Search

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

PSA info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2015 | 10:59 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Slick111
Ok. Here are the facts:

1(a) Parker offers PSA pilots new CRJ 900 jets in exchange for concessions. PSA Pilots say no, and those jets went to Mesa.
1(b) Parker offers Envoy pilots new E-170 jets in exchange for concessions. Envoy pilots say no, and those jets went to Compass.

2(a) Parker offers PSA pilots new jets in exchange for concessions. PSA pilots say no and Parker sent those jets to Republic.
2(b) Parker offers Envoy pilots new E-170's in exchange for concessions. Envoy pilots say no and Parker sent those jets to Republic.

3(a) Parker again offers new CRJ 900's to PSA pilots in exchange for concessions, with the caveat that the airline would be shut down if they said no again. PSA pilots took the deal.
3(b) Parker again offers new E-170's to Envoy pilots in exchange for concessions, with the caveat that the airline would be shut down if they said no again. Envoy pilots took the deal.

So as we can clearly see, it's ok for Envoy pilots to take a deal in order to save their jobs,....... but it's not ok for PSA pilots to take that same deal in order to save THEIR jobs.
I understand this. You understand this. But some people are too blinded to see it for how it really is.
Reply
Old 12-02-2015 | 11:03 AM
  #42  
Slick111's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by daOldMan
I understand this. You understand this. But some people are too blinded to see it for how it really is.
And that's why I seem to have to repeatedly remind them. These irrational PSA haters are entitled to their own opinions but they're not entitled to their own facts.
Reply
Old 12-02-2015 | 11:03 AM
  #43  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

What a waste of a thread...
Reply
Old 12-02-2015 | 11:15 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Default PSA info

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
What a waste of a thread...

Off to The Useful PSA Thread!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 12-02-2015 | 11:19 AM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 368
Likes: 37
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyDingus
Off to The Useful PSA Thread!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Surprise, surprise...they should probably just do everyone a favor and shut down the whole regional area of APC.
Reply
Old 12-02-2015 | 11:20 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DETSports
Surprise, surprise...they should probably just do everyone a favor and shut down the whole regional area of APC.

Where will I get my daily dose of laughing at idiots on here?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 12-02-2015 | 12:05 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Slick111
Ok. Here are the facts:

1(a) Parker offers PSA pilots new CRJ 900 jets in exchange for concessions. PSA Pilots say no, and those jets went to Mesa.
1(b) Parker offers Envoy pilots new E-170 jets in exchange for concessions. Envoy pilots say no, and those jets went to Compass.

2(a) Parker offers PSA pilots new jets in exchange for concessions. PSA pilots say no and Parker sent those jets to Republic.
2(b) Parker offers Envoy pilots new E-170's in exchange for concessions. Envoy pilots say no and Parker sent those jets to Republic.

3(a) Parker again offers new CRJ 900's to PSA pilots in exchange for concessions, with the caveat that the airline would be shut down if they said no again. PSA pilots took the deal.
3(b) Parker again offers new E-170's to Envoy pilots in exchange for concessions, with the caveat that the airline would be shut down if they said no again. Envoy pilots took the deal.

So as we can clearly see, it's ok for Envoy pilots to take a deal in order to save their jobs,....... but it's not ok for PSA pilots to take that same deal in order to save THEIR jobs.
Comical. Show me exactly where the PSA pilots said no. Show me when the group voted. When they voted, they passed it, just like they would've passed any of the previous ones if presented.
Reply
Old 12-02-2015 | 12:15 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Slick111
Ok. Here are the facts:

1(a) Parker offers PSA pilots new CRJ 900 jets in exchange for concessions. PSA Pilots say no, and those jets went to Mesa.
1(b) Parker offers Envoy pilots new E-170 jets in exchange for concessions. Envoy pilots say no, and those jets went to Compass.

2(a) Parker offers PSA pilots new jets in exchange for concessions. PSA pilots say no and Parker sent those jets to Republic.
2(b) Parker offers Envoy pilots new E-170's in exchange for concessions. Envoy pilots say no and Parker sent those jets to Republic.

3(a) Parker again offers new CRJ 900's to PSA pilots in exchange for concessions, with the caveat that the airline would be shut down if they said no again. PSA pilots took the deal.
3(b) Parker again offers new E-170's to Envoy pilots in exchange for concessions, with the caveat that the airline would be shut down if they said no again. Envoy pilots took the deal.

So as we can clearly see, it's ok for Envoy pilots to take a deal in order to save their jobs,....... but it's not ok for PSA pilots to take that same deal in order to save THEIR jobs.
Your time line needs some work. How about cite some dates. It's not in order that's for sure.

Don't forget parker offered 200's to PDT they wouldn't bend over.
He went to PSA and they did.
Reply
Old 12-02-2015 | 12:31 PM
  #49  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 114
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by AboveAndBeyond
Additional flying - PSA has been doing quite a bit of new flying in the past few months. Several new destinations have been added, and new Canadian flying is starting in January.
What Canadian routes?
Reply
Old 12-02-2015 | 12:38 PM
  #50  
Slick111's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RawHide
Your time line needs some work. How about cite some dates. It's not in order that's for sure.

Don't forget parker offered 200's to PDT they wouldn't bend over.
He went to PSA and they did.
Originally Posted by TillerEnvy
Comical. Show me exactly where the PSA pilots said no. Show me when the group voted. When they voted, they passed it, just like they would've passed any of the previous ones if presented.
I've given you the facts. I've given you the history. If I gave you dates, voting results, and hair color of the pilots who voted for and against these deals and you guys still wouldn't be satisfied. The fact that you aren't aware of these facts tells me that you either haven't been a regional airline pilot for very long or you simply weren't paying attention.

PSA voted "no" twice when offered new jets in exchange for concessions and those jets went to other regional airlines. Envoy also voted "no" twice when offered new jets in exchange for concessions and those jets went to other regional airlines. But when given the ultimatum that their airlines would be shut down if they voted "no" a third time, BOTH PSA and Envoy took the deal(s). The only difference was that Envoy accepted a $12,500 bribe in exchange for their votes.

But your statements suggest that my history lesson is inaccurate. So please, by all means,....... tell us all (specifically!!!) where my history lesson is wrong. Or just S.T.F.U. and we'll all know that you aren't as smart as you would have us believe and that you're just talking out of your a$$.

Last edited by Slick111; 12-02-2015 at 12:52 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Joliet
PSA Airlines
47
02-23-2017 07:35 PM
JetJock16
Regional
63
04-08-2016 05:05 PM
Jetstream 823JS
PSA Airlines
157
03-21-2016 02:53 PM
FirstClass
PSA Airlines
32
03-19-2016 04:42 PM
AnotherEagleGuy
PSA Airlines
52
12-02-2015 04:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices