Search

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

gojetssss or Psa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:04 AM
  #81  
cartean's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by JT8D

For someone who allegedly voted against your ta, you sure are a loud proponent...
It's over and done with now, no going back. Whether PSA pilots were for it or against it nothing can be changed now. Only thing to do is accept it and move forward. No reason to create stress, anger and chaos over it at this point.
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:09 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by JT8D
They have given us at Eagle so many "last, best final offers" that I've lost count, yet here they are bugging us for a deal again! One bluff after the next. That's how Jerry Glass works. It is also proof that they do need us and we do have leverage. Your turd TA is a done deal, "enjoy the shiny airplanes and go away until the next amendable round" type of arrangement. You've got nothing.

According to someone very much in the know, the company is hesitant to make us a good offer in part because they know once you gullible idiots see it, you will be upset. What does that tell you about your deal that you locked yourselves into?

For someone who allegedly voted against your ta, you sure are a loud proponent...
Why would AAG care if we are upset? That is your ace in the hole as to why they won't give you a good deal? Say that to yourself over again in your head and maybe you'll realize how ridiculous it sounds. "AAG won't give Eagle a good deal because PSA pilots will be upset about it."........Go ahead say it.....I'll wait.

Good. Now that we have that out of the way.

If our union actually is talking to the company, which is pure unadulterated rumor at this point all they are trying to do is to make our hiring agreement a little better. Either by increasing the number taken every month, or by making it a full blown flow through. The 12/4 is staying. Again, this was all in their original strategy of "play ball now, improvements later."

As far as me being a proponent of the deal: Hindsight being 20/20 I'd probably vote yes at this point after seeing what happened to PSA voting yes, and Eagle after voting no. It's not because I'm "spineless" or a "sellout" it's because it was the smart decision at that time. We also locked in the really really really good parts of our contract for the next 10 years. Parts of the contract that no one at PSA, pilots included, had any idea were as good as they were at that time. We guaranteed that PSA will exist until 2023 in writing via an agreement for acft. That guarantee, coupled with (maybe) trouble hiring gives PSA leverage in negotiations to possibly get a full flow or an increase in required pilots moving from PSA to AAG per month.

I agree that it "isn't fair" that AAG is posting profits and we need to give but unfortunately that is the name of the game at this point for wholly owns which is a unique situation compared to other regionals. Again, this isn't because I'm "spineless" it's because I can see the writing on the wall.

Your union's mantra that "no one can staff" is clearly untrue as Mesa, Compass, and PSA continue to fill every single class they run.

On a seperate note, what are the upgrade times right now at Eagle? I'd like to throw some rough numbers at you after your response.
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:12 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
From: GV Captain
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
On a seperate note, what are the upgrade times right now at Eagle? I'd like to throw some rough numbers at you after your response.
Ill answer that for you. 7-8yrs and increasing due to NO NEW Hires through the door and parking airplanes.
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:48 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
Why would AAG care if we are upset? That is your ace in the hole as to why they won't give you a good deal? Say that to yourself over again in your head and maybe you'll realize how ridiculous it sounds. "AAG won't give Eagle a good deal because PSA pilots will be upset about it."........Go ahead say it.....I'll wait.

Good. Now that we have that out of the way.

If our union actually is talking to the company, which is pure unadulterated rumor at this point all they are trying to do is to make our hiring agreement a little better. Either by increasing the number taken every month, or by making it a full blown flow through. The 12/4 is staying. Again, this was all in their original strategy of "play ball now, improvements later."

As far as me being a proponent of the deal: Hindsight being 20/20 I'd probably vote yes at this point after seeing what happened to PSA voting yes, and Eagle after voting no. It's not because I'm "spineless" or a "sellout" it's because it was the smart decision at that time. We also locked in the really really really good parts of our contract for the next 10 years. Parts of the contract that no one at PSA, pilots included, had any idea were as good as they were at that time. We guaranteed that PSA will exist until 2023 in writing via an agreement for acft. That guarantee, coupled with (maybe) trouble hiring gives PSA leverage in negotiations to possibly get a full flow or an increase in required pilots moving from PSA to AAG per month.

I agree that it "isn't fair" that AAG is posting profits and we need to give but unfortunately that is the name of the game at this point for wholly owns which is a unique situation compared to other regionals. Again, this isn't because I'm "spineless" it's because I can see the writing on the wall.

Your union's mantra that "no one can staff" is clearly untrue as Mesa, Compass, and PSA continue to fill every single class they run.

On a seperate note, what are the upgrade times right now at Eagle? I'd like to throw some rough numbers at you after your response.
Your misleading the facts a bit, your contract would not even been the same had Eagle MEC not rejected their first offer. So what would you have voted yes to you dont even know what it would have looked like. PSA's best leverage was Eagle MEC turning down AAG.

AAG hasent really honored their bluff until they move the 700's. A draw down would have occurred anyway with Republic's planes coming on.

PSA was offered a 61% increase in their fleet count, I don't think Eagle was ever able to vote on a deal that included a fleet of 350+ frames.

Lastly your not quite out the woodworks yet, AAG can easily wait until your last 900 is on the property and then sell you back 35 ragged out 200 frames with something else, or risk furloughs. Btw the half of the company with the most to loose will be just off year 1 and be a able to vote.
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:52 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
On a seperate note, what are the upgrade times right now at Eagle? I'd like to throw some rough numbers at you after your response.
How many months did it take to go from 8 years to where its at? Any company can always be 1 undercutting contract away form growth. It has taken a year, maybe 1.5?
Old 08-02-2014 | 09:55 AM
  #86  
CaptKrunch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: LeftSeat PA-44
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
Your misleading the facts a bit, your contract would not even been the same had Eagle MEC not rejected their first offer. So what would you have voted yes to you dont even know what it would have looked like. PSA's best leverage was Eagle MEC turning down AAG.

AAG hasent really honored their bluff until they move the 700's. A draw down would have occurred anyway with Republic's planes coming on.

PSA was offered a 61% increase in their fleet count, I don't think Eagle was ever able to vote on a deal that included a fleet of 350+ frames.

Lastly your not quite out the woodworks yet, AAG can easily wait until your last 900 is on the property and then sell you back 35 ragged out 200 frames with something else, or risk furloughs. Btw the half of the company with the most to loose will be just off year 1 and be a able to vote.
If AAG does sell the 200's somehow. (they JUST renewed the leases). Then our pay goes from 200-700/900 blended rate to a strait 700/900 rate and my pay will go up another couple dollars.
Old 08-02-2014 | 10:13 AM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKrunch
If AAG does sell the 200's somehow. (they JUST renewed the leases). Then our pay goes from 200-700/900 blended rate to a strait 700/900 rate and my pay will go up another couple dollars.
Right, but I meant sell them to you Union for concessions, or move them and lose 400 jobs. Btw the 400 jobs would be guys on year 1.1 and gullible and vote for any type of concession to keep their job.
Old 08-02-2014 | 10:24 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
Your misleading the facts a bit, your contract would not even been the same had Eagle MEC not rejected their first offer. So what would you have voted yes to you dont even know what it would have looked like. PSA's best leverage was Eagle MEC turning down AAG.

AAG hasent really honored their bluff until they move the 700's. A draw down would have occurred anyway with Republic's planes coming on.

PSA was offered a 61% increase in their fleet count, I don't think Eagle was ever able to vote on a deal that included a fleet of 350+ frames.

Lastly your not quite out the woodworks yet, AAG can easily wait until your last 900 is on the property and then sell you back 35 ragged out 200 frames with something else, or risk furloughs. Btw the half of the company with the most to loose will be just off year 1 and be a able to vote.
There seems to be misunderstanding about this. Our contract was the same as it is now before eagle vote or even the AA merger. The TA you're talking about only included pay caps, and the preferential hiring thing. The SAP, min day and all the other soft pay sections were never touched.
Old 08-02-2014 | 10:34 AM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fullflank
There seems to be misunderstanding about this. Our contract was the same as it is now before eagle vote or even the AA merger. The TA you're talking about only included pay caps, and the preferential hiring thing. The SAP, min day and all the other soft pay sections were never touched.
So, if Eagle would have taken the concessionary offered right after Endeavor had, than PSA would have......?
Old 08-02-2014 | 10:36 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
So, if Eagle would have taken the concessionary offered right after Endeavor had, than PSA would have......?
Same exact contract but no pay caps.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
N927EV
PSA Airlines
77
09-09-2013 08:13 AM
DWN3GRN
PSA Airlines
28
04-15-2010 08:31 PM
Danger Dan
Regional
0
01-27-2009 08:54 PM
Jared
Regional
1
11-03-2007 07:49 AM
DANCRJ
Regional
3
10-10-2007 04:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices