The Useful PSA Thread
#4441
I need to make an apology on this thread. I guess being young and naive made me think two Alpa shops could work out a deal to mutually benefit each other.
When I was shopping regionals Mesa and RAH were the only two companies announcing new flying. If the PSA TA wouldn't have passed Mesa would have gotten the order. Compasss got an order after envoy's vote didn't pass. It's clear a day that Mesa would have gotten the 900s. I calculated that I could drop down to 65 hours and make the same as a Mesa pilot working 75hours with 11 whole days off. It's clear that the 900s are on a more valuable contract than they would have been even with the concessionary TA. The 700s are a victim of a merger period. No different than losing in SLI through arbitration. The PSA Mec made a poor choice writing this letter.
I by no means think the Eagle Mec has done anything applaudable for their pilots. Telling your pilots to quit is 10 times more disgracefull than this letter could be.
Endeavor paid bonuses and had a nyc base. So what, any eagle pilot can figure out how to quit and become a new hire all by themselves, they don't need to pay dues for that privilege. Endeavor was hiring guys back at their pervious longgevity, did Eagle shop talk about that. Did they talk about allowing them to keep their seniority on the eagle list if they quit for endeavor. Did the Eagle Union have any conversation about anything that an eagle pilot couldn't acheive on his own. Isn't that the point of a union? To not even have a conversation, and look your pilots in the face and say we tried everthying is a discrase. It shows your senior group is more worried about scales than jobs, but will be happy to collect dues from them right up until the day they're furloughed.
When I was shopping regionals Mesa and RAH were the only two companies announcing new flying. If the PSA TA wouldn't have passed Mesa would have gotten the order. Compasss got an order after envoy's vote didn't pass. It's clear a day that Mesa would have gotten the 900s. I calculated that I could drop down to 65 hours and make the same as a Mesa pilot working 75hours with 11 whole days off. It's clear that the 900s are on a more valuable contract than they would have been even with the concessionary TA. The 700s are a victim of a merger period. No different than losing in SLI through arbitration. The PSA Mec made a poor choice writing this letter.
I by no means think the Eagle Mec has done anything applaudable for their pilots. Telling your pilots to quit is 10 times more disgracefull than this letter could be.
Endeavor paid bonuses and had a nyc base. So what, any eagle pilot can figure out how to quit and become a new hire all by themselves, they don't need to pay dues for that privilege. Endeavor was hiring guys back at their pervious longgevity, did Eagle shop talk about that. Did they talk about allowing them to keep their seniority on the eagle list if they quit for endeavor. Did the Eagle Union have any conversation about anything that an eagle pilot couldn't acheive on his own. Isn't that the point of a union? To not even have a conversation, and look your pilots in the face and say we tried everthying is a discrase. It shows your senior group is more worried about scales than jobs, but will be happy to collect dues from them right up until the day they're furloughed.
Have you bothered to ask the PCL MEC if there was any discussion of longevity transfer for ENY pilots?
In fact, the coversations were with Delta, the response came by way of Endeavor management asking their MEC what longevity transfer they'd give Envoy pilots. Who do you think pushed National to get United to run the open house, or the Alaska one. We started that back at the BOD meeting. The Envoy MEC has been hard at work helping pilots move UP, not sideways. We leave sideways gaming to the likes of the PSA MEC. Solving regional staffing is the job of management; they can fix it with their checkbook as demonstrated by Endeavor.
You make a lot of assumptions and false accusations for having such an obvious lack of factual information.
#4442
Banned
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Have you bothered to ask the PCL MEC if there was any discussion of longevity transfer for ENY pilots?
In fact, the coversations were with Delta, the response came by way of Endeavor management asking their MEC what longevity transfer they'd give Envoy pilots. Who do you think pushed National to get United to run the open house, or the Alaska one. We started that back at the BOD meeting. The Envoy MEC has been hard at work helping pilots move UP, not sideways. We leave sideways gaming to the likes of the PSA MEC. Solving regional staffing is the job of management; they can fix it with their checkbook as demonstrated by Endeavor.
You make a lot of assumptions and false accusations for having such an obvious lack of factual information.
In fact, the coversations were with Delta, the response came by way of Endeavor management asking their MEC what longevity transfer they'd give Envoy pilots. Who do you think pushed National to get United to run the open house, or the Alaska one. We started that back at the BOD meeting. The Envoy MEC has been hard at work helping pilots move UP, not sideways. We leave sideways gaming to the likes of the PSA MEC. Solving regional staffing is the job of management; they can fix it with their checkbook as demonstrated by Endeavor.
You make a lot of assumptions and false accusations for having such an obvious lack of factual information.
#4443
Banned
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Actually the PSA pilots delivered that setback. Only temporary though.
#4444
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 675
Likes: 20
Have you bothered to ask the PCL MEC if there was any discussion of longevity transfer for ENY pilots?
In fact, the coversations were with Delta, the response came by way of Endeavor management asking their MEC what longevity transfer they'd give Envoy pilots. Who do you think pushed National to get United to run the open house, or the Alaska one. We started that back at the BOD meeting. The Envoy MEC has been hard at work helping pilots move UP, not sideways. We leave sideways gaming to the likes of the PSA MEC. Solving regional staffing is the job of management; they can fix it with their checkbook as demonstrated by Endeavor.
You make a lot of assumptions and false accusations for having such an obvious lack of factual information.
In fact, the coversations were with Delta, the response came by way of Endeavor management asking their MEC what longevity transfer they'd give Envoy pilots. Who do you think pushed National to get United to run the open house, or the Alaska one. We started that back at the BOD meeting. The Envoy MEC has been hard at work helping pilots move UP, not sideways. We leave sideways gaming to the likes of the PSA MEC. Solving regional staffing is the job of management; they can fix it with their checkbook as demonstrated by Endeavor.
You make a lot of assumptions and false accusations for having such an obvious lack of factual information.
#4446
Banned
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Unless the Envoy pilots come with seniority and their contract, they would only lose and not agree to it.
#4447
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 675
Likes: 20
This would be about as close to a "National Seniority List," that so many guys dream about, you can get.
Also to think this isn't going to be essentially whats going on, minus the longevity, is crazy. I know lots of 1-3 year FOs at envoy who are on the fence about going over to PSA. Street captains might be the last little push they need.
Again, this won't gain any traction, but maybe be a little slow to get ****ed about all this stuff. It could have potentially been a good thing for the industry.
#4448
Banned
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Every 2-8 year Envoy CRJ FO would be a captain at PSA. Let the unions figure out the particulars of how benefits and such would work. "Flow" 10 pilots over per plane into an upgrade class each month. Envoy keeps its staffing high, PSA gets the glut of captains it needs. Then in a few years when AA decides to re-shuffle the deck again... move pilots right back over to PDT or wherever, with their seniority. Slowly ends the whipsaw game.
This would be about as close to a "National Seniority List," that so many guys dream about, you can get.
This would be about as close to a "National Seniority List," that so many guys dream about, you can get.
Unless the Envoy pilots come over with bidding seniority and their contract with flow for them in tact, it would not be good for the industry.
#4449
#4450
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 150
They said they couldn't agree, but that doesn't mean the company can't hire them anyways. If read the whole email it also says that the company would have to pay any displaced fos captains pay once they upgrade retroactively. Nonetheless, just like anything in the contract the company can do whatever they want all the union can do is grieve it and take it to arbitration.
To add to this, we should consider recalling our mec and other reps if they do not stop trying to get **** accomplished that we aren't in favor of. For instance, why the hell has the ssp not been fully addressed? IF the company is really interested in staffing then they need to realize people need an incentive to go here, or anywhere else, growth isn't enough in this day and age.
Who the hell decided it was smart to elect an MEC Chair that was planning on leaving next week? Holy crap, how short sighted was that? We should be looking for a chair that plans on staying for at least a year or two longer.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



