Originally Posted by pagey

To be competitive with DAL.

https://www.facebook.com/video/embed...51825060027518

Originally Posted by What

I'm an AE guy but not one of the chest thumpers around here but I find it funny how you went on a rant about people talking about stuff and they don't know the facts, well sir you don't understand SCOPE.

AA had scope for only 47 CRJ 700 and to be flown American Eagle Airline pilots, they also had SCOPE restriction that if a regional bad airframes larger than 50 seaters on their certificate they couldn't fly 50 seaters for AA. The AA pilots didn't give this away, the judge threw away the APA CBA and this is how this was lost. Now as far as AE, we had guys roll over and have the company 30+ million in concesion but kept longevity and pay rates. But we did take a compensation hit, the W2 have shrunk.

Pinnacle guys went to the judge, Eagle guys didn't!

PSA is voting for concessions in return for airplanes to possibly do Flying another regional currently does, you are being asked by a profitable Airline making record profits to underbid other pilot groups while there aren't pilots to replace you. PSA isn't being asked for cuts to keep what they have, you are being asked to undercut other regionals. We don't know if the airplanes are growth or replacements since the bullet language is weak and leaves much to the imagination.

It's a turd and you can polish it all you want. Eagke guys rolled over the first time and stood up the second time, Pinnacle guys caught like hell but rolled over when the big hammer was brought out. I am straight shooter and gladly debate with you about facts anytime!

I don't care about what PSA did in the past, I care about what PSA will do over the next two weeks as you vote to underbid other regionals or stand your ground!!!

Originally Posted by paxhauler85

Oh, that's it? This is fine then. Vote it in.

You'd think Parker could come up with something better than mimicking Richard Anderson. Rather than argue with regionals over nickels (in their eyes), why not come up with another way to be competitive with DAL? Perhaps enhance the garbage domestic product both airlines (USAirways and AA) offer?

Parker is as stupid and anyone who votes yes for this TA.

Originally Posted by fullflank

Please don't bother argueing with Meyers. In case you missed it, here a link to how he spends his free when he's not on apc. What kind of a man do you think he is? His opinion should mean absolutely nothing to you.

Ohio-SugarBabyMale

Originally Posted by SkylineAviation

Well Meyers, seems like you have it all figured out. There's probably nothing in this world you don't know either. While there are some on here just trolling around, many others have given sound advice...which you totally disregard and disrespect people. There's just no talking to you.

You will get everything you deserve one way or another with your attitude. Best of luck to you pilot group, it would be better served without you.

Originally Posted by crzipilot

And how the hell do you "vote on rates" but not on airplanes? If your negotiating a pay rate for a new airframe on the property.....there is usually some discussion on the airplanes being flown on that property.

So why don't you have your NC negotiate some A320 rates....?!?!?

Originally Posted by What

PSA is voting for concessions in return for airplanes to possibly do Flying another regional currently does, you are being asked by a profitable Airline making record profits to underbid other pilot groups while there aren't pilots to replace you.

Originally Posted by meyers9163

I will not be taking a pay cut with this deal.... SO I am suppose to say NO?