Comair updates?
#9072
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
I find this hard to believe. Why the eff would Comair turn down any chance at more flying? Sure, Comair would prefer more 70 seat flying, but if the only offer on the table is for 50s, I would REALLY like to think that they will snatch it up before it's too late. If the decline in oilprices continues, 50 seat flying can be profitable again.
Oh, and gas is down to $2.37 a gallon in DSM. Never thought I'd see that again.
Oh, and gas is down to $2.37 a gallon in DSM. Never thought I'd see that again.
If 50 seat flying makes money and we should pick it up anywhere we can get it, then why are there so many of our aircraft parked and pilots furloughed? Wouldn't Delta be puting those airframes in the air?
#9073
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
So what. If you wanted to work for peanuts you could have applied at Mesa. Mesa was coming either way, they were hired assassins to undermine our contract for BK.
#9074
[quote=TurboDog;482138]Rumor is that the only flying United has available is 50 seat lift and OH isn't interested in that. United is limited to the number of 70 seat aircraft providing lift, so it doensn't appear that we will get anything from them.
I believe it is true that Comair turned down flying for UA because the length of the contract was not very long (less than 12 months, maybe?). (Doesn't make sense to put the time/money/effort into starting up ops with another carrier, only to cease to fly for them as soon as everything is up and running.) Upon turning down that contract, I believe we were invited by UA to bid on a more long-term RFP and that is where we stand right now--waiting for it to be awarded to someone.
I believe it is true that Comair turned down flying for UA because the length of the contract was not very long (less than 12 months, maybe?). (Doesn't make sense to put the time/money/effort into starting up ops with another carrier, only to cease to fly for them as soon as everything is up and running.) Upon turning down that contract, I believe we were invited by UA to bid on a more long-term RFP and that is where we stand right now--waiting for it to be awarded to someone.
#9076
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
[quote=ComairFO;482296]
I agree that we probably have a bid in, however unless someone drops out there will be no room for more 70+ flying. As of right now it's under scope, so unless something changes Comair still stands on it's knees begging for more money to buy another crack rock to get them by for another day.
Rumor is that the only flying United has available is 50 seat lift and OH isn't interested in that. United is limited to the number of 70 seat aircraft providing lift, so it doensn't appear that we will get anything from them.
I believe it is true that Comair turned down flying for UA because the length of the contract was not very long (less than 12 months, maybe?). (Doesn't make sense to put the time/money/effort into starting up ops with another carrier, only to cease to fly for them as soon as everything is up and running.) Upon turning down that contract, I believe we were invited by UA to bid on a more long-term RFP and that is where we stand right now--waiting for it to be awarded to someone.
I believe it is true that Comair turned down flying for UA because the length of the contract was not very long (less than 12 months, maybe?). (Doesn't make sense to put the time/money/effort into starting up ops with another carrier, only to cease to fly for them as soon as everything is up and running.) Upon turning down that contract, I believe we were invited by UA to bid on a more long-term RFP and that is where we stand right now--waiting for it to be awarded to someone.
#9077
I would still like someone either in management or at ALPA to comment on the exponential growth at NW's wholly-owned regionals as of late. After the DL/NW merger Compass and Mesaba will be DCI carriers. Our 2007 TA had stipulations in it for Comair to receive a percentage of "unawarded aircraft" that started at 40% in 2007 and decreased in 10% increments each year. Yet one more reason I voted "no" on that piece of ****e. And now we sit and watch soon-to-be-but-not-quite-yet DCI carriers getting new airframes as we furlough and park airframes. Once again we're made to look like fools by lawyers and manager that at the end of the day are smarter than we are.
So while we bicker about ASAP and launch ad hominems at the same targets each day I'm reminded of a playground fight: "I know you are but what am I....my dad is bigger than your dad....am too...are not..."
Now, excuse me while I go pay my $20.00 merger assessment fee......
So while we bicker about ASAP and launch ad hominems at the same targets each day I'm reminded of a playground fight: "I know you are but what am I....my dad is bigger than your dad....am too...are not..."
Now, excuse me while I go pay my $20.00 merger assessment fee......
#9078
I'm sure someone can dredge up the transcript of the Delta earnings call, but Delta's CEO made it very clear that Delta wants nothing to do with us once the court issues are resolved.
#9079
The only thing I saw in the conference call was that Delta intends to "rigorously fight the Mesa lawsuit."
FWIW, they also talked about how beneficial it will be to have 3 wholly-owned carriers after the merger, should the need arise to reduce domestic capacity even more.
ComairFO
FWIW, they also talked about how beneficial it will be to have 3 wholly-owned carriers after the merger, should the need arise to reduce domestic capacity even more.
ComairFO
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



