Piedmont or Endeavor?
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Average civilian time is still 5500-7000 hours which is 6-7 years at a regional. Flow is 4-6 depending on when you are hired at Piedmont that is a guaranteed job just go to class. No going to job fairs getting resume ready paying consultants, updating your logbook.
Btw our junior upgrade is 6 months on property. We can get PIC at 1000 hours of 121 time. We can get hired at other majors just like everyone else. We are not locked into flowing. PSA had more pilots leave for Delta last month than flow to American.
What is the upgrade time at Endeavor now is it still 1,000 hours? I agree getting PIC time is better than hoping for a flow. It worked for 700 pilots but it's no guarantee that it will work for everyone. Smart guys are applying at all majors not just waiting for the flow. The flow is a last resort. You can even get hired at American before the flow by standing in line like everyone else and applying.
Btw our junior upgrade is 6 months on property. We can get PIC at 1000 hours of 121 time. We can get hired at other majors just like everyone else. We are not locked into flowing. PSA had more pilots leave for Delta last month than flow to American.
What is the upgrade time at Endeavor now is it still 1,000 hours? I agree getting PIC time is better than hoping for a flow. It worked for 700 pilots but it's no guarantee that it will work for everyone. Smart guys are applying at all majors not just waiting for the flow. The flow is a last resort. You can even get hired at American before the flow by standing in line like everyone else and applying.
#32
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 126
Likes: 1
Not sure what you are talking about. There is a benefit to the flow. It is not "useless" as others have said. It actually has great value to everyone on property.
I would recommend PDT because they are stable, growing, and a good operation with a bright future.
Sorry, but I can not say the same about Endeavor.
I would recommend PDT because they are stable, growing, and a good operation with a bright future.
Sorry, but I can not say the same about Endeavor.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
A 2017 Piedmont new hire will upgrade to Captain faster than a 2017 Endeavor pilot which has over 500 2015 new hires they have to go through before their number comes up.
Upgrade faster and no reserve on either side means more money. That is not including 300% overtime pay which will be ongoing as we get our jet deliveries.
Upgrade faster and no reserve on either side means more money. That is not including 300% overtime pay which will be ongoing as we get our jet deliveries.
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: CaptFo
A 2017 Piedmont new hire will upgrade to Captain faster than a 2017 Endeavor pilot which has over 500 2015 new hires they have to go through before their number comes up.
Upgrade faster and no reserve on either side means more money. That is not including 300% overtime pay which will be ongoing as we get our jet deliveries.
Upgrade faster and no reserve on either side means more money. That is not including 300% overtime pay which will be ongoing as we get our jet deliveries.
Regionals are in a major battle with each other recruiting, and in my opinion the ones that offer CASH + FLOW will receive higher numbers. It's just a overall better package!
I'm a 10 plus year regional guy, so what do I know?..don't listen to my advice 👌 Had I gone elsewhere 10 years ago...a flow would have saved my butt!
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
A 2017 Piedmont new hire will upgrade to Captain faster than a 2017 Endeavor pilot which has over 500 2015 new hires they have to go through before their number comes up.
Upgrade faster and no reserve on either side means more money. That is not including 300% overtime pay which will be ongoing as we get our jet deliveries.
Upgrade faster and no reserve on either side means more money. That is not including 300% overtime pay which will be ongoing as we get our jet deliveries.
How many flow to AA in 2017?
Endeavor 14+ new A/C in 2017.
120-180 pilots to Delta I think in 2017.
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: CaptFo
I think new AC is a plus however one thing to consider at Endeavor is stagnation. The double no/non participant SSPers are lifers most likely. The number is a hard one to narrow down. The 200's coming will help with movement, but without some relief from the top seniority we might be looking at stagnation. I definitely could be wrong, we shall see....Again...Endeavor is a great place to be!, but other regionals have stepped up recently, and they have some relief from up top with flow.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
From: 175 CA
Average civilian time is still 5500-7000 hours which is 6-7 years at a regional. Flow is 4-6 depending on when you are hired at Piedmont that is a guaranteed job just go to class. No going to job fairs getting resume ready paying consultants, updating your logbook.
Btw our junior upgrade is 6 months on property. We can get PIC at 1000 hours of 121 time. We can get hired at other majors just like everyone else. We are not locked into flowing. PSA had more pilots leave for Delta last month than flow to American.
What is the upgrade time at Endeavor now is it still 1,000 hours? I agree getting PIC time is better than hoping for a flow. It worked for 700 pilots but it's no guarantee that it will work for everyone. Smart guys are applying at all majors not just waiting for the flow. The flow is a last resort. You can even get hired at American before the flow by standing in line like everyone else and applying.
Btw our junior upgrade is 6 months on property. We can get PIC at 1000 hours of 121 time. We can get hired at other majors just like everyone else. We are not locked into flowing. PSA had more pilots leave for Delta last month than flow to American.
What is the upgrade time at Endeavor now is it still 1,000 hours? I agree getting PIC time is better than hoping for a flow. It worked for 700 pilots but it's no guarantee that it will work for everyone. Smart guys are applying at all majors not just waiting for the flow. The flow is a last resort. You can even get hired at American before the flow by standing in line like everyone else and applying.
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
We should be receiving at least 2 planes a month, 3 certain months apparently, putting that at 24-30 planes granted some dashes are being retired # unknown.
Key point in this debate of growth is the sheer percentage of growth, piedmont will be over 700 pilots by the end of 2017 and started with less than 400 at the beginning of 2016. The flow number increases with the number of pilots on property and I believe the goal is significantly more than 700. Everyone on property moves up a large percentage of seniority based on our small size and relatively large classes. Not to mention the large number (approximately 100 pilots) not flowing. With these numbers it will be 4 a month for about the first 3 months than 5 the rest of the year possibly 6 the last couple months that is at least 67 flowing, not bad for pilot X who was 370 at the beginning of 2016 with only 270 ahead of them, counting 0 attrition above them that's putting that pilot at a 4 year flow if it makes it to 6 a month which it will easily be at this rate in 2018 that puts them at 2.1 years to flow from the beginning of 2018 after being hired the beginning of 2016 with ZERO, one more time ZERO attrition outside the flow. Also continuous realistic growth at the pace PDT is hiring it could be 7 a month reducing flow time more, while keeping that 4 year mark for people hired throughout 2016 and 2017 realistic. These are based off of numbers PDT is realistically achieving through current hiring, and absolutely no attrition. We are in a unique situation with a large group not flowing.
P.S. for PDT to get to 7 a month reducing 2016 flow numbers below 4 a year they just need to hire at the current pace 25 a month (which they are trying to increase) for 11.8 more months with 556 on property currently. Obviously they lose pilots during growth through flow/attrition so if they can hire at that pace for about 15 months a lot of people can seriously be eyeing up a 4 year flow. PDT also doesn't need to hire 50-60 a month just to keep up with attrition and sustained growth like much larger regionals. By the way anyone who says this is a perfect world where nothing bad happens to the airline industry (such as recession) remember if it does it will probably affect all regionals making all there perks (quick upgrade, DGI) be longer/worse not just PDTs.
Key point in this debate of growth is the sheer percentage of growth, piedmont will be over 700 pilots by the end of 2017 and started with less than 400 at the beginning of 2016. The flow number increases with the number of pilots on property and I believe the goal is significantly more than 700. Everyone on property moves up a large percentage of seniority based on our small size and relatively large classes. Not to mention the large number (approximately 100 pilots) not flowing. With these numbers it will be 4 a month for about the first 3 months than 5 the rest of the year possibly 6 the last couple months that is at least 67 flowing, not bad for pilot X who was 370 at the beginning of 2016 with only 270 ahead of them, counting 0 attrition above them that's putting that pilot at a 4 year flow if it makes it to 6 a month which it will easily be at this rate in 2018 that puts them at 2.1 years to flow from the beginning of 2018 after being hired the beginning of 2016 with ZERO, one more time ZERO attrition outside the flow. Also continuous realistic growth at the pace PDT is hiring it could be 7 a month reducing flow time more, while keeping that 4 year mark for people hired throughout 2016 and 2017 realistic. These are based off of numbers PDT is realistically achieving through current hiring, and absolutely no attrition. We are in a unique situation with a large group not flowing.
P.S. for PDT to get to 7 a month reducing 2016 flow numbers below 4 a year they just need to hire at the current pace 25 a month (which they are trying to increase) for 11.8 more months with 556 on property currently. Obviously they lose pilots during growth through flow/attrition so if they can hire at that pace for about 15 months a lot of people can seriously be eyeing up a 4 year flow. PDT also doesn't need to hire 50-60 a month just to keep up with attrition and sustained growth like much larger regionals. By the way anyone who says this is a perfect world where nothing bad happens to the airline industry (such as recession) remember if it does it will probably affect all regionals making all there perks (quick upgrade, DGI) be longer/worse not just PDTs.
700 pilots and 70/yr to flow. minus 100 who wont. 9 years to flow???
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
We should be receiving at least 2 planes a month, 3 certain months apparently, putting that at 24-30 planes granted some dashes are being retired # unknown.
Key point in this debate of growth is the sheer percentage of growth, piedmont will be over 700 pilots by the end of 2017 and started with less than 400 at the beginning of 2016. The flow number increases with the number of pilots on property and I believe the goal is significantly more than 700. Everyone on property moves up a large percentage of seniority based on our small size and relatively large classes. Not to mention the large number (approximately 100 pilots) not flowing. With these numbers it will be 4 a month for about the first 3 months than 5 the rest of the year possibly 6 the last couple months that is at least 67 flowing, not bad for pilot X who was 370 at the beginning of 2016 with only 270 ahead of them, counting 0 attrition above them that's putting that pilot at a 4 year flow if it makes it to 6 a month which it will easily be at this rate in 2018 that puts them at 2.1 years to flow from the beginning of 2018 after being hired the beginning of 2016 with ZERO, one more time ZERO attrition outside the flow. Also continuous realistic growth at the pace PDT is hiring it could be 7 a month reducing flow time more, while keeping that 4 year mark for people hired throughout 2016 and 2017 realistic. These are based off of numbers PDT is realistically achieving through current hiring, and absolutely no attrition. We are in a unique situation with a large group not flowing.
P.S. for PDT to get to 7 a month reducing 2016 flow numbers below 4 a year they just need to hire at the current pace 25 a month (which they are trying to increase) for 11.8 more months with 556 on property currently. Obviously they lose pilots during growth through flow/attrition so if they can hire at that pace for about 15 months a lot of people can seriously be eyeing up a 4 year flow. PDT also doesn't need to hire 50-60 a month just to keep up with attrition and sustained growth like much larger regionals. By the way anyone who says this is a perfect world where nothing bad happens to the airline industry (such as recession) remember if it does it will probably affect all regionals making all there perks (quick upgrade, DGI) be longer/worse not just PDTs.
Key point in this debate of growth is the sheer percentage of growth, piedmont will be over 700 pilots by the end of 2017 and started with less than 400 at the beginning of 2016. The flow number increases with the number of pilots on property and I believe the goal is significantly more than 700. Everyone on property moves up a large percentage of seniority based on our small size and relatively large classes. Not to mention the large number (approximately 100 pilots) not flowing. With these numbers it will be 4 a month for about the first 3 months than 5 the rest of the year possibly 6 the last couple months that is at least 67 flowing, not bad for pilot X who was 370 at the beginning of 2016 with only 270 ahead of them, counting 0 attrition above them that's putting that pilot at a 4 year flow if it makes it to 6 a month which it will easily be at this rate in 2018 that puts them at 2.1 years to flow from the beginning of 2018 after being hired the beginning of 2016 with ZERO, one more time ZERO attrition outside the flow. Also continuous realistic growth at the pace PDT is hiring it could be 7 a month reducing flow time more, while keeping that 4 year mark for people hired throughout 2016 and 2017 realistic. These are based off of numbers PDT is realistically achieving through current hiring, and absolutely no attrition. We are in a unique situation with a large group not flowing.
P.S. for PDT to get to 7 a month reducing 2016 flow numbers below 4 a year they just need to hire at the current pace 25 a month (which they are trying to increase) for 11.8 more months with 556 on property currently. Obviously they lose pilots during growth through flow/attrition so if they can hire at that pace for about 15 months a lot of people can seriously be eyeing up a 4 year flow. PDT also doesn't need to hire 50-60 a month just to keep up with attrition and sustained growth like much larger regionals. By the way anyone who says this is a perfect world where nothing bad happens to the airline industry (such as recession) remember if it does it will probably affect all regionals making all there perks (quick upgrade, DGI) be longer/worse not just PDTs.
Add about 70 pilots per year outside attrition.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



