PSA info
04-08-2016 | 06:17 PM
#2141
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: none
Read it again.
Not after block in unless you are given 10 hours rest.
Modified before...yes they can.
They are not doing it before. They do it when you call to check out...well after block in.
Another reactionary policy...only this one is not just crappy it is illegal.
Not after block in unless you are given 10 hours rest.
Modified before...yes they can.
They are not doing it before. They do it when you call to check out...well after block in.
Another reactionary policy...only this one is not just crappy it is illegal.
04-08-2016 | 07:26 PM
#2142
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Keep in mind the Q&A is ALPA's interpretation of the actual reg. Support your claim with that instead.
04-08-2016 | 08:21 PM
#2143
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 146
Growth and new hires means less reserve, quicker upgrades, better schedules and the ability to flow more to American creating and overall better QOL for every one. I guess you consider going from zero 121 time to a line holding captain in 3 years taking it in the rear. I tend to think of it as better overall QOL, pay and career progression but hey what do I know. Ask our 3 years CA if they will trade their place with an Endeavor pilot.
04-08-2016 | 08:26 PM
#2144
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 146
Not that it matters.
PS (Both of you are right) Something needs to change, but AAs complete disregard for bargaining in good faith and our pilot group not having any leverage as long as someone (any other regional) exists that can do the flying cheaper than us or the same cost theres really nothing that can change.
Of course unless AA grows a heart ( like the Grinch).
04-09-2016 | 07:24 AM
#2145
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
https://far117understanding.files.wo...17_feb2015.pdf
Also, read 12.C.4 of the contract.
04-09-2016 | 09:44 AM
#2147
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: none
To answer this again, realize that the file you linked to is the 1st edition of ALPA's Guide to 117. Check out question 97 in the third edition:
https://far117understanding.files.wo...17_feb2015.pdf
Also, read 12.C.4 of the contract.
https://far117understanding.files.wo...17_feb2015.pdf
Also, read 12.C.4 of the contract.
Read question 98.
Basic contract law-Void if illegal.
Same fact pattern, still illegal
04-09-2016 | 09:44 AM
#2148
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: CL-65
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/pol_adjudication/agc200/part117/Part117_Interps/Part117ByReg/
Far 117 has been watered down quite a bit with interpretations. Take a look for yourself. ALPA is on revision 3 of their guide. More revisions to come most likely.
Far 117 has been watered down quite a bit with interpretations. Take a look for yourself. ALPA is on revision 3 of their guide. More revisions to come most likely.
04-09-2016 | 09:57 AM
#2149
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
But at the same time remember that that document is an ALPA interpretation of 117 and it's later FAA interpretations. If you want to keep playing this game that support your position with actual regulation and FAA interpretations instead. The Anderson letter is real interesting reading.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
63
04-08-2016 05:05 PM
