Search

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

I Love PSA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2013 | 12:13 PM
  #1941  
PilotJ3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 97
Default

Originally Posted by skyxbomb
900s would make more sense. It is more fuel efficient than the 170/175 and the training cost is pretty much non existent. Not only for pilots but also the maintenance and flight attendants. Passengers do prefer the Embraers but we don't have enough gates in E concourse to accommodate them. But the ultimate decision may lie with bombardier and embraer. The management is whipsawing them as they are whipsawing AE and PSA and probably PDT next.
Going out on a limb here, but lets say career progression COULD be improved in whatever agreement takes place. Maybe some sort of flow into the 190 off a 175 actually reduces overall training cost in the long run? That's just a hypothetical.

I personally agree with skyx, 900s are a no brainer cost wise. Even more 700s to replace the aging 200s. Maybe replace all 200s with 700s then add 900s over and above the 49 a/c PSA has? Unless Parker has a big banana in the pants for the 170s since passengers like them so much. Regardless of where the A/C go I wonder if they will be wifi equipped and have features like the new RAH 170s.
I rather have a printer instead of wifi.
Reply
Old 08-05-2013 | 06:40 AM
  #1942  
CaptKrunch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: LeftSeat PA-44
Default

Your assuming these airplanes (IF we get them) will be in Clt. I would guess they will be either ord or dfw. But that is just a guess.
Reply
Old 08-05-2013 | 09:23 AM
  #1943  
PeopleMover90
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKrunch
Your assuming these airplanes (IF we get them) will be in Clt. I would guess they will be either ord or dfw. But that is just a guess.
Throw MIA/DCA/LGA into that mix as well...
Reply
Old 08-05-2013 | 11:22 AM
  #1944  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Ask scheduling
Default

Ok, say you get 170's. what happens with your current fleet? I doubt they'd want to keep you in two separate fleets? 700's to Eagle and 200's parked?
Reply
Old 08-05-2013 | 11:34 AM
  #1945  
PeopleMover90
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by theHub
Ok, say you get 170's. what happens with your current fleet? I doubt they'd want to keep you in two separate fleets? 700's to Eagle and 200's parked?
And train eagle pilots on a new type (145 pilots now 700) which costs $$$ and train PSA guys on a new type? (170) Way too much $$$. If we get 170s or 900s they are either in addition to what we have or replacing the 200s. Keeping them at PSA reduces training costs, when we hire they'll be typed in whatever, leftover from seniority bids to the new aircraft.
Reply
Old 08-07-2013 | 05:12 AM
  #1946  
PilotJ3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 97
Default

Originally Posted by theHub
Ok, say you get 170's. what happens with your current fleet? I doubt they'd want to keep you in two separate fleets? 700's to Eagle and 200's parked?
And train eagle pilots on a new type (145 pilots now 700) which costs $$$ and train PSA guys on a new type? (170) Way too much $$$. If we get 170s or 900s they are either in addition to what we have or replacing the 200s. Keeping them at PSA reduces training costs, when we hire they'll be typed in whatever, leftover from seniority bids to the new aircraft.
They will keep parking eagle e135/140/145. They are already displacing people from the E to the CR7. FOs can't bid other equipment unless they get displaced or is a new type in the company. Which they will only allow us to bid it only the first time. After that only new hires will occupy the leftovers.

Any way they do it will cost too much $$$$. The best way is give them to PDT and eliminate the Dash8.
Reply
Old 08-07-2013 | 05:13 AM
  #1947  
PilotJ3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 97
Default

But then, it will increase PDT operating cost, because they will get a payraise for flying the E175s
Reply
Old 08-07-2013 | 05:24 AM
  #1948  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
From: The Parlor
Default

Originally Posted by PilotJ3
But then, it will increase PDT operating cost, because they will get a payraise for flying the E175s
Doubt much though, the SR guys will vote yes to keep the airline running. Rates are not that much lower than Republic, atleast on the FO side.
Reply
Old 08-07-2013 | 11:16 AM
  #1949  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Default

Not sure how much of a scare tactic it was for airways to come negotiate with psa but apparently eagles opened negotiations with AA for concessions. LoL we never learn.
Reply
Old 08-07-2013 | 11:27 AM
  #1950  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by skyxbomb
Not sure how much of a scare tactic it was for airways to come negotiate with psa but apparently eagles opened negotiations with AA for concessions. LoL we never learn.
Source?

Hahahahaha doubt it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Theonemarine
PSA Airlines
67
05-16-2016 04:13 PM
SkyHigh
Leaving the Career
35
10-20-2008 05:44 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
6
10-02-2008 10:46 PM
alarkyokie
Hangar Talk
5
09-25-2008 03:01 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-19-2005 03:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices