Search

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

gojetssss or Psa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2014 | 01:36 PM
  #101  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Moonwolf
1. Eagle took concessions while their parent company was bankrupt. PSA took concession while their parent company had posted record profits.

2. Comair raised the bar, although Awac still has an equal to or better contract than comair, under a 2001 concessionary contract from united express.

While I understand the feeling of most psa pilots, 900's for Mesa, 175s for rah, seeing planes disappear from your grasp as you say no to a crap sandwich. This time you took a bite, in the end, you make your own meal. Let just hope hiring continues at majors and we all can enjoy a career there.

yah right

Crap sandwiches for a career at lowly regionals would to me seem like jail sentence.
aw man if you seriously feel that way you are going to hate life come 2016
Old 08-02-2014 | 03:00 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by JT8D
This response represents a part of why you idiots are completely hopeless. Where did I say they won't eventually offer us a good deal?

I'll help you out there... I never did. Putting words in peoples' mouths is the only way you failures can ever have any semblance of an argument.You said the reason you guys have not received a good offer yet is because PSA would be mad. Did you not?

The company has already willfully violated your recently signed flow through agreement by withholding pilots, so your response is to politely ask them to increase the flow in the future? Good luck on getting any improvements whatsoever. You PSA'ers are like a hooker who puts out before getting paid and then demands the money while being shoved out the door. Only difference is that you don't have some pimp to back you up. The company withholding pilots was absolutely not in violation of our agreement. They are allowed to hold up to the full amount until December of each year. They have been taking the agreed upon amount since june and will take extras after august to catch up.

Instead you have an MEC chairman who had proudly stated that he would be amenable to taking MORE concessions for MORE airplanes. Way to secure your "leverage" there. Pure conjecture and gossip on your part. Please show it to me in writing.

As for upgrade time at Eagle... I am a senior FO who stands to benefit the most from more planes. But guess what? I don't give a sht! This company can go out of business tomorrow for all I care. This job is so easily replaceable in a myriad of other careers it's ridiculous. If everyone thought like me, and if this joke of a company needs us as much as their actions indicate they do, Parker and pals would not have a leg to stand on. I didn't ask for you to soapbox me to death. I asked for upgrade times. Luckily someone else obliged.

You have hidden behind your no vote a lot in the past. Nice to know you fit in with the rest of the pilots over there. I bet ol' Jerry thinks he made an easy kill out of you all. I haven't hidden behind anything. My posts are completely transparent and I tell the good, as well as the bad when asked.
....................
Old 08-02-2014 | 03:17 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
Your misleading the facts a bit, your contract would not even been the same had Eagle MEC not rejected their first offer. So what would you have voted yes to you dont even know what it would have looked like. PSA's best leverage was Eagle MEC turning down AAG.

AAG hasent really honored their bluff until they move the 700's. A draw down would have occurred anyway with Republic's planes coming on.

PSA was offered a 61% increase in their fleet count, I don't think Eagle was ever able to vote on a deal that included a fleet of 350+ frames.

Lastly your not quite out the woodworks yet, AAG can easily wait until your last 900 is on the property and then sell you back 35 ragged out 200 frames with something else, or risk furloughs. Btw the half of the company with the most to loose will be just off year 1 and be a able to vote.
I am most certainly not misleading anything. We already had a contract. The only thing that was changed was an LOA for 12/4, and the insurance sharing increases as well as the LOA for acft and our current hiring agreement.

AAG has said on numerous occasions that they would be taking the 700s away regardless of the outcome of your vote. So the fact that you are still flying your 700s has nothing to do with their "bluff."

So if you were offered a 61% increase at Eagle you would vote yes to 12/4? I'm not really sure what you are getting at with that statement.

As far as taking the 200s away. Sure they could, but why? They have dumped an enormous amount of money into hiring and training about 350 guys so far this year, with more to come. So now they'll just furlough all those guys? Cmon. They got what they wanted as their vision of a long term viable feed option with the 12/4 and the 200 leases are so cheap(straight from VPs mouth AFTER our vote) that they would be viable even with a sharp increase in fuel prices. Where is the motivation for AAG to park our 200s? Just to say "HAHA! we tricked you!". I doubt it. Money talks.
Old 08-02-2014 | 05:11 PM
  #104  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Default

I really just made this post to see everybody get all worked up. Never fails. Thanks for the fun guys!
Old 08-02-2014 | 05:22 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Braniff
sooo eagle voted concessions in bankruptcy while AA had billions in the bank, and you think psa pilots are the idiots? We voted based on history......Comair had raised the bar more than a decade ago, did anybody match their contract to protect them and our industry....NO! Instead you savages ASA/GOJET/PINNACLE/SKYWEST took their planes in stride.......PSA, 2007, offered 40 900's for same pay, we voted NO, offered again a year later, voted NO to protect our industry and the likes of YOU. US Air took our planes converted them to 175's and gave them to REPUBLIC, we furloughed. hey thanks Republic for going for that quick upgrade.

So did we trust our "brothers and sister" at the regionals to stand with us?....HEEELLL NO! We could have been closed up and slinging gear for guys like jt8d

you stood strong eagle, thanks but we aren't going to jump off the bridge with you, your 700's will be going to another and ours would have too.
What you've just said have been regurgitated numerous times on dead ears. Even with that past, 39% of the pilots voted no. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice... You know.

Don't get me wrong. Had the new AA not kept their end of the bargain and brought 4 aircraft on to property already and hired 350 new hires into a regional that has potentially top QOL and potentially top pay, I would've been right there with all you PSA haters and screamed I told you so!
Old 08-02-2014 | 06:53 PM
  #106  
JT8D's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 630
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
....................
I'm not going to parse through all of that so here's the point by point:

1. No, genius I did not. Go back, reread what I said, think about it, and when you fully comprehend that simple statement, come back.

2. Regardless, my analogy and point are still valid, and thusly still stand.

3. Confirmed though multiple sources including your own pilots. Ask around.

4. Soapboxing is part of the nature of this forum. Deal with it.

5. You have pulled the " Don't blame me, I voted no " card numerous times. Don't deny it.
Old 08-02-2014 | 07:14 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by JT8D
I'm not going to parse through all of that so here's the point by point:

1. No, genius I did not. Go back, reread what I said, think about it, and when you fully comprehend that simple statement, come back.

2. Regardless, my analogy and point are still valid, and thusly still stand.

3. Confirmed though multiple sources including your own pilots. Ask around.

4. Soapboxing is part of the nature of this forum. Deal with it.

5. You have pulled the " Don't blame me, I voted no " card numerous times. Don't deny it.
1:

Originally Posted by JT8D
According to someone very much in the know, the company is hesitant to make us a good offer in part because they know once you gullible idiots see it, you will be upset. What does that tell you about your deal that you locked yourselves into?
2: You were wrong but you're still right? Ok.

3: So you don't have that in writing? And you have "sources".....Right. I'm sure they know exactly what the NC talks about behind both closed doors and a NDA.

4: You can't answer a simple question?

5: I have stated that I voted no. I didn't use it to displace blame. I also have stated that I completely understand why people voted yes.

You have become one of the more hostile Eagle posters and clearly cannot have an adult conversation without calling us names.
Old 08-02-2014 | 07:43 PM
  #108  
JT8D's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 630
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
1:



2: You were wrong but you're still right? Ok.

3: So you don't have that in writing? And you have "sources".....Right. I'm sure they know exactly what the NC talks about behind both closed doors and a NDA.

4: You can't answer a simple question?

5: I have stated that I voted no. I didn't use it to displace blame. I also have stated that I completely understand why people voted yes.

You have become one of the more hostile Eagle posters and clearly cannot have an adult conversation without calling us names.
1. Very good, you found my quote! That's the first step. Now use your handy dandy dictionary to discover the meaning of the word "hesitant" and the phrase "in part" as used in my quote. Then use your noggin to determine whether or not that word and that phrase in any way imply an absolution as you previously inferred. Whoops, I used some words here which contain more than four letters. Be sure to look those up too.

2. The fact that your company had not violated your flow through *yet* does not debunk the validity of my analogy of your unions' alleged begging at the back door for improvements.

Originally Posted by JT8D
You PSA'ers are like a hooker who puts out before getting paid and then demands the money while being shoved out the door. Only difference is that you don't have some pimp to back you up.
It's true either way. Your "Sign now, work out the details later" approach is idiotic.

4. You wanted me to answer your question which you could have easily looked up yourself, on this very website? No.

As to calling you names... I call 'em the way I see 'em. You claim to value transparency, so I'm sure you can appreciate my logic here.
Old 08-02-2014 | 07:44 PM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Default

This feels like high school on a playground for kids. Big man on the swing set needs to show who is boss. At the end of the day, this is stupid. Bitter pilots suck, regional or major, our jobs are pretty straight forward. Get home from work and you are done unless its recurrent then open a manual for a bit. Otherwise, enjoy it, it can always be worse.
Old 08-02-2014 | 07:59 PM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Default

In high school (at least my high school), we settled our differences like men when school was out. We didn't pass notes calling each other names...

It is entertaining to read. Some of you guys are hilarious. I still chuckle recalling a poster who called PSA pilots Pomeranians! Followed by another poster putting a pic of a Pomeranian galloping happily down a green pasture lol
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
N927EV
PSA Airlines
77
09-09-2013 08:13 AM
DWN3GRN
PSA Airlines
28
04-15-2010 08:31 PM
Danger Dan
Regional
0
01-27-2009 08:54 PM
Jared
Regional
1
11-03-2007 07:49 AM
DANCRJ
Regional
3
10-10-2007 04:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices