Search

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

I Love PSA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2013 | 10:14 AM
  #2711  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly


- A "promise" of mainline interview only (no flow) and if you're turned down for any reason (perhaps they need you at PSA more ?), your pay is frozen, is it not ?
Rest assured, many if not most will be turned down the minute PSA has an issue with staffing.

Place loves to make lifers out of runt hogs with no legacy.
Reply
Old 09-20-2013 | 10:52 AM
  #2712  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Gofish
Rest assured, many if not most will be turned down the minute PSA has an issue with staffing.
......which, PSA being a regional and looking at the future regional staffing pool, will mean 90% plus get a "thanks, but no thanks" letter.

Originally Posted by Gofish
Place loves to make lifers out of runt hogs with no legacy.
PM90 and like-minded chums thus have no clue they're actually sailing directly TOWARD the perfect storm instead of riding the tide away from it. They fail to make the 5-10% (just to avoid lawsuits), their pay is frozen, their health care climbs 25% or more and they remain bent over at 120 degrees with their face in the crew room carpet getting rammed in the outflow valve by scheduling practices that exist under a "few rules" mentality and horrid staffing.

God, what a nightmare..........and what suckers.
Reply
Old 09-20-2013 | 11:26 AM
  #2713  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by PeopleMover90
I beg your pardon, but most folks will make MORE. Quicker upgrade. We get a raise too- we get the airplanes at the negotiated -900/175 rate. So unless you are a year 11 captain getting capped, or similar scenario.... You're wrong. Or you can re word what you're saying to take the caps into account by those it'll affect. But if you aren't affected by a cap, most FOs are looking at gaining tens of thousands of dollars due to upgrade. We are currently stagnant as anything. 0 movement.
yeah.. ok. pass the TA and let me know how all that works out for you.. maybe thats what you need is a dose of reality.. I didnt read 'quicker upgrade' in that TA of yours.. have a section reference for me?

a 10% raise in healthcare costs isnt making less money? You're hoping you get 900's. Could be 700's, which are at your current rates.. = pay cut


Good Luck you Blue Streakers!
Exactly. Company gets instant concessions, and only has to deliver 1 airplane by 2015.... Obligation met
Reply
Old 09-20-2013 | 11:29 AM
  #2714  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by astec
yeah.. ok. pass the TA and let me know how all that works out for you.. maybe thats what you need is a dose of reality.. I didnt read 'quicker upgrade' in that TA of yours.. have a section reference for me?

a 10% raise in healthcare costs isnt making less money? You're hoping you get 900's. Could be 700's, which are at your current rates.. = pay cut


Good Luck you Blue Streakers!
It's additional airplanes = quicker upgrade. All the conspiracies of replacing 200s is simply not true before the leases are up.

Section header in the TA states larger RJs so doubtful it's 700s.but even if it is, how is it a paycut? We are getting paid the same rates. 1+1=2
Where does it say additional airplanes? Are you nuts? You've never traded a leased car in on a new one? Leases mean nothing. Swap en fir new leases, happens all the time.
Keep talking; your arguments get worse and worse.
Reply
Old 09-20-2013 | 11:54 AM
  #2715  
dudemize's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: ANG
Default

Originally Posted by spaaks
hahahahaha so true
confirm you have agreed to zero wage increases in exchange for bullsh!t administrative changes and a pat on the back. see you in another 10 yrs sucker.

hilarious
Reply
Old 09-20-2013 | 12:00 PM
  #2716  
WmuGrad07's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Whale FO
Default I Love PSA

Selling out future psa pilots for a short lived " quick" upgrade. I hope you can see that your management has nothing if you say no. Where will the planes go next? Who has pilots? Say no and get them anyway.
Reply
Old 09-20-2013 | 12:31 PM
  #2717  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by babs
Do you have any sort of common sense? Mesa and Republic can barely staff the airplanes they currently have. Your selfish and irrational responses to why you should vote yes astound me. It is disappointing to see someone with such a high skill set sell themselves short and bring their peers down in the process.
Did you even read what was said? At all?

Here let me get it for you....
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
Yup, Republic is going to stand up a CRJ operation just to take airplanes that PSA could have gotten if the pilots had just BOHICA'd.

Because RJET's Q400 operation is currently running so smoothly and their previous CRJ experience worked out so well for them.

And Mesa...how do you figger they are going to staff those E-Jets they just got for United, let alone a bunch of additional CRJs for Airways?
Originally Posted by pagey
You are absolutely correct. This is something I considered while voting
You people need to relax. It's a business decision for Airways and needs to be treated as such.

You are taking years off your own life....go have a beer.
Reply
Old 09-20-2013 | 12:39 PM
  #2718  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by Gofish
Rest assured, many if not most will be turned down the minute PSA has an issue with staffing.
A great reason to vote no.....

The clause that mentions being able to hold you at PSA for a year is a doozy.

The better one is the sentence "In its sole discretion" when referring to Airways deciding if there are any qualified applicants at PSA....If their "sole discretion" is that there are no qualified pilots that month their obligation to hire is met..........By hiring NONE
Reply
Old 09-20-2013 | 01:01 PM
  #2719  
What's Avatar
Underpaid...
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
From: French-Canadian
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
Yup, Republic is going to stand up a CRJ operation just to take airplanes that PSA could have gotten if the pilots had just BOHICA'd.

Because RJET's Q400 operation is currently running so smoothly and their previous CRJ experience worked out so well for them.

And Mesa...how do you figger they are going to staff those E-Jets they just got for United, let alone a bunch of additional CRJs for Airways?

Airways can do whatever they want to PSA; they can do it now, and they can do it in the future should this CBA get ratified. That's the downside of being wholly owned; did you people pay no attention to how Comair unwound during and after Delta's bankruptcy?
Pinnacle wasn't wholly owned and look at how Delta drove them into BK, and a few years before that look at Mesa.
Reply
Old 09-20-2013 | 02:05 PM
  #2720  
TMoney's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: 717 Sidekick
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
You people need to relax. It's a business decision for Airways and needs to be treated as such.

You are taking years off your own life....go have a beer.
I agree. The aggressive tone of some of these posts is out of control and completely unprofessional and uncalled for. I hope you realize though that this vote affects every other regional pilot in the country. That is why we are all so focused in following your vote. My pay scale along with those at RAH and Eagle and Mesa, etc, etc. will most likely go down if PSA votes yes. It's a scary thing for all of us! Lets all hold out for raises. It's not out of the question. Roughly $400 million profit in a quarter for the US Airways group is proof that you don't need to take this horrible contract.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Theonemarine
PSA Airlines
67
05-16-2016 04:13 PM
SkyHigh
Leaving the Career
35
10-20-2008 05:44 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
6
10-02-2008 10:46 PM
alarkyokie
Hangar Talk
5
09-25-2008 03:01 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-19-2005 03:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices