Search

Notices
NetJets Fractional Operator

Netjets latest & greatest:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-2017 | 09:42 AM
  #2831  
av8trinabarrel's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mooneymite
The word I got is that the company's interest in the issue is rooted in the fact that there are presently too high a percentage of captains...not specifically an age issue. It's a money issue.

Because there is no contractual way of downgrading captains to FO, the company sees the age 65 issue as a way of getting rid of 144 (?) captains who make too much and hiring new FOs at less than half the pay. The FOs over age 65 are just collateral damage.
When the vast majority of the folks leaving are fo's, that percentage is tilting the curve even higher.
Reply
Old 10-24-2017 | 11:12 AM
  #2832  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bjtdrvr
And yet perfectly good airplanes keep getting run off of the end of runways without old pilots in them!!!!!! Cowboy pilots are a far worse danger than old pilots!!!!! And are far more likely to cause your above senario.
"perfectly good airplanes"
Phenom 300 does not fall into that category.

How about the Falcon 2000 that landed at the wrong airport last year?
Regardless, passengers feel less safe with old pilots.
Reply
Old 10-24-2017 | 01:46 PM
  #2833  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by av8trinabarrel
When the vast majority of the folks leaving are fo's, that percentage is tilting the curve even higher.
That curve only further serves their desire do downsize. You lose FOs, the ratio between captain and FO changes, all of a sudden you have too many captains and boom, downgrades, which the company will be able to do I believe on Jan 1 per the contract.
Reply
Old 10-24-2017 | 02:09 PM
  #2834  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Default

And passengers don't feel safe with young looking pilots either.
Reply
Old 10-24-2017 | 02:17 PM
  #2835  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bjtdrvr
And passengers don't feel safe with young looking pilots either.
Says who??
Reply
Old 10-24-2017 | 03:47 PM
  #2836  
av8trinabarrel's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bjtdrvr
And passengers don't feel safe with young looking pilots either.
Perception is reality and reality is I've had more than one owner ask if the Elderly gentlemen I'm paired with is ok to fly. Sure I've been paired with a few young guys that look as if they just rolled out of bed and have no self pride or professionalism at all. Its a numbers game any way you wanna cut it. Some good and some bad everywhere.

I know I'd be ****ed being forced out if I were you, but you can either plan for it or keep telling yourself everyone is out to get you. NJ needs to get rid of handfuls of our elderly and it just so happens many of our competent elderly are getting the boot as well. Like I was told after I was furloughed here and many didn't give a damn while picking up extended days......Its just business!!
Reply
Old 10-24-2017 | 04:03 PM
  #2837  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 FO
Default

Originally Posted by bjtdrvr
And passengers don't feel safe with young looking pilots either.


#fakenews


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 10-24-2017 | 04:12 PM
  #2838  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by G550Guy
#fakenews


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The company is expanding, and actually thinking about going to age 70.
Reply
Old 10-24-2017 | 04:13 PM
  #2839  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by G550Guy
#fakenews


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
are there any pilots under the age of 30 right now?
Reply
Old 10-24-2017 | 04:51 PM
  #2840  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: FE, FO, CAPT.
Default

Originally Posted by Jetlife
.... You lose FOs, the ratio between captain and FO changes, all of a sudden you have too many captains ......
When a FO leaves, he is replaced by a new FO. Nothing changes until a captain leaves.

Since the older FO's aren't going anywhere, the age 65 rule getting rid of them actually hurts the company. What the company needs is a "no captains over 65" rule.

Getting rid of pilots with the looming pilot shortage.....? The short term savings might be over-shadowed by a long term reality.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sata 4000 RP
NetJets
0
06-03-2013 10:44 AM
Bucking Bar
Major
14
08-31-2011 03:02 AM
Mason32
Regional
277
07-27-2010 06:01 PM
Scott34567
Regional
41
05-29-2008 07:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices