-2023 | 12:44 PM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
The pilots at NJA who have been longing for airline wages and treatment have been waiting forever. It ain't coming...
Not even going to be close.
Reply
Old 03-23-2023 | 12:58 PM
  #160  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 431
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by FracCracka
Not even going to be close.
Nope.

Honestly, it's ok too. NetJets isn't an airline. You can make decent money there and live in places outside of an airline domicile. Not everyone wants to work at an airline and wants/needs airline wages and benefits. For better or worse, NetJets is in its own exclusive industry category.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wingfoot2016
Flexjet
1
04-21-2019 02:11 PM
Jeckyl
NetJets
16
06-05-2015 05:06 AM
Sata 4000 RP
NetJets
0
06-03-2013 10:44 AM
AIRrAMBO
Fractional
2
02-25-2007 06:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices