PSA info
#6271
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Being a LCA and a mentor, let me give you a little advice. If you are just starting training here at PSA, your time will be better spent preparing for indoc, systems and IPT. When you start IOE, I will take an afternoon to spend time in FLICA and in the company website. Discussions about SAP and payroll processes are silly when you need to be concerning yourself with limitations and memory items. Placing the cart before the horse will only delay you getting to the point where you actually use FLICA. If you are on property and would like to discuss this issues, contact me directly through more appropriate measures.
Respectfully, Michael 39%
Respectfully, Michael 39%
If you remember back to CFI you might remember the term chunking. So in that regards I agree with don't put the cart before the horse. Step 1, then step 2, etc, etc.
Simply taking a break from that and asking questions about your future did not equate to putting the cart before the horse.
I know you and every other instructor probably mean well. Dial it back a notch please.
#6273
Banned
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Knowing the psa management, they will develop a memory item for wildlife strikes. I betcha it's coming.
#6274
#6275
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Having recently been through the pipeline I beg to differ, to a degree. Yes, your point is valid. You do not have to live a warrior monk life style to succeed here. If anything, based on my experience, the constant harping of limitations and memory items creates unnecessary stress. I saw a lot of my class mates struggling just because they are trying to memorize 4b verbatim after the instructors day in and day out beat the " you got to know know this" drum.
If you remember back to CFI you might remember the term chunking. So in that regards I agree with don't put the cart before the horse. Step 1, then step 2, etc, etc.
Simply taking a break from that and asking questions about your future did not equate to putting the cart before the horse.
I know you and every other instructor probably mean well. Dial it back a notch please.
If you remember back to CFI you might remember the term chunking. So in that regards I agree with don't put the cart before the horse. Step 1, then step 2, etc, etc.
Simply taking a break from that and asking questions about your future did not equate to putting the cart before the horse.
I know you and every other instructor probably mean well. Dial it back a notch please.
#6276
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
That crew did a good job and handled it professionally. After reading about what happened and their reaction, I was even more proud to be a pilot at this company. Exactly what I would expect from almost any regional crew. If PDT, or Envoy, or AWAC, or SkyWest had a similar thing happen, I would expect them to handle it professionally as well, and I am sure that they would handle it the same way.
#6277
Banned
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
That crew did a good job and handled it professionally. After reading about what happened and their reaction, I was even more proud to be a pilot at this company. Exactly what I would expect from almost any regional crew. If PDT, or Envoy, or AWAC, or SkyWest had a similar thing happen, I would expect them to handle it professionally as well, and I am sure that they would handle it the same way.
Get a life lol
#6278
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
I would rather be at a legacy carrier, and will be there some day. But, if I had to choose a regional to be a stepping stone, I am glad that I picked PSA.
In reading your last 15 posts in various threads, you have trolled just about every other regional. This in the internet and you can do that. But, I think that the pilots at PSA have a stable, growing company with a bright future. We have a pretty good pilot group, good maintenance, a good route structure, and the best QOL that any regional can offer. So, if you ask me if I am proud to be at PSA, the answer is yes. Similarly, if you ask me if I will accept the first legacy offer that I get, the answer will also be yes.
#6280
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Regarding the deer incident, it was after V1 I am assuming?
There was obviously damage to the wing as it was leaking fuel on the landing.
My question is this (and I currently fly a 172)....
Obviously after V1 if you abort you're going to end up in the dirt or the trees. However, if something damages your wing on the roll, would getting airborne also be hazardous due to the potential of catastrophic damage to the airframe from the strike?
In other words, is it better to knowingly put it into the dirt or trees instead of risk getting airborne and having no control?
In this situation they did the right thing because the damage was not catastrophic and they were able to make a go-around. But what if the wing had been damaged to the point of not being flyable?
I am curious and would like to learn more.
There was obviously damage to the wing as it was leaking fuel on the landing.
My question is this (and I currently fly a 172)....
Obviously after V1 if you abort you're going to end up in the dirt or the trees. However, if something damages your wing on the roll, would getting airborne also be hazardous due to the potential of catastrophic damage to the airframe from the strike?
In other words, is it better to knowingly put it into the dirt or trees instead of risk getting airborne and having no control?
In this situation they did the right thing because the damage was not catastrophic and they were able to make a go-around. But what if the wing had been damaged to the point of not being flyable?
I am curious and would like to learn more.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
63
04-08-2016 05:05 PM




