PSA info

Reply Subscribe

Page 203 of 689

203

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

04-06-2016 | 06:59 PM

#2021

eaglefly

Banned

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 8,350

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eaglepilot84

We're expecting to flow about 10/month while the recalls come back. This is actually good news considering they don't have to send any. As of 2APR we have flowed 89 in 2016.

I have seen no announcement of this. Could you please cite your source ? "Good news" really should be based on more then just expectations.

04-06-2016 | 07:07 PM

#2022

Jersdawg

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jan 2014

Posts: 674

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by eaglefly

I have seen no announcement of this. Could you please cite your source ? "Good news" really should be based on more then just expectations.

Calls went out for May for ten, so while it's not a direct source, secondhand info supports the aforementioned ten next month.

04-06-2016 | 07:15 PM

#2023

eaglefly

Banned

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 8,350

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jersdawg

Calls went out for May for ten, so while it's not a direct source, secondhand info supports the aforementioned ten next month.

The first Letter T pilots aren't slated to return until the May 17 class, so any flows in the May 3 class aren't a good representation of whether AA plans to run flows concurrent with Letter T recalls. Absent any confirmation of that plan from management, I think it's premature to assume they will.

04-06-2016 | 07:17 PM

#2024

Eaglepilot84

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Dec 2015

Posts: 416

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by eaglefly

I have seen no announcement of this. Could you please cite your source ? "Good news" really should be based on more then just expectations.

No I won't cite my source because it came verbally via someone in management. Not every piece of info is published, you should know this smarty pants.

04-06-2016 | 07:19 PM

#2025

eaglefly

Banned

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 8,350

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eaglepilot84

No I won't cite my source because it came verbally via someone in management. Not every piece of info is published, you should know this smarty pants.

LOL !

I consider this unsubstantiated claim to be worthless, smarty dress and AFAIC, so should everyone else. No official confirmation, it's simply rumor, nothing more.

04-06-2016 | 07:26 PM

#2026

Eaglepilot84

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Dec 2015

Posts: 416

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by eaglefly

LOL !

I consider this unsubstantiated claim to be worthless, smarty dress and AFAIC, so should everyone else. No official confirmation, it's simply rumor, nothing more.

It's a good thing I really don't care whether anyone (especially you) chooses to think of my claim as worthless or not. I'm just passing on information that was relayed to me. Do with it what you wish.

04-06-2016 | 07:29 PM

#2027

eaglefly

Banned

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 8,350

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eaglepilot84

I did. You'd think if there was to be flows mixed in with recalls management would state that, after all, there is no reason not to state that and it would be more good news for Envoy pilots.

Your rumor is noted.

04-06-2016 | 07:31 PM

#2028

Jersdawg

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jan 2014

Posts: 674

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by eaglefly

Fair enough. I seem to remember hearing it from a legit source that there would be a limited number of flows as letter T's were called back into the fold, but I can't quote it or substantiate right now, so we will wait and see. Hard to do for us airline types, I know!

04-06-2016 | 07:35 PM

#2029

eaglefly

Banned

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 8,350

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jersdawg

Hey, I think it would be great news, I just haven't seen any announcement and I cannot understand why such a thing would be some type of secret. I hope they do and IF they do, they'll have to do it for all the WO's. I think even if the 5/17 class is all T's, we'd still have to wait for June for the story on this.